Candace Owens, one of the biggest political influencers, is living a lie. Candace is one of the most discussed women of our time, yet no one has told the full story. She is deliberately misleading her conservative Christian anti-Zionist audience in profound ways that undermine her entire credibility.
Candace’s entire brand is that she is “looking for the truth.” However, she has been extremely dishonest about herself. Candace is always “just asking questions,” but what I’ve found raises a myriad of questions.
Your opinion on any particular politics is moot. What matters is that Candace Owens’ opinions don’t match her real-world actions. Candace Owens has cultivated an image that’s a ruse.
This is a tale of hypocrisy, subterfuge, and monumental deception. Candace’s brand is “authenticity,” and it’s all been a fabrication.
Today I bring the revelation of who the self-described “Catholic trad wife” Candace Amber Owens truly is: a fraudulent lesbian in a false marriage with a Hebrew-speaking Zionist husband who’s allegedly gay.
Candace met her husband, George Farmer, whom she cheated on in 2022, at an event hosted by a Scientologist in Jeffrey Epstein’s black book and named in the Epstein files. In Russia, Candace attended events run by Jeffrey Epstein’s Russian spook fixer.
Candace takes money from the 7th-richest man in the world, Larry Ellison. At the same time, her husband, who has her customers’ info, calls for criticism of Israel to be illegal and brags about working on behalf of Israel.
One of the key pillars of Candace Owens's work is her most popular series, “Becoming Brigitte,” accusing Brigitte Macron, the First Lady of France, of being a man with a hidden past. Ironically, Candace herself is lying about her own past, sexuality, and her connections as she accuses Brigitte Macron and Emmanuel Macron.
Although this deals with scandal, look deeper. A larger tapestry of deceit, strange connections, and extreme hypocrisy emerges. It's easy to focus on the salacious aspects and go “she’s a lesbian who cheated on her Zionist husband”; however, I truly implore you to ponder the implications of these revelations.
Candace Owens constantly claims she has nothing to hide. She says her life is spent between “church” and my “children.” She says there’s nothing to “find” on her; “they literally have nothing on me.” Maybe “they” don’t: I do.
Candace has been fundamentally dishonest and has gaslit her own right-wing audience. She lied about her sexuality and entire lifestyle. At that point, what do you really know about Candace Owens?
Think about what it means that someone this duplicitous and compromised is the number one political podcaster and biggest regular streamer on YouTube, with full backing from the establishment. Candace Owens has never been de-banked, has full monetization on every platform, never faced any real censorship, and enjoys privileges nobody else half as extreme as her gets.
This is an existential battle for the soul of conservatism, criticism of Israel, and Christian nationalism. Candace Owens has the biggest platform to represent these ideas politically online, like it or not.
When many normal people think of these concepts, Candace comes to mind. All of that has been based on lie after lie.
You will decide if that should continue.
If you wish to support groundbreaking research, subscribe here on Substack or donate on BuyMeACoffee or SupertipGG.
BTC: bc1qpt4n05x2xvv4vxjzdhepuukrs9effdjhhcug4c
ETH: 0xc4B7e14906aCB453443e0B757b9776e91d061F8A
Full disclosure: I have no backers. I haven't been paid a single cent for this, and no one told me to. In fact, this story has cost me a fair share of my own money.
I have never spoken to anyone at Daily Wire or Turning Point USA. I am independent; this is my story alone.
Candace Owens is a public figure; these usernames are on public accounts, and I have meticulously censored anything that could be considered truly private information.
Candace Owens Is A Lesbian Who Cheated On Her Husband George Farmer - Chapter 1
Candace Amber Owens is a lesbian. Candace has four separate lesbian dating accounts. That includes one last logged into in early 2022, while married with kids. These are the facts; the direct evidence and context bolstering them are indisputable.
Candace Owens repeatedly uses incredibly specific usernames: Candamo429, Cdot429, CdotAmber, and CdotAmber429. All of these usernames are unique to Candace Owens, except “Cdot429,” which only one person uses on Xbox and eBay, unrelated to Candace.
Using digital forensics / OSINT, a 2016 leak reveals that Candace Owens had three different gay dating profiles on AdultFriendFinderX and one on Fling in a 2011 leak. For clarity, “Adult Friend Finder” and “Friend Finder X” are the same site; the two are interchangeable because the sites merged at some point.
These usernames are extremely unique because they’re a portmanteau of Candace Owens’ first, middle, and last names, along with her birthdate. 429 is the 29th day of the fourth month (April). Candace originally went by “Candace Amber” online.
Account 1: LickyouinRI
The first account is named “LickyouinRI.” It requests “LETS PLAYYYY.” Candace notes that she is a college student in Rhode Island living in Narragansett. This timeline matches her time and place in academia.
Candace Owens, someone her fans claim is an undefeated warrior challenging the “Khazarian Mafia” who rules our society, goes on an extended rant about eating box in the exact tone of Chris Chan, proposing: “I just wanna have sex and eat pussy all night. I love licking clit, and I consider myself to be very good at it,” soliciting a gal-pal.
The language is conspicuous too. Candace fancies herself a tongue magician, implying she has done this with other women before and desires satiating female genitalia.
To contrast, imagine Tucker Carlson having a gay dating profile where he talks about “eating dick all night, I love giving head, and I consider myself to be very good at swallowing penis.” He would rightfully be the laughingstock of the political world, as should Candace!
This specific “URI.EDU” email is directly linked to Candace Owens. “Candamo” is short for Candace Amber Owens, and “429” represents her birthday, April 29th. The same EDU email was linked to a MySpace account that bears Candace Owens’ name and picture.
The MySpace picture in question is an exclusive photo found nowhere else on the internet through Google or Yandex reverse image search. It comes from Candace Owens’ appearance in the music video of “Young Steff - Professional.” Notably, it’s not a frame from the video, but an exclusive swaggy photograph of Candace Owens with Young Steff.
Account 2: collegefuck5 (right-click +new tab to expand)
The second account, “collegefuck5,” offers further insight, exclaiming, “Lets Fuckk.” Candace Owens last used her most in-depth profile (with a picture of her stomach, with her hips visible) as late as January 12th, 2022, an entire 2.5 years after her marriage to George Farmer!
Candace states, “Interested in meeting up and fucking...I like to lick, and I’m sure anyone will enjoy,” while requesting a threesome with explicitly two women.
On Adult Friend Finder, you can set it to be a couple with a female and a male. Despite listing as “bisexual.” Candace leaves men out of it. All of Candace’s accounts only show desire in girls. Multiple list themselves as “lesbian.”
This account is linked to another cdotamber429 email, which (ironically) matches her Flickr account. Candace is pictured with her panties lowered, exposing her hips, but not enough to reveal any nudity.
Extremely oddly, Candace lists her ethnicity as “East Indian,” which is crazy. Candace is Abyssinian dark in this; she’s not fooling anyone.
Candace notes this because she wants to conceal her identity and partly because her family comes from the island of St. Thomas, which historically had around 600 Hindus. Foundational Black Americans have called out Candace Owens for years over how she identifies as Caribbean rather than Black or African, and this completely vindicates them.
This account is direct proof that Candace Owens cheated on her husband. Milo Yiannopoulos, Candace’s close friend, asserts in leaked audio that he has a sex tape of her in a lesbian extramarital affair.
This adultery occurred four years after her marriage & a year after having her first child, while she was 4-5 months pregnant with her 2nd child. Candace was 32 years old; this wasn’t a teen experimenting; this was an adult woman committing an act of infidelity.
Under Catholicism, particularly the traditional version Candace claims to subscribe to, this clearly constitutes cheating. From Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount, Matthew 5:28: "Everyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart.” You don’t have to be Christian; being on a dating account while dating, let alone married, is cheating on some level.
This account appears to be Candace Owens’ main lesbian dating account for affairs.
There is no bar to deleting a Friend Finder account. Logging in and not deleting your account as a married woman is a choice; it’s easy to prevent.
For the record, I tried out deleting an account on the dating website Candace used. It takes four clicks to delete a FriendFinder X account. You don’t need access to the email you registered under.
A guide on how to do this is the first Google search result. What’s the logic behind Candace logging into a nearly two-decade-old dating account, yet not easily deleting it as a married woman?
Account 3: cdot429
The third account is titled “cdot429” and is registered to an email containing “candamo429.” This is Candace Owens’ original YouTube username. Its location is listed as Stamford, Connecticut. It also gives the height of 5’6, which matches Candace’s.
Candace Owens’ third account self-describes as “lesbian,” stating an intention to “Fuck, Lick, And Play.” This account is linked to her hometown. Candace uses a username she has used elsewhere and repeatedly uses her first, middle, and last name, along with her date of birth.
Candace only lists a sexual interest in women. This theme recurs across all her dating accounts. Candace consistently shows a longing to give cunnilingus.
Candace Owens might be a relatively common name, but there’s only a single “Candace Owens” from Stamford, Connecticut, a small city of 139k, who was in her late teens / early 20s at the time. No other “Candace Owens” attended the University of Rhode Island in the 2000s, let alone with the 1/365 birthday of April 29th or “429.”
Account 4: Letmelickyou13
This account led me to find all the others. I found this account years ago, in late 2023, but dismissed it as a possible glitch or, at a minimum, something I couldn’t fully prove. When I rediscovered this along with the other evidence, it turned out to be accurate.
Saying Candace Owens is a lesbian is obviously a big claim, and a leak of an account from 15 years ago without other proof wouldn’t be sufficient. Later, when I found this leak again, I explored the other dating accounts, particularly the bios, linked emails, and usernames; it then corroborated this profile.
You can't “see” this account, so it’s naturally less “passionate,” but we can see the 2011 Fling data breach that details it. Fling doesn’t show historic accounts the same way Adult Friend Finder does.
The name includes the “licking” theme of Candace Owens’ other accounts. The Fling leak shows whether you listed interest in women and men, or just one. Candace explicitly stated that she was only interested in females.
The IP is specifically assigned to the University of Rhode Island, where Candace Owens attended in 2008. Most of the time, IP addresses show a general location or minute details, like whether it’s a residential IP address or a VPN. However, because academia gained internet access so early, these institutions could grab IPv4 addresses before IPv6 was introduced in 1995.
A university IP address is registered specifically to the institution rather than via an ISP. This makes the IP distinct; using a hotel or gas station’s internet access doesn’t show in data leaks that you accessed it that way. A university IP is very precise.
The 100k Bounty—Proving Candace Owens’ Lesbian Dating Profiles And Further Evidence - Chapter 2
To briefly summarize, everything matches. The email contains Candace Owens’ full name and birthday. Those emails and usernames link to her social media and other data leaks. The locations match exactly where Candace Owens was during that period 20 years ago. It even includes a University of Rhode Island IP address and email address, which is where Candace attended during that time.
Candace Owens’ YouTube channel is under the hyper-specific “Candamo429.” It features a video with the University of Rhode Island in the title, detailing the systemic abuse of illicit adderall by Candace Owens, which includes her voice, Candace Owens in a cop uniform, and her name in the credits. See the video below.
Coming full circle, Candace Owens further confirmed this was her YouTube and username by publishing an article on her liberal Degree180 blog under her “Candace Amber” name detailing how to get illicit adderall along with how she did so at her time at the University of Rhode Island.
This establishes the link between Candace Owens and “Candamo429” and “cdotamber429” emails and usernames. This is particularly telling because the emails are directly associated with the same towns Candace lived in pre-college and during college, along with her first, middle, and last name, and her birthday, April 29th.
All of these appear in the email, the username, or both. The only one I don’t show is the URI.EDU one, because the URI.EDU part is more relevant than the email address, which is one of the ones above. In that case, it can be linked to Candace Owens’ social media, and I’m happy to show the evidence elsewhere.
The emails and dating profiles are all connected to a “Candace Amber Owens” from Stamford, Connecticut, who attended the University of Rhode Island (including a .edu email) around 2007-2008. That aligns perfectly with when Candace Owens attended URI.
Candace’s dating accounts have a creation date between 2007 and 2008. Using OSINT, three of these usernames and emails are confirmed to have been the same since 2016, with the Fling dating profile dating to 2011 via data breaches. That’s 15 year old data.
Using the Friend Finder dating website itself, multiple accounts haven’t been accessed since 2007-2008. That means Candace or anyone else couldn’t have touched the accounts, let alone changed them, in almost 20 years.
The dating site doesn’t allow you to turn off the “last visited” feature, so the profiles couldn’t have been altered later, except for potentially the 2022 one, which has the same username and email contained in the Adult Friend Finder 2016 leak.
Since 2022 matches the other three in fetishes, interests, and usernames, the hacking theory is extremely unlikely. Ultimately, the story wouldn’t change, and the narrative would be consistent.
Searching public indexes, I found five living people from Connecticut named “Candace Owens”; three are over 50 years old, and one is over 40 years old. A “Candace Danielle Owens” appears to have briefly lived in Stamford, now lives in Maryland, and was born seven months later, in November. She works in a different field than Candace and hasn’t lived in Connecticut since the 90s.
There is only one “Candace Amber Owens” from Stamford, Connecticut, and that one was born on April 29th.
The actual Candace Owens discussed in this article removed herself from indexes in 2016-2017. None of the other theoretical candidates have a middle name starting with A, except one who’s 65+. Candace Amber Owens is a very unique name; her birth year and location further narrow the possibilities to a single person.
You don’t need digital forensics to confirm this. However, the digital forensics, dating profile details, and email address, along with her dating profile name that includes Candace Owens’ exact birthday, 100% verify it.
Much of this info was already out there if you knew where to look. The relevant usernames and emails in this exposé appeared on the third page of Candace’s Kiwi Farms thread on April 13th, 2016, one day after Social Autopsy launched.
That thread gets into “Candamo429” and her associated emails. This email has been known for a decade; just nobody with my acumen looked into it.
How to Debunk Candace Owens’ Gay Dating Profiles
For all “Candace Intelligence Agency” agents, here’s a guide on how to disprove my claims. I’m willing to pay 100000$ to anyone who can prove all of the dating accounts are fake.
No, pointing out she had multiple kids isn’t empirical evidence, as IVF or other methods exist. If Candace deletes the accounts, that doesn’t disprove what I saw or the nearly two decade-old data leaks. Candace abusing community notes doesn’t count either.
To debunk Candace’s gay dating profile, you also need to enumerate Candace Owens’ 2009 Twitter “Candace_Amber.” Then, her 2015 Flickr account (with dozens of photos of her, including with her ex-Jewish boyfriend) was also named “Cdotamber.” Then articulate why both mirror the username and email Candace used on FriendFinder X to find women.
You would also need to explain the 2008 YouTube channel with her “Candamo429” username, which has an exclusive video that contains her voice, likeness, and full name. This channel has been documented since 2016.
You would need to expound on Candace Owens’ 2008 lesbian Fling profile leak, which originally leaked in 2011. It uses the same “Candamo429” email that matches her usernames. It also includes a public IP that specifically originates from the University of Rhode Island, which aligns exactly with when Candace Owens attended URI.
The Explore Talent leak, connected to a Candamo429 email, also links to the same phone number Candace Owens used to register Degree180. Substack TOS is very strict about phone numbers, so I can’t show a single digit. The phone number in the ICANN lookup of Degree180, Candace Owens’ original website, is linked to the email in one of her Adult Friend Finder and Fling profiles.
Most damning of all is arguably the URI.EDU email. It features the same “Candamo” with her birthday. It’s directly linked to Candace Owens’ decades-old Myspace that contains a never-before-seen picture of her. The evidence linking everything together is irrefutable.
For this to be fake, you’d need to hack three of Candace Owens’ emails. That includes her EDU email. Then spoof the IP without using a VPN, along with spoofing the University of Rhode Island’s IP.
You would also need to know her exact location and birthday when it wasn’t public. On top of that, you'd have to magically copy all the passwords she used on other sites, as she uses two passwords repeatedly.
All while she was a no-name college student. This would have to be done in 2007-2008, almost two decades ago.
The data leaks for Fling and Adult Friend Finder far predate Candace Owens’ servitude to the state of Israel, before going 180 in the other direction. So the idea that Israel is somehow behind planting this doesn’t begin to make sense, unless Israel invented a time machine to smear Candace retroactively.
Unfortunately, I can’t disprove the existence of an Israeli-French time machine specifically designed to troll Candace Owens. Having said that, it’d still be hard to access her EDU email or find an exclusive picture of her stomach that no AI detector flags as AI. You would also need to know Candace Owens’ height, which wasn’t public information in 2008.
The Fling leak dates to 2011, and the Adult Friend Finder leak dates to October 2016. Candace’s original identity post-Social Autopsy, “Red Pill Black,” was founded around July 2017. Social Autopsy and Degree 180 were separate projects that received scorn, but in April 2016.
The dating accounts predate this by eight to nine years. The Fling leak with the same info (email, join date, passwords, location) predates this by five years, in 2011.
Those are just the leaks. Multiple accounts haven’t been accessed since 2007-2008, making it impossible for them to have been altered.
Additionally, for any deranged conspiracy theorist wanting to paint this as an elaborate ruse conducted by me, you need to articulate how this could have been done in 2007-2008 when I was under 18 years of age. It’d need to be faked in time for the 2011 Fling leak.
Such an operation would require waiting nearly 20 years for that day, logging in periodically for almost two decades, and hoping for multiple dating-website data leaks. Also, somehow obtaining an untraceable picture of Candace Owens’ tummy that isn’t found anywhere else on the internet.
Needless to say, Candace Owens’ lesbian dating profile isn’t up for debate; it’s confirmed real.
I’m willing to debate Candace Owens on a platform of her choosing on the contents of this article, including her dating profiles. If I’m making this up, surely she can obliterate me in a conversation. I have no media training, no stream, no podcast, and all the pressure would be on me.
Candace Owens is free to sue me for defamation over her dating profiles. I’m happy to enter discovery to get all this on the court record, along with more. I’d love to obtain her sapphic serenades.
The answer is simple: Candace Owens was still using her hook-up dating profile while wedded to George Farmer. There’s no reason for a married Christian woman with children to access such sexual dating accounts, let alone log in and refuse to delete them.
The Legal Implications of Candace Owens and George Farmer’s Marriage Being Fake
Legally, if the union Candace Owens entered into with George Farmer was false, George Farmer could be liable for deportation. Recently, Milo was deported despite technically being married, because he was in a marriage that he publicly renounced.
Candace Owens and George Farmer’s marriage was based on Christianity, and later Catholicism. Assuming Candace’s marriage was never consummated by her husband, it’d be fraudulent from the start—which appears to be the case based on the timeline and allegations—and it would encompass marital fraud.
One of the key aspects of marital fraud is money; the illegal alien pays or financially backs the US citizen, which would be the case, seeing as George Farmer funds Candace Owens. Credible allegations against George Farmer date back to 2019 and continued after. Candace Owens logged into her dating account in 2022 and possibly before. DHS should investigate.
This scandal’s religious angle is explored more in depth in the next section. Naturally, a large number of the people reading this won’t be Catholic or Christian, but it’s necessary to scrutinize.
Candace Owens professes a Catholic worldview. She invokes God constantly and engages in theological debates. It’s central to Candace Owens’ entire brand.
If Candace Owens and George Farmer have never consummated their marriage, within Catholicism, this is direct grounds for religious annulment and nullification as per the Code of Canon Law, 1084 §1.
Her dating profiles show no sexual interest in men. The 6th Commandment is “Thou shalt not commit adultery.”
It’s the duty of Father Julian Large and Father Michael Lang, who baptized Candace Owens, to investigate this. If found true, it’s on them to annul her illegitimate marriage and make a formal declaration of nullity.
The Coconut Tree: Existing In The Context Of All In Which You Live
This is all I could find. Candace Owens could easily be on a dozen different homosexual dating sites, which, given the fact that she had four accounts across two sites, seems likely. You never know which dating websites may experience a data breach.
I couldn’t find any evidence that Candace Owens was straight or actually enjoyed being with men. Has she had boyfriends? Yes, at least one Jewish one, and one she was dating immediately before meeting George Farmer, named Ryan.
I personally don’t believe Candace Owens is bi; none of her dating profiles denote a sexual interest in men. Candace seems to feel the need to be straight out of necessity, not enjoyment; otherwise, why log in while married?
All of Candace Owens’ dating profiles are incredibly homosexual. She specifies she’s exclusively interested in pursuing women, with no mention of men.
Candace isn’t looking for a “69” or to have her privates licked; she is explicitly saying she wants to eat other women's vaginas. Whether or not she’s bisexual or lesbian would be immaterial to the hypocrisy; however, she is evidently very gay.
If Candace Owens had any straight dating profiles, I would gladly give that context. She has no straight dating profiles I could find, only gay ones that are soliciting encounters with women.
Candace cannot just go, “Oh, I checked into my dating account in 2022 to check out my past sins.” You would delete your accounts, and that wouldn’t discount Candace proudly wanting to lick vaginas prior. It seems she was unsatisfied in her current relationship.
Candace Owens is a lesbian; she continued this behavior into 2022, three years after being married and after having kids. Throughout the years, Candace has been very “handsy” with other women.
This picture from one of Candace Owens’ baby showers appears to date from early to mid-2022, presumably around May. AI says it’s from her Instagram on April 24, but there’s no way to prove that, as Candace regularly clears her Instagram, and I don’t base my claims on AI.
Normally, seeing two women like this, I wouldn’t assume much; it’s not proof of anything. Women will touch each other in ways men cannot imagine.
However, seeing as this was a few months after Candace Owens last logged into her lesbian dating account, it’s pretty wild. Obviously, this isn’t evidence itself that Candace Owens is a lesbian, but it’s bizarre given the wider context.
A closeted lesbian trying to reform shouldn’t be touching another woman this way while at her own baby shower. If you’re truly trying to repent as a Christian, you wouldn’t do this.
Candace Owens put her hedonistic sexual desires before respecting her loving family and children. Candace’s overinflated ego resents having to “act straight” and hide her repressed desires.
Candace Owens shouldn’t be on dating websites searching for gay sex when her child is a baby, and she’s pregnant with another. It betrays her worldview, her children, and all her fans.
Perhaps more inexplicable, Candace Owens has been on camera getting macked on by one of her gal-pals. Candace, a self-described lesbian, has a woman wrapped around her, going lips mode. If it were one peck on the cheek, that’d be less peculiar, but there’s about a half dozen in 14 seconds.
Every single dating profile connected to Candace Owens is solely lesbian oriented, interested in strictly homosexual acts. Although some refer to being bisexual, not a single account out of the four lists any interest in men or solicits them, with two being exclusively “lesbian.”
One could speculate that Candace Owens’ blitzkrieg against Brigitte Macron is simply the most arduous and expensive attempt in history to obtain nudes. I’m just proposing a theory.
Candace Owens says all the time, “What frustrates people most about me is we [my family] are remarkably boring, we have a consistent family life, we do most of our stuff with the church and our church friends,” while calling out Donald Trump. There’s nothing banal about logging into your gay dating account as a married woman with kids.
Candace accuses others, like Taylor Swift, of being secret lesbians in “lavender marriages.” This was later completely debunked. Candace claims countless people are in-the-closet gays or swingers, with no evidence. This reveals that Candace Owens’ entire identity is built on falsely accusing others of what she herself is.
Candace herself is in a “lavender marriage.” Notwithstanding an agreement with George Farmer for an open relationship, under the Catholic framework Candace espouses, it would be adultery, or in other words, cheating. George Farmer is allowing Candace to scandalize herself by permitting this.
Candace Owens’ own family has called her out for being totally duplicitous. She holds different public and private positions.
Candace privately supports gay and trans rights. Candace encouraged her lesbian cousin in her gay marriage. In 2023, Candace’s gay cousin pointed out that her posturing is a “front” for her conservative audience, or what’s colloquially known as grifting.
This article itself is proof that the accusations Candace Owens has made about the Israeli-French legionnaire assassination plot against her are fake. That should be a given: there's no police report, the FBI says it received no such info, and Candace was repeatedly lollygagging in public the next month. Nearly a year later, Candace still hasn't provided a shred of evidence about this plot.
How exactly could a random anonymous poster on X find this dirt on Candace Owens in 10 minutes of looking, but not the French intelligence service DGSE, Mossad, or any other group? I’m just a nobody, yet I outdid these trillion-dollar countries?
The answer is that Candace Owens isn’t a real threat to power; if she were, these state actors could have released the proof in this article long ago. The notion that I, some private citizen, can obtain this info on Candace Owens with ease, yet multiple world governments must deal with her via plotted transnational murder is self-defeating.
If there was some plan to murder Candace, multiple global powers(or private intelligence firms) could have weaponized this with her to begin with to silence her. Why jump to “let’s kill Candace Owens in a globe-spanning conspiracy” over much easier methods? Simply put, at a minimum, they'd run a PR campaign to discredit her.
To address some possible criticisms, such as whether Candace Owens gave birth to her children. Obviously, yes, she’s been visibly pregnant multiple times, but IVF negates that. The argument isn’t that they are not her kids or George Farmer’s. That is an argument Milo Yiannopoulos made against her, not one I support.
Another criticism is that “Candace Owens being LGBTQ doesn’t matter.” Factually, it matters to Candace; she branded herself a “trad wife.” Candace advertises herself heavily to Christian moms, including hosting theology debates with her allegedly homosexual husband. The next section details all of this. Candace gives speeches at Catholic events, such as “Catholics for Catholics” in 2026.
What I expect most would be “but this doesn’t discredit her criticism of Israel.” Actually, it does; Candace is compromised.
A Hebrew-speaking Zionist runs Candace’s business. Candace takes money from a friend of Benjamin Netanyahu, Oracle owner Larry Ellison. Candace is being blackmailed with sex tapes by an illegal immigrant federal agent who claimed to be connected to Mossad on her own show. This is detailed extensively later on.
This revelation raises questions: why should you trust Candace Owens at all, and do we even know who Candace Owens really is?
Why Candace Owens Being a Lesbian Who Cheated On Her Husband Matters - Chapter 3
This should be self-explanatory, but I understand there’s a large demographic of female Candace Owens fans who are more socially liberal. Presumably, they’re not pro-cheating, but there are different levels of guilt and hypocrisy. Candace has explicitly stated that if her child came out as LGBTQ, she would “beat them with a cane.”
Your average Israel-critical viewer watching Candace, conservative or not, may think that if Candace were fooling around at 18, it would be permissible. Candace promoted their worldview: ‘what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.’
In fairness to Candace Owens, if it were just bisexual dating profiles she made in 2007-2008 when she was 18-19, it’d still be news, but it would matter far less. The fact that she accessed one of the gay dating accounts in 2022, did not delete it, and has a career of being a queer-bashing Christian-Conservative firebrand changes things.
Candace includes her wedding photos and a picture of one of her pregnancies in her intro. Candace does podcast appearances with her husband talking about family and Catholicism. On Instagram, Candace posts trad larp videos, performatively making steak for her “sexist” husband with her kids crying in the background, while she rants about how White people don’t season their steaks enough.
Candace proudly champions a traditional Catholic worldview, including on marriage. Candace was a key figure promoting “Christ is King.”
Candace Owens has attacked Erika Kirk for being disloyal as a Catholic wife, which she considers a “betrayal.” Candace articulates a Catholic view of marriage: a holy sacrament, a sacred oath, and a union entered into under God.
Whatever your opinion on Erika Kirk and the PR around her might be, if her main critic, Candace, is fooling around on her man to lick vaginas, it discredits criticism of Erika. Cheating on your spouse breaks the covenant of marriage infinitely more than not approving of how a widow honors her late husband’s legacy.
Regardless of denomination, Matthew 1:24-25 is crystal clear. Candace Owens and George Farmer have a fraudulent marriage that has no validity if they lacked consummation or if it was under pretenses.
George Farmer and Candace Owens’ entire marriage is a lie that goes against the Catholic Church, all Christian teaching, and God himself. That’s devastating given Farmer’s Christian theology degree.
As stated earlier, Jesus is clear in Matthew 5:28. Just by using her dating profile, that would be adultery regardless of any action. Leviticus 20:10 clarifies the charge for adultery, which shows how extreme it is.
1 Corinthians 6:9-10 details that Candace’s unrepentant behavior bars her from inheriting the kingdom of God. “Do not be deceived; neither the immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor robbers will inherit the kingdom of God.”
The Catholic Church has an entire webpage dedicated to explaining how this would be cheating. Adultery under a Catholic framework is always cheating; they may not use that specific word, but the intent behind the meaning is clear. This isn’t Catholic theology alone; essentially, all Christian theology is along these lines.
If Candace hadn’t logged into her dating profile in 2022, I likely would have dealt with this privately. That being said, I have no way to contact George Farmer; he’s rather elusive.
Beyond just the religious or family aspects, it’s key to break this down one by one to explain why this entire scandal has huge ramifications not just for the conservative political space, but for the streaming space as a whole.
An August 2026 Harvard-Harris poll details the political aspect (page 36). With this in mind, it was a loaded question about Candace Owens hating Jews: she received 27% support from Republicans, 24% from Democrats, and 24% from independents in a pool of 2100 registered voters. HH polling has been the most reliable pollster in 2020 and 2024, getting 5/7 battleground states in 2024 and coming within 1.6% of the actual results.
Candace Owens is one of the biggest podcasters in the world, consistently ranking within the top 15 on Spotify in the US when she’s not on break. Candace regularly has YouTube livestreams with 50,000 to 300,000 viewers. If you check the stream website charts on the days that she’s on, she’s in the top five and number one in English (unless there’s an event or IShowSpeed is streaming).
Kai Cenat averages about 60-70k on Twitch. Hasan Piker averages about 25-40k on Twitch. IShowSpeed averages about 30-50k on Twitch and 90-250k on YouTube, dual-streaming on both sites. Currently the most popular streamer on Twitch, Nix, gets 35-180k while streaming his main game, DOTA 2.
Even with conservative estimates, Candace is undeniably in the top 10 streamers on the internet across all platforms. In the political space, Candace is the most-viewed streamer by 2-3x.
In contrast, someone like Tucker Carlson has a slightly higher podcast ranking, but only hits about 2.5 thousand to 50 thousand live. As of February 2026, Candace and Tucker had similar numbers of videos on YouTube, both in the 1600 range, but Candace has 10% more total views and around 600 thousand more subscribers.
That’s despite Tucker posting 50% more than Candace, but he only has about a 15% monthly advantage in views. On average, Candace gets 840 thousand views per episode, whereas Tucker Carlson gets about 714 thousand views per upload, including clips.
In August 2026, Tucker gained 30k subs in a month, and Candace did too, with Tucker releasing 13 episodes and Candace releasing 11. That’s even though Tucker releases about 5.8x the number of clips Candace does (105 versus 18).
In August 2026, Ben Shapiro's YouTube videos average about 30k to 500k, with most around 100k to 200k. Tucker Carlson averaged between 350k and 2 million per episode. Candace Owens averages 1.2 million to 2 million per episode in August 2026, ignoring her debate, which got over 5.7 million. Despite audience overlap, Candace crushes her competitors.
By views, Candace is ostensibly the leading conservative podcaster and easily the largest anti-Zionist podcaster. Now, is she the biggest podcaster in the world as she claimed? No, that’s never been the case.
During the brief time following Charlie Kirk’s assassination, Candace had the highest number of downloads and views per episode. That has fallen since, but she remains roughly in the top 10 for downloads and views per episode. That is different from being a top 10 podcaster overall, though.
As this article reveals, cafeteria Catholic Candace appears to spend time between the legs of women behind George and her children’s backs. To quote Candace directly, “I will always survive a daylight test.” Perhaps that’s true, if the daylight is a morning star.
Candace herself invokes God nonstop and involves religion in everything. Candace regularly claims others are homosexual as an insult with no evidence, and one of her key catchphrases is “fake and gay.”
Candace has so prominently occupied that phrase that she sells a “fake and gay” line of merch. Scanning her YouTube transcript, she has said the expression “fake and gay” 70 times in total as of August 2026.
Context is required to understand the degree of manipulation at play with Candace Owens and her philosophy. Large portions of Candace Owens’ career are based around claiming to be an anti-feminist holier-than-thou Christian trad wife, lobbing LGBTQ accusations, and conspiracy mongering.
One of Candace’s most popular tweets is complaining that you’re a lost soul if you find power in “popping your vagina into another woman’s vagina.”
Everything Candace projects onto others applies to her a hundred times over. Candace is a house of cards, kept together only by her outward inertia.
Candace Owens appears to despise her husband. The more male-brained readers should understand that women often signal their frustration with their partner in subtle, indirect ways, often through humiliation.
Rather than moderating given her homosexual infidelity, Candace publicly posted her traditional Latin Rite Catholic baptism with her family. Normally, this would be wholesome. Given that she’s a lesbian who cheated on her husband, it’s downright evil.
Candace often retorts that her female critics are jealous of her marriage, using her husband like a trophy. Most people wouldn’t wish George Farmer’s fate on their worst enemy.
Is there anything more feminist than being a non-monogamous lesbian who cheats on her conservative husband? That’s not to imply all lesbians are feminists, but the worship of the female body and soul is core to being a feminist. Feminist thinkers have argued this for decades, particularly during the second wave.
Candace Owens’ 2nd book is “Make Him a Sandwich - Why Real Women Don’t Need Fake Feminism.” This book attempts to rebrand feminism in a conservative context involving traditional marriage, embracing patriarchal roles, and respecting men above all else.
In a sense, Candace wants to “return” to first-wave feminism. Candace surprisingly praises first-wave feminism in her supposedly anti-feminist book (according to reviewers). Amusingly, Candace parodied second-wave feminist leader Gloria Steinem to promote her screed.
The philosophy of the second and third waves of feminism that Candace is trying to dismantle is, in many ways, how she lives her real life. Pivotal feminists like Simone de Beauvoir saw non-monogamy as a way of liberating oneself from patriarchy. De Beauvoir promoted open relationships, terming them “authentic love,” and used freedom to justify the concept.
To this day, feminists like Jo Piazza talk about how cheating on your husband or boyfriend is a form of feminist “self-care” and regaining power. Surveys show that millennial women, like Candace, are among the first group of ladies in history to have a ten percent higher rate of cheating than their male spouses.
During her time working under Ben Shapiro, Candace Owens denounced women cheating on their spouses over the internet. Candace considered model Emily Ratajkowski having lewd photos of herself up to constitute cheating that was scandalizing her husband.
Albeit only her hips and stomach are visible, a lesbian dating profile you logged into as a married woman would both fit and surpass Candace’s definition.
Accessing a lesbian dating profile is a much more direct form of marital misconduct than having racy photos up. Candace was a married, traditional Catholic; Ratajkowski is Jewish and had only a boyfriend.
What is the actual distinction between Candace Owens and your stereotypical, patriarchy-hating, blue-haired feminist she spent her career deriding? The only difference is that Candace is fundamentally dishonest, wears a conservative coat of paint, and there’s a decent chance that the feminist is straight, unlike Candace.
Despite this, Candace has a whole “Make Him a Sandwich” merch line, including a $45 apron made in China that you can otherwise get for $5.
Candace Owens spends a large portion of her career accusing others of being gay or trans with zero evidence. It’s her bread and butter, to the point that she sells overpriced merch on it. This ranges from Emmanuel Macron to Hugh Jackman to Erika Kirk to Taylor Swift to Eminem (who has been married multiple times).
Candace’s beliefs were different before. In 2017, she made numerous early videos expressing her support for gay rights. On Joe Rogan in 2018, Candace said she supported gay marriage. In 2019, at the Chabad Center in Aspen, she bashed the gay community for calling her a “house negro.”
Since at least 2022, Candace Owens has been vocally opposed to gay marriage, with Candace stating she believes in the nuclear family and, in 2023, openly proclaimed, “I am not an ally of the gay community.” It’s hard to be an “ally” when you’re part of it.
In any case, Candace delineates the gay community as “obnoxious,” “annoying,” and “perverse.” Candace openly implored her audience to “never be an ally to” homosexuals. Meanwhile, during all of this, Candace was seeking lesbian rendezvous.
If you check the transcript of Candace Owens’ YouTube just for the last year and a half for mentioning key words, you get: “gay” over 170 times, lesbian over 28 times, trans over 100 times, LGBT 25 times, LGBTQ over 45 times, and homosexual 55 times.
If you average that out, in roughly 600 days, Candace Owens mentions homosexuality in some form every 2nd day. Averaged out, Candace mentions the LGBTQ community roughly 1.2 times per episode.
By contrast, Candace Owens has said “marxist” 13 times, “Marx” four times, and “socialist” 14 times in over 380 episodes. That wouldn’t be worth focusing on, but if you look at Candace Owens’ earlier work at TPUSA, Daily Wire, or PragerU, she mentions those ideologies and concepts once per episode, if not more.
Candace Owens has compared homosexuality to a meth addiction. Candace said that gay people shouldn’t be allowed to raise families—if you’re engaging in a homosexual lifestyle as a married woman, that applies to you too.
Candace Owens has equated homosexuality with sociopathy. This article isn’t pathologizing mental health—however, it’s an unequivocal fact that by Candace’s standards, due to being a lesbian, she would be a sociopath.
One of Candace Owens’ most prominent beefs is with fellow conservative commentator Nick Fuentes. Candace’s main talking point, which she has deployed for months, is accusing Nick Fuentes of being gay with no evidence provided. Not a critique of his opinions, worldview, or his behavior, but a personal attack with no proof.
Candace has set the standard that making gay accusations, true or false, is fair game. Whatever you think about Nick Fuentes, it’s Candace Owens who has four dating profiles detailing gratuitous homosexual acts.
Candace expects her audience to take her at face value without any proof. Here’s a five-minute compilation of Candace “lesbOwens” implying and later directly accusing Nick Fuentes of being gay.
Candace Owens has accused Jeremy Boreing of being a “closeted gay psychopath.” Due to this, I looked into Jeremy the way I did for Candace Owens; no homosexual dating profiles appeared.
If there’s actual evidence Jeremy Boreing is a closeted sodomite, I would gladly post that and out him as I have with Candace Owens. However, there’s zero evidence.
Candace makes baseless assertions, accusing others of being closeted with no evidence, while being closeted herself. Jeremy is an ordained minister with a child; this type of speculative calumny speaks to Candace’s self-hatred.
The fact stands that there are multiple pieces of confirmed evidence proving that Candace Owens is gay and still engages in that lifestyle as of 2022. Candace has yet to provide a single dating profile or any direct evidence proving Nick Fuentes or Jeremy Boreing to be gay.
Candace disingenuously maintains she never plays dirty, never makes personal attacks; it’s always her family under attack. The only person I see attacking Candace’s family is herself with her woman-on-woman fornication. Just like lesbian domestic abuse rates, they cry out in pain as they strike you.
The bar Candace has set for accusations of homosexuality is so low that you don’t need to show digital forensics or any evidence. If you want to make that accusation, you can’t go off of vibes or humor; if Candace was just flirty in pictures, that obviously wouldn’t be taken seriously.
My standard for accusations of homosexuality is digital forensics, serious non-AI photo evidence, credible court testimony, or a direct admission. Unfortunately, dishonest hacks like Candace Owens or Milo Yiannopoulos have abused these allegations to the point that they mean nothing without hard proof.
Candace, on her Don Lemon appearance, spouted “gay marriage is a sin,” “sodomy is a sin,” “I believe marriage is between a man and a woman.” She told Don Lemon, “he had to deal with it [being gay].” Candace always postures as traditional and Christian, but her personal life couldn’t be more different.
Oddly, in this interview, Candace also denies any friendships she has with gay people, when her public relations manager is gay, and she admits she hires gay people.
There’s no reason to tell such blatant lies unless you’re a compulsive fibber with something to hide, like Candace. It underlines her degree of deceitfulness; she can’t come to terms with reality, so she’s forced to believe the lies she tells herself.
Candace Owens accused the mother of Charlie Kirk’s children of being a lesbian pedophile groomer who was talking inappropriately to minors. I understand why people may criticize Turning Point USA and Erika Kirk; I don't think either is above criticism.
However, asserting that Erika Kirk is a gay pedophile rapist is a disgusting way to exploit the tragedy of Charlie Kirk’s death as a platform for conspiracy. This rhetoric hurts both Charlie Kirk’s legacy and Charlie’s kids. If you actually believe that someone is a threat to children, you contact law enforcement (NCMEC), not make a spectacle on social media about it.
Support Erika Kirk or Turning Point or not, this gossip has nothing to do with “finding the truth behind Charlie’s murder.” In fact, if for some reason, you believe Erika Kirk and TPUSA were involved, this would distract from and cover up that.
I looked into Erika Kirk. She doesn’t have a lesbian dating profile, or, for that matter, four lesbian dating profiles, unlike Candace. If she did, I’d be the first to report it.
Candace screeches that anyone questioning her marriage must be a fed playing a role. The deep state is alogging her! It’s not like she has multiple gay dating profiles and her husband has multiple accusers. What happened to “just asking questions”?
On conspiracy, Candace centers her career on various theories. There is no Candace Owens without speculation on the machinations of “the elite” or what the cabal is doing on the world stage.
Candace is willing to pursue almost any conspiracy. Candace elucidates riveting ideas such as TikTok making men gay, NASA replacing our snow with fake unmeltable snow, flat earth, and denying the moon landing.
Candace Owens has become synonymous with how the mainstream saw Alex Jones a few years ago, but more fringe. She has captured the more extreme elements of the Infowars audience, which is why you see Alex Jones taking shots at her. With Alex Jones, there’s some degree of self-awareness and performance art. With Candace, there’s a sincerity that mirrors True Crime.
To summarize, Mrs. Owens Farmer’s top theories fall into three general camps. Those being: this person is secretly gay/trans, the Jews/Zionists control or fund this, and this person is being blackmailed/it’s a fed cover-up.
The problem is that these conspiracy elements are at play in Candace Owens’ own life. She’s secretly a lesbian. She cheated on her husband, George Farmer. Mossad-connected Milo is blackmailing her with gay sex tapes. Zionists fund her supposedly anti-Zionist operation. These elements are all exposed as you keep reading.
Candace and her brownnosers, such as TikTok researcher Ian Carroll, make grandiose claims about how “real” Candace and George are and that her family is totally normal. Nothing could be further from the truth. Everything about Candace Owens is off, and the proof is in the cream of the pie, or rather, pudding.
If you wish to support groundbreaking research, subscribe here on Substack or donate on BuyMeACoffee or SupertipGG.
BTC: bc1qpt4n05x2xvv4vxjzdhepuukrs9effdjhhcug4c
ETH: 0xc4B7e14906aCB453443e0B757b9776e91d061F8A
Milo Yiannopoulos is Blackmailing Candace Owens So She Can Become President - Chapter 4
Milo Yiannopoulos is a necessary element in this story. Milo now serves as Candace Owens’ ghostwriter, aide, and advisor. The next section comprehensively details this—for now, the blackmail and its ramifications.
Milo is a pedophile illegal immigrant who posted revenge CSAM of a 15 year old in 2025, invited minors to his hotel room in 2017, and has an extensive history of saying 13 year olds can consent while he was in his mid-30s.
Within a month of Milo being reinstated on Twitter, in a post he forgot to delete, he openly bragged about having blackmail on Candace Owens (archive), specifically threatening Candace with “videos and photos”!
Based on what Milo Yiannopoulos himself is claiming, there are videos and photos of Candace Owens engaged in lesbian sex. This is not my speculation or hyperbole; this is Milo, now Candace’s top guy and ghostwriter, asserting he has kompromat on her.
Milo has been on her show twice since and has been cited by Candace countless times since threatening her.
The Candace Tapes exist. There is no conjecture: Milo, by his own admission, is blackmailing Candace Owens with photos and videos of her having homosexual intercourse. There’s not really any other way to interpret this clip.
Milo never alluded to any other dirt he has on her. In the clip itself, Milo brings up only “what drugs people do”, “what they do in the dark” and “what people they fuck” in reference to Candace Owens.
The compulsion to dismiss Milo’s various unproven claims is understandable and warranted; Milo frequently lies. However, her dating profile corroborates Milo’s own allegations about Candace’s sexual deviancy, and obviously “photos and videos” isn’t in reference to her dating profiles. So how did Milo know Candace Owens was a lesbian before everyone else?
How did Milo Yiannopoulos so specifically know that Candace Owens was a lesbian, enough to ardently assert that claim and have the confidence to tell his client at the time, Azealia Banks?
Azealia repeatedly asserted the claim that Candace Owens is a lesbian because Milo promulgated that idea heavily behind the scenes. Azealia only detailed this a month after she and Milo fell out.
It’s worth noting the language of “photos and videos,” not recordings. This directly implies video and pictorial evidence, not just audio. Looking at the data confirms this.
In August 2024, a month later, Milo seemed to allude to information that would “cancel” Candace Owens. What information could get Candace canceled? Perhaps the blackmail he claimed he had two months prior.
Candace's story is tied to Milo. It involves the self-proclaimed Jewish federal agent and illegal immigrant blackmailing Candace Owens.
This resulted from Milo’s grift as Marjorie Taylor Greene’s top guy coming to an end. Milo knew MTG lost, so he shifted gears to a new female political figure to leech off. As Milo ghostwrote MTG’s unreleased book on Christian Nationalism, I wouldn’t be shocked if he ghostwrote Candace’s new book.
Candace Owens’ homosexual proclivity isn’t some secret; in fact, it’s been an unconfirmed open secret for years. Figures such as Dave Reaboi have mentioned the gay rumors about Candace. Milo Yiannopoulos (who she later appeared with repeatedly) called Candace Owens a “dark-skinned dyke” and on numerous occasions implied she was gay.
Milo also referred to Candace’s husband, George Farmer, as a homosexual numerous times (including in dozens of deleted tweets). This implies Milo has some form of blackmail or information about Candace’s husband that she intended to keep hidden.
It’s worth pondering why Candace neglected to bring up attacks against her or her husband during her two interviews with Milo, including an interview on gay people in conservative movements. That would’ve been a perfect time to rescind it if it was untrue.
Following this threat to reveal her sexuality and drug abuse via tapes or photos, Candace enigmatically started working with Milo after describing him previously as “A vindictive psychopath. Utterly void of conscience and lies without qualm.”
What exactly changed Candace’s mind on a Jewish person (Candace, known for her love of Jewish people) who openly tried to ruin her life for years?
Not only that, after waging a multi-year campaign against Candace, Milo is now advocating for Candace Owens to be president of the United States of America!
Milo remarkably got his buddy Tim Pool (directly or indirectly) to push Candace for president on the same day. Mister anti-feminist, anti-black, anti-LGBTQ GamerGate crusader Milo suddenly becomes more progressive than Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders combined when it comes to promoting a Black woman he calls a lesbian into the halls of power. Does that not seem off?
Think about it for a second. Milo, a federal agent, illegal immigrant, and foreigner, wants to push a woman he asserted was a lesbian and bragged about having blackmail on her into becoming president of the United States of America, aka the most powerful person in the world.
This is the playbook Milo used with Marjorie Taylor (traitor) Greene. MTG got her start as a conspiracy blogger, then Milo swooped in once she had political aspirations and became a congresswoman.
Milo knows she’s “prideful, dishonest, and stupid,” along with being popular, and Milo has compromising materials on her. What better candidate could there be than a “stupid” president you can control?
Imagine the leverage Milo has over Marjorie Taylor Greene as her top aide, but multiply that by 100x. Could Candace give Milo legal status? Marjorie was also a podcaster before becoming a congresswoman, and that relationship was likely key in allowing Milo to stay in the US.
Who could be a more ideal puppet than someone who has “never read a book,” bases their opinions solely on who’s funding them, and “goes off the wall” without a producer/management, as Milo said about Candace Owens in November 2024 on Timcast?
According to a deleted Milo tweet from August 31st, 2024, Candace Owens is a “literal retard.” Why would you want a “literal retard” as president, unless you had power over them?
On Russia Today, Candace Owens agreed with Milo’s idea that she should be president, but just not in the short term. Interestingly, Candace refuses to rule the idea out. In the short term, she backs Milo’s good pal, CIA Tucker Carlson, with her seemingly acting as VP or part of his campaign.
On Candace Owens’ own show, Milo bragged about how he’s connected to Israeli intelligence and how they’re blackmailing the American Catholic clergy. In Candace’s own face, Milo is saying, “I know foreign intelligence assets who are blackmailing American catholics.”
Mrs. Noticer has never seen a Jew-related conspiracy she won’t give the time of day. Yet, somehow Candace quickly moves on when Milo brags that Mossad is allegedly keeping blackmail on the Catholic Church for being full of homosexuals?
Does that not seem off? Candace has claimed repeatedly that Mossad has tried to assassinate her. Candace brings on someone on her show she calls a “trusted source,” who claims they’re connected to Mossad and share intelligence with Israeli intelligence.
Despite all this, Candace doesn’t ask questions, doesn’t press further, and quickly changes the topic as if she’s afraid. Milo himself mentioned this on Twitter, saying, “I happen to know, for reasons I can’t get into.” Why can’t you get into why you’re getting intel from Mossad?
When Candace and Milo host a nearly 2-hour show on how they’re both not homosexuals and homosexuals run society, that’s the Milo way of snubbing his nose at the audience.
It’s a humiliation ritual. Milo does these stunts so later, when he stabs his vessel in the back, he can go, “I was showing you the way the entire time.”
Both know the other is a homosexual, but they both deny reality to project their totally real heterosexuality. As evidence will show, Milo hates Candace, and his contingency plan is always something along the lines of trolling his client.
In an extraordinarily meta conversation, Candace Owens and Milo detail how homosexuals, particularly lesbians, are propped up in media. Milo goes into painstaking detail to talk about how the elites use homosexuals because they’re used to playing characters and articulating beliefs they don’t truly hold. This is Milo signaling, “Candace is a lesbian, I am propping her up, and there’s nothing you can do about it.”
At any rate, Milo is protecting homosexual conservatives for his own benefit yet again. If Milo were half the man he claims to be, he could cleanse the conservative movement of this dishonest, hypocritical rot he claims to be against.
Instead, Milo wants to push his careerist homosexual agenda, to have leverage over conservatives via blackmail, because he’s powerless otherwise. All Milo’s tricks are taken from his low-level mobster father’s playbook: deception, blackmail, and extortion. Milo Yiannopoulos is free to prove me wrong and post the Candace tapes he himself claimed to have.
If I’m somehow reading this wrong and Milo doesn’t have Candace Owens’ sex tapes, he’s free to post the “tapes” that relate to who she sleeps with. If Milo doesn’t have Candace Owens’ sex tapes, he can easily debunk this by posting them. If they’re not sex tapes, he can post them.
To prove my point, look no further than the recent Elijah Schaffer scandal. First, Milo texted “Rift TV” owner Elijah, assuming he would be easier to extort under the influence of drugs, a playbook Milo has run before. Milo goes, “I’m your friend; all these mean people have a dossier ready to drop on you, but if you listen to me, I can save you.”
Then Milo starts making demands of Elijah’s former employee, conservative ex-commentator Sarah Stock, then claiming, “Oh, I’m doing you a favor by warning you,” before immediately posting the blackmail he’s supposedly warned her about when she refuses to submit.
Later, Milo attempted to extort Sarah Stock directly. This is a crime under the California Penal Code, but Milo did it openly because he is a paid federal agent with far more legal immunity. That is also why Milo was able to stay in the US for years without a valid visa.
Milo the extortionist said, “I will destroy your life if you return to public life.” That is a textbook case of extortion. Milo then deleted it before issuing a non-apology and threatened further extortion if Sarah or her husband spoke up.
If Milo had just posted all the dirt he had on Sarah Stock, it wouldn’t be a crime. However, attempting to force someone out of public life directly and saying that if they don’t comply, you’ll ruin their life, is illegal.
One’s opinions on Elijah Schaffer, Sarah Stock, or Candace Owens are irrelevant. The point is that this underlines Milo’s modus operandi.
Milo openly extorted Elijah Schaffer, Sarah Stock, and Candace Owens using blackmail, the difference being that Candace Owens complied. Milo habitually blackmails, extorts, and tries to force people to work with him. This isn't speculative conspiracy; Milo Yiannopoulos openly breaks the law. People should ask how he’s allowed to do it and who is funding his campaigns.
Milo openly blackmails people, threatening to release info if they don’t follow his orders, then stretches the truth by using a small nugget of reality. Milo constantly deploys this same playbook. Manipulatively pretending to be someone’s friend, then warns them about something, and concludes with more damaging lies if they don’t immediately stop resisting.
Milo Yiannopoulos, on multiple occasions, attacked Candace Owens and George Farmer’s children over the course of years. Milo claimed Candace’s children aren’t her own, and it’s practically impossible for them to have sex. What kind of Catholic mother and father could tolerate a catty Jewish pederast attacking the foundation of their marriage by trying to discredit their young children?
Disgustingly, Milo posted a picture of Candace’s child attempting to harass an infant. For Milo, the baby wasn’t sexually attractive enough to meet his standards. Milo likes them darker-skinned.
Candace has specifically stated that the only thing really off-limits for her is attacking children in any regard. Presumably, an onslaught against her own children should be an even more unforgivable crime? Yet she allows Milo to degrade her family with not only no pushback from “Mama Bear,” but encouragement.
Milo will never release anything beyond gossip or hearsay. When he does have ammo, it’d hurt his career more to put it out than to use it to extort others. Milo relies on rumors and lies, while blackmailing with real dirt, to get ahead.
Sadly for the haters, Milo has nothing of value to provide except baseless gossip.
To go a step further, quoting a recent excerpt from Milo, the homosexual defending charlatan: “If you’re gay and a republican, I will out you. I will out you, I will fucking out you. Because it’s the right thing to do.” Apparently not if it’s Candace “I love licking clit” Owens!
Most disgustingly of all, with the knowledge that Candace Owens is breaking the 6th Commandment and the 10th Commandment. Milo Yiannopoulos, on the day of the birth of Jesus Christ, disturbingly called for Candace Owens to be canonized as a Catholic Saint.
In other cases, Milo compared Candace Owens, who he knows is a lesbian adultress, to multiple saints, including St.Teresa of Avila. Milo malevolently uses his proclaimed Catholic piety to promote a lying, promiscuous lesbian under the guise of his Christian faith.
Milo wants to canonize Candace, while asserting he has sex tapes that expose her as a homosexual harlot, all the while alleging Candace is in a sham marriage with someone Milo accuses of being gay. This is who Milo wants to immortalize within the Catholic Church. It’s beyond me why any Catholics tolerate Milo when he’s so intent on spitting in the face of the Church.
This propaganda would be Soviet without Milo knowing Candace and George’s sexual deviancy. The fact that he knows and spouts this agitprop is ontologically evil.
Don’t take my word for it. Milo himself pointed out that Candace used “Christ is King” not as sincere religious proselytization, but as a political vehicle. Milo knows that Candace is profiting off politicizing Christianity, yet still promotes her as a Saint.
Milo, who now works with Candace, rightfully points out that Candace Owens is phony. He knows she’s a total fraud to the point that she isn’t playing her own character. This isn’t a case where Milo was fooled or genuinely augmented his opinion.
Milo’s religion is objectively Satanism; he believes in himself alone. Milo willingly pushes homosexuality and adultery within Catholicism for his own benefit, desecrating the Temple of God itself. Milo only truly denounces these things when he can besiege a perceived enemy with them, not as a general principle.
The Hebrew (the language George Farmer speaks) translation of “Satan” is “accuser.” What does Milo love doing most? Making false accusations and mixing partially real accusations with lies.
The reality is, love it or hate it, this article is setting Candace free from her cage. It’s giving Candace the freedom to speak her truth on the illegal immigrant Milo’s repeated public attempts to blackmail her. In that case, a Black woman is speaking; listen and learn.
Regardless of my opinions on Candace Owens, I think that the largest anti-Zionist political commentator being blackmailed by an illegal alien Jewish federal agent, who brags about their contacts within the Mossad, is bad!
This is how Milo treated his Black husband, John, in 2025. Just imagine how Milo treats Candace Owens in private, but she can’t say anything because she’s being blackmailed, as was his husband.
The Candace influencer class stays silent about this illegal alien abusing his spouse and what this illegal alien did to Candace.
It’s worth contemplating: did Milo get this intelligence on Candace Owens and George Farmer being homosexuals from the Mossad? He claimed he had intel on Catholic Bishops in America being homosexual from Israeli intelligence, so is that truly out there? I don’t outright put stock in such a notion; however, I am merely just “asking questions,” much as Candace does.
There is a cabal of influencers complicit in covering up and abetting Milo Yiannopoulos’ blackmailing and extortion of Candace Owens. They are Ian Carroll, Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Buckley Carlson, Clinton Russell, Mel Witte (Villgecrazylady), Ryan Matta, Myron Gaines (Amrou Fudl), Sneako, Carrie Prejean Boller, “ParodyJeffx,” Baron Coleman, Stew Peters, Lionel, DiligentDenizen, James Li, Morgan Ariel, Evan Kilgore, and the entire class of spineless Candace Owens-sycophantic influencers.
The same goes for the YouTube grifters like “Daily Freddo with Kasia,” Jimmy Dore, Jesse on Fire, Trent Out Loud, and “Heavy Duty Country,” who never call out Milo but worship Candace. They’re complicit in the blackmail of Candace Owens until they call out Milo, the Zionist federal agent.
Each of them is free to prove me wrong, and I will remove their name from the list. Until then, all of these people will get the same focus I have given Candace Owens. I would encourage them to reconsider their support. People thought Candace was untouchable, until she wasn’t.
None of these people actually care for Candace Owens; they care about her clout and grifting off her fans. All these talking head grifters will play defense all day, bending over backward to make excuses for Candace Owens’ crackpot theories.
Yet they will never call out Milo Yiannopoulos, a Jewish federal agent with self-proclaimed connections to the Mossad, for openly blackmailing Candace. It’d be worth making an exception if these people also called out Milo, but still grifted off Candace Owens.
Specifically, mister “receipts and evidence” Ian Carroll, the top licker of Candace’s Caribbean clitoris, outright dismissed my thread of receipts on Milo. Ian Carroll, the super sleuth who always goes on about “receipts,” refused to address what he called “ancient history.”
Meanwhile, most of my thread on Milo is about things that happened within the past three years, with Milo sharing CSAM revenge porn of a 15 year old in early 2025. If the receipts on Milo’s pedophilic behavior are “ancient history,” by extension, Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes are prehistoric. Who would buy a defense for pedophilia that “it only happened a few years ago”?
Why is Ian Carroll defending a Mossad-connected Jewish federal agent who’s publicly and privately extorting Candace Owens, the person he holds highest? Ian defends Candace at every single opportunity, to the point of humiliating himself.
When a fed with proclaimed Mossad connections then attacks Candace’s kids, husband, and brags about blackmailing her, anti-fedslop Ian Carroll is silent! Surely Ian is just running late on this, much like his delivery of my calzone.
What is Ian’s motivation behind lying about the evidence and dismissing it? If Ian genuinely engaged with my thread, he could have seen this coming. Instead, he’s defending an illegal immigrant who attacked Candace for years.
Emperor Nero Has No Clothes: Milo Yiannopoulos—Candace Owens’ Ghostwriter - Chapter 5
There is a myriad of evidence to show Milo Yiannopoulos’ fingerprints all over Candace’s brand. This ranges from admissions by Milo’s former clients to the nature of Candace and Milo’s relationship to a symbiotic collection of shared verbatim talking points.
Mrs. “anti-fedslop” Candace Owens is delegating her responsibility to a federal asset to give her talking points and evidence. Candace made Milo her top attack dog.
Before getting into all the examples, comprehend that Milo truly hates Candace Owens with a passion. This is the type of hate that you don’t get over unless there’s a financial incentive. Milo’s hatred of Candace is not speculation, but from his own words: “I DESPISE HER AS A PERSON.”
Milo made and deleted around 30 different posts in two days bashing Candace and, over his career, around 50. Milo’s hate for Candace never changed; it just shifted from a personal vendetta into a financial arrangement.
Milo was rightfully deported for being an illegal immigrant criminal who overstayed his visa by anywhere from five to seven years, making numerous threats against American citizens. Who happened to be among the first to reach out and show support privately?
Candace Owens, a newly found fan of illegal immigration. Rather newsworthy that Candace, who spent her career attacking illegal immigrants, would immediately support one.
It’s a clear-cut case of illegal immigration, marital fraud, and abuse. However, Candace still hasn't addressed this and supposedly supports it privately.
Focusing on Azealia Banks for a second, she knew about the Candace lesbian rumors from her time hiring Milo, but additionally, she claimed Milo was Candace Owens’ ghostwriter. Milo regularly touts ghostwriting “more than 15 New York Times bestsellers,” largely “political autobiographies.”
Normally, it’s worth questioning such a claim from Azealia Banks with more scrutiny. Still, Azealia worked closely with Milo when she hired Milo’s Tarantula PR firm and likely saw Milo as a gay friend of sorts.
Azealia knew Candace was a lesbian for a fact in October 2024. How could Azealia Banks, of all people, have this particular insight before practically anyone else? Obviously, in this specific case, she seems to have known more.
This theory becomes far more plausible when you discover Candace Owens’ PR manager is Mitchell Jackson, a Zionist homosexual ex-Vice journalist who voted for Joe Biden and Ron DeSantis. Mitchell was formerly known as Mitchell Sunderland before he took his husband’s name. Mitchell Jackson has an impressive resume, including Brett Cooper, Adam22, Clavicular, and Adam Friedland.
What’s significant about Mitchell Jackson and Milo’s relationship is that Mitchell was expelled from the journalist class, resulting from his begging Milo to “mock this fat feminist,” referring to a New York Times journalist in 2016. Mitchell was the managing editor of the women’s section of Vice before his ouster. Candace Owens’ public relations manager has been a member of the Milo fan club for more than a decade.
Mitchell, the PR manager of Candace Owens, openly talks about how he wants to help Israel rebrand Zionism, in the middle of what Candace refers to as a genocide, no less. Candace Owens fans reliably told me that working for Israel was the ultimate sin, yet her employees openly “dream” of such an opportunity.
All of Candace’s actions in the past few months have reeked of Milo pulling the strings, ranging from hosting Milo twice in the span of a month in August-September 2025 to the ambush interview with Nick Fuentes in July 2025 that preceded those appearances. Given Candace Owens’ actions, it lends credence to the idea that Milo Yiannopoulos used blackmail to manipulate Candace to his own ends.
Remarkably, the official “Candace” golden-check Twitter account posted a Milo clip a year after the stream as one of its first. Candace will randomly tag Milo looking for his opinion. Milo promotes Candace’s gaudy merchandise for obese wine moms.
A prime example would be Candace Owens’ attacks on Laura Loomer. Regardless of one's thoughts on Laura Loomer, love or hate her, the idea that she’s not Jewish is ridiculous. It’s an absurdly Milo-coded attack that he originated.
This idea is a joke; unless you’re a “Black Israelite,” it has no value. Go back to 2014, and you can find that Laura Loomer was openly identifying as ethnically Jewish, just not religious.
In any case, I compared Milo and Candace Owens’ attacks against Laura Loomer. Bar for bar, they’re the same, aside from a few minor details.
Candace is practically reading off a script Milo gave her, and flubbing lines like saying “2019” instead of “2017.” Candace cites Milo directly multiple times in this one episode.
Perhaps more notably, Candace Owens doxes Laura Loomer’s mom, a private citizen, to her millions of followers. I checked around, and I couldn’t find a single mention of Laura Loomer’s mother on any website outside data brokers.
Candace was getting odd small details off, but somehow had access to the private information of Laura Loomer’s obscure mother? Clearly Milo handed this over based on Candace’s “I need to know their families' names” principle.
Milo is known for ghostwriting Marjorie Taylor Greene’s unreleased book “The Case for Christian Nationalism.” Milo bragged about ghostwriting her tweets and served as her top advisor for years, with full access to MTG’s campaign credit card (which he used to buy the Ye24 domain). Milo brags all the time about how he “ghostwrites” for political figures.
Milo’s favorite clientele is Black people and women, as his resume shows: Ye, MTG, Azealia Banks, Sarah Palin, Bianca Censori, Ariel Pink, the estate of XXXTentacion, and many others.
The notion that a token like Milo getting to work with and ghostwrite for someone like Candace Owens, an African-American woman, fits in perfectly. Let alone that Milo himself admits he has power over Candace via blackmail.
Another question is why Candace Owens and, later on, Milo downplayed their relationship. They’re both lying to varying degrees, with Milo being most honest before he joined her side. Candace’s story directly contradicts Milo’s, and their current narrative, based on Candace’s original lie, makes little sense.
Ignore that Candace Owens’ claim to “never have had any contact with Milo” is itself contradictory to her talking about meeting him twice; Milo has admitted that this is outright false. To begin, in 2023 Milo discussed how Candace Owens couldn’t forgive him for calling George Farmer gay. How would Milo know what Candace was thinking without any contact?
In any case, in 2024 Milo revealed that before that, he did, in fact, meet with Candace Owens privately at a meeting with “rich Jews” in Palm Beach, Florida. There are details we can derive from Milo’s comments.
First, the fact that it was in Palm Beach matters. Milo hasn’t lived anywhere near Florida since at least Ye24 in 2022, before Candace’s comments. That implies it likely occurred before. Turning Point USA hosts events there yearly, which Candace attends.
Secondly, it isn’t the David Horowitz Freedom Center Candace refers to, because that’s in Sherman Oaks, California.
Thirdly, Milo’s language is key: “I roasted her in front of all the richest Jews in Palm Beach.” If Candace weren’t present, Milo wouldn’t have said “I roasted her in front of”; he would say “I roasted her to all the richest Jews in Palm Beach.” This specific wording implies they met before.
Who are these “rich Jews” Milo and Candace are meeting with, then covering up that meeting later? Mendacious Milo changing his story suggests there’s more to it, and Candace lying to begin with is extraordinarily off. Why is Candace attending a meeting with rich Jews, the same kind of meetings she attacked countless others for attending alongside Charlie Kirk?
The fact that Milo and Candace conspired in 2025 to correct the record on their appearance together is peculiar. Neither acknowledged this alleged meeting with “rich Jews.” Candace and Milo contradict what Milo said on Timcast that they did, in fact, know each other to some extent.
It’s quite strange that this is framed as solely a dispute over Ye, or Kanye West. Candace and Milo did fight over Ye, with Candace leaking direct messages in which Milo attacked Ye behind the scenes. However, Milo had been taking shots at Candace since at least mid-2021 in now-deleted Telegram posts.
This fight had been going on for much longer than the coordinated narrative Candace and Milo pushed. It culminated when Candace released her Ye interview immediately after Milo (to his credit) tried to bring Ye’s nitrous addiction to light.
So why is Candace Owens taking marching orders from a self-proclaimed Jewish federal agent? Candace’s fans will spam “enjoy the 7k!” and “fed” to all who doubt her.
Yet Candace not only hosts such individuals who admit on her own show that they’re in contact with the Mossad and separately confess they’re paid to attack Israel critics, but Candace actively works with such traitors. You can see this especially in Candace Owens's encounter with Nick Fuentes and every encounter since, where she verbatim repeats whatever Milo texts her to say.
In her recent attacks against her rival Nick Fuentes, Candace repurposes the same verbatim talking point of “they don’t even read books!” that Milo once weaponized against her. A cursory read of Milo’s Twitter shows this exact line is a tirade he frequently uses against Nick Fuentes.
This is also the specific attack Milo repeatedly told storied internet talk show host Ethan Ralph to use against Nick when Ethan Ralph turned on Nick Fuentes. It’s a Milo calling card; when weaponized by someone like illiterate Candace, it is unintentionally hysterical.
Another example is Candace Owens’ attacks against Turning Point USA’s Tyler Bowyer, hypocritically accusing him of being a swinger to 5 million people. This is just Milo’s exact attack against Tyler Bowyer, clearly fed to Candace. To prove without a shadow of a doubt, Milo tried this talking point(with no evidence) a week before Candace would magically stumble upon it.
Sometimes, Candace will reply directly to Milo only to reiterate exactly what he’s saying without adding a single solitary thing, as if she forgot they weren’t texting. As they say, “It’s always two dumb bitches telling each other ‘exactlyyyyy.’” This has happened multiple times, on numerous different occasions.
Some of Candace’s responses to Milo read like a conversation with an early version of “Chat GBT.” It’s akin to the “Totem Pole Trench” trope, where 2-3 kids in a trench coat attempt to get into an adult section. Instead, it’s a homosexual Jewish man from England wearing blackface and drag trying to get into the Klan rally.
When confronted about this apparent connection to Milo, Candace refuses to answer, demanding, “Ask me about Milo in person,” and mocking the idea that he's a fixer. Milo runs a public relations firm that helps celebrities and politicians, which fits the exact definition of a “fixer.”
If Candace had no connection to Milo Yiannopoulos, she could say “I have nothing to do with him.” Instead, she repeats him bar-for-bar; they openly work together, and Candace cites him as a source on her enemies. Candace obviously cannot say this, as the game has been given away.
Milo pushed the lie that some influencer campaign labeled Candace Owens a demon for critiquing Erika Kirk and threatened to expose anyone who didn’t fess up. Naturally, nothing came of this because no such campaign existed. People organically find constantly targeting a widow wrong.
This theory originated from Matt Wallace engagement farming, where he lied about being paid to attack Candace (something he still hasn't provided receipts for). Then someone made an AI mockup email, then it was stolen and boosted by STD petri dish Morgan Ariel as a real thing.
It’s amusing that the crowd that talks about fake evidence, “fedslop,” and OPs boosted a fabricated piece of evidence. The creator made that clear from the start, and later said it was fake and shouldn’t be spread. Nobody involved in this ever recorded the record.
Notably, the framework of Milo’s post aligns exactly with Candace Owens’ replies. Milo says, “Did you take money to call Candace Owens a ‘demon’ on X? If so, we want to hear from you.” Then Candace goes, “Oh, I am soooooo here for the list.”
Who exactly is “we”? What’s with the sudden group affiliation that Candace Owens backs up in the replies? Why is Milo suddenly speaking for Candace if they have no involvement? The natural response would be “what do you mean, we?” from Candace if it were untrue.
Milo also follows up Candace Owens’ attacks against Erika Kirk, TPUSA, Jessica Reed Kraus, and many others. Milo’s main traction is from either defending Candace Owens or attacking her enemies.
For comparison’s sake, you can contrast Milo and Dave Smith. Candace constantly brings up Dave Smith and always praises him. However, despite being the individual Candace celebrates and cites most, Dave Smith had two months between appearances on her show, one of which was a debate.
By contrast, Milo is the sole person to get back-to-back interviews within a month on Candace Owens’ show. This Milo appearance followed Candace’s hit job interview with Nick Fuentes, which aimed to take him out of the game.
Notably, Tucker Carlson used the same mechanism when he hosted Candace to bash Nick Fuentes and then his close friend Milo a few months later, directly following Fuentes. Both Tucker and Candace oddly had illegal immigrant Milo on the guest episode, subsequently after Nick Fuentes.
When Candace started her attack on Erika Kirk, accusing her of being a gay pedophile, Milo immediately chimed in as her main attack dog. Milo was saying that Charlie Kirk married a lesbian, kind of like George Farmer and Candace Owens, except totally baseless and using flimsy circumstantial evidence. Milo has notably been on record saying lesbians “deserve death or worse.”
These influencers have a makeshift network. Tucker Carlson founded “Tucker Carlson Books” as a partner/subsidiary of “Skyhorse Publishing” (the publisher of Steve Bannon’s books and Rabbi Schmuley’s kosher sex books). The first books published under this are a Russell Brand book seemingly ghostwritten by Milo and an “ex-gay” book by Milo himself. Russell Brand is best friends with Candace and her husband.
In 2023, Milo privately bragged to Ethan Ralph that he talks to Tucker Carlson regularly to give him intel on Nick Fuentes. Given Candace’s talking points against Nick, it’s reasonable to extrapolate that Candace and Milo share a similar partnership. Funnily enough, Ethan Ralph made Candace Owens (regrettably).
With the most charitable interpretation—that I am wholly mistaken, a conspiratorial hater misreading Milo’s open blackmail attempts—why doesn’t Milo disavow Candace?
Milo claimed he would expose all the gays and specifically called for lesbians to get something worse than death. At a minimum, Milo’s moral framework would allow him to wash his hands of this situation with ease. However, it’s quite doubtful Milo jumps off his new gravy train, despite her homosexual adultery.
George Farmer: The Gay Allegations And New Proof - Chapter 6
George Farmer has multiple allegations and a macabre hidden past. The entire scenario with him meeting Candace is reminiscent of a lavender marriage. I will focus on this more later in a separate article, but I’ll address it briefly.
Candace and George originally met at a Turning Point UK event hosted by John Mappin. John Mappin is a Candace Owens family friend and Milo ally who appears in Jeffrey Epstein’s black book and was in the Epstein files via an anonymous report to the FBI.
That itself is dubious; it wouldn’t be hard proof in my books. That being said, Candace Owens would use this same standard to accuse others.
John Mappin has also reportedly hosted the Emir of Qatar at his hotel, as well as the president of Kazakhstan. John Mappin’s “Camelot Castle” seems to be a mecca for foreign government activity. Mappin denies any relation to Jeffrey Epstein.
In any case, there are at least two different people who have accused George Farmer of being a gay molester. Raheem Kassam, former adviser to Nigel Farage and editor-in-chief at the National Pulse, detailed being “sexually assaulted” by George Farmer. At the same time, Candace Owens was supposedly five feet away watching while guzzling cocktails like it was Hennessy.
Raheem recounted George Farmer repeatedly trying to make out with him and “grabbing his crotch,” invoking blood memories of the British Raj conquering the Mughal Empire.
This implies Candace Owens is well aware of her husband’s alleged homosexuality. Hypothetically, they have an open relationship dynamic where they can both have sex with whomever they want. That would still be despite George Farmer’s proclaimed Catholic faith and Candace’s claim to being a “tradwife.” That is still wrong, given the dishonesty in their public image and morals.
It’s rather unlikely Raheem would lie about this for years for “clout.” It’s an emasculating story to recount, and few care about George Farmer outside his relationship with Candace. “I got gay groped by this random English man” is a pretty odd narrative for a masculine conservative man connected to DC to keep up for years.
Recently, Raheem Kassam supported his claims by posting text messages from the night of the alleged event just after midnight on September 21st, 2019. The Mirror is a prominent speakeasy-style DC bar a few blocks from the White House and about 15 minutes from Capitol Hill.
According to these text messages, Raheem Kassam alleges that “George Farmer grabbed my cock and tried to grind on me.”
The date of September 20th/early September 21st, 2019 is very particular. Candace Owens was invited to testify before the House Oversight Committee on White Nationalism on September 20th, 2019. That bolsters Raheem’s claims, as Candace and George were in DC, near The Mirror bar.
One other piece of circumstantial evidence concerns the Farmer-Kassam affair. After exhaustive digging, I exclusively found that on April 19th, 2019, George Farmer hit on Raheem Kassam completely out of the blue.
George Farmer wasn’t tagged, and the thread had nothing to do with him, yet he unprompted commented on Raheem’s physical appearance. On its own, that wouldn’t mean much, but considering Raheem later accused George Farmer of homosexually molesting him, this gives further credence to that allegation.
Furthermore, there is an additional allegation of homosexual impropriety against George Farmer. This ironically stems from Milo Yiannopoulos, who asserts that another man told him about George Farmer sexually engaging with them behind Candace’s back.
Importantly, Milo repeatedly denied the Raheem Kassam-George Farmer allegation for years. Therefore, by deduction, if Milo doesn’t believe Raheem’s homosexual groping allegations against George Farmer, it was a second man asserting them when Milo claims this. Milo is saying Raheem’s allegation is a lie, but there’s another George Farmer groping victim.
Again, the impulse to dismiss Milo’s constant rumormongering is understandable. It’s utterly delusional not to question Milo.
What makes this far more compelling is that Milo tried to retract the dozens of allegations he made against George Farmer across multiple years, but only once he got in with Candace. Milo often brags that he never gets stories wrong or retracts info.
For many years, Milo vociferously claimed that George Farmer is gay, in dozens of tweets, in multiple Telegram posts from 2021-2022, including calling him a “nancy boy.” Personally, if I joked about someone being gay, I wouldn’t do so across four years, dozens of times, as if it were a statement of fact. Nor would I delete the tweets if it were merely a joke.
Milo attacked George Farmer as a homosexual countless times and detailed specific knowledge of George Farmer’s sexuality. Milo referred to Candace Owens’ husband as “vers,” which is defined as “a person who is willing to take either a penetrative or a receptive role in a particular sexual act, especially anal intercourse.”
Infamously, Milo stated, “Let me tell you something Candace Owens husband is getting PLUNGED.” Apparently, “plunged” means taking it anally in LGBTQ lingo.
Milo called George Farmer a weak man with no influence over Candace Owens. He went further, stating, “he’s living a lie,” while blaming his homosexuality on Candace’s lack of authenticity.
It’s worth pondering: who told Milo stories about George Farmer being a closeted homosexual, and why did that story change only after Milo met with George? Milo was very confident in that accusation until he teamed up with Candace.
Milo claimed the reason he doesn’t believe George Farmer is gay is that he met him and he’s British. Milo excused a dozen allegations across five years as George Farmer being “Not gay. Just British.” That Milo thinks so low of his audience that they would buy this speaks volumes about how much he hates them.
By that metric, should any other men Milo met in real life have any allegations he levied against them summarily dismissed? Obviously that’s a terrible excuse.
Why is Milo denying a victim of gay molestation the ability to speak up? What is the logic behind Milo being able to use his past as a molestation victim as a “get out of jail free” card for his comments avowing pedophilia?
Yet, Milo weaponizes such allegations against George Farmer. Then Milo callously casts them aside, attempting to discredit them when it’s convenient?
If any victim who has had encounters with George Farmer wants to direct message me with hard evidence, I can present it either anonymously or otherwise. I will not censor or discredit your allegations, as Milo has.
George Farmer himself has given speeches as late as 2024 on how homosexuality is the death of Western Civilization and how it’s ruining marriage. To his credit, at a minimum, Candace’s sapphic tendencies do seem to have ruined his.
In all fairness, these are merely allegations against George Farmer, albeit made by 2 prominent conservative media figures with little reason to lie. Particularly, Raheem directly recounted his experience, providing texts that match when Candace and George were in Washington, DC. Milo walking back dozens of accusations as a joke, while originally insisting it was someone other than Raheem, is incredibly fishy.
That is different from Candace Owens, whose cheating and lesbian dating profiles are 100% confirmed via digital forensics. Together, these two aspects seem to point to a larger, lavender-coated portrait of Candace and George’s marriage.
If you wish to support groundbreaking research, subscribe here on Substack or donate on BuyMeACoffee or SupertipGG.
BTC: bc1qpt4n05x2xvv4vxjzdhepuukrs9effdjhhcug4c
ETH: 0xc4B7e14906aCB453443e0B757b9776e91d061F8A
The Secret Zionist Who Owns Candace Owens and Runs Her Entire Company - Chapter 7
To unravel the Zionist funder who secretly owns Candace ’Owens’ website, customer info, and business, we must examine the specifics of Emmanuel Macron’s lawsuit. In the Delaware docket filing, “GeorgeTom LLC” is listed as a defendant, with “GeorgeTom” short for “George Thomas Farmer.”
As Fortune magazine revealed, GeorgeTom LLC operates Candace Owens’ website and podcast distribution. That means George Farmer, not Candace, operates the business side and owns CandaceOwens.com, while Candace operates the social media side and associated ad revenue. Furthermore, a 2023 filing by Candace Owens associates the “GeorgeTom” branding with her merchandise.
As a result, Candace Owens is only the face of the brand, with no actual control. In reality, George Farmer owns and operates all user data, the business, and the online infrastructure.
That makes sense, given that George Farmer is worth upwards of 200 million dollars and, as far as is publicly known, is Candace's main source of funding as her spouse. Nevertheless, there’s a reason why Candace doesn’t disclose the fact that George Farmer is the real owner of the Candace Owens business.
A funny thing to note is that Candace bases many of her conspiracies around Delaware. The real Delaware conspiracy is that Candace Owens and her husband registered their LLCs there.
Why would Candace and George Farmer register their LLC in Delaware? Of all states, it requires the least information to file, including hiding board members, allowing anonymous LLCs, and being among the hardest states to collect legal judgments from. Why are Candace and George so afraid of disclosing the members/managers of their LLC?
Candace has alluded to the fact that it’s not truly her own brand. Ominously, Candace Owens, on Shawn Ryan, when asked how she feels about being independent, says, “I could never go back to working for someone…other than my husband.”
This was further confirmed by the guest host of Candace Owens’ show, Ian Carroll. Ian admitted that “George [Farmer] handles the whole business.”
To clarify, Candace Owens’ husband holds all the cards: customer data, the purse, and her entire infrastructure and digital architecture. George Farmer pays the bills, collects the money, and owns the companies associated with Candace’s brand.
Perhaps more mystifying is that Candace Owens claims she has no clue what her husband does day to day, even though his main job is running her business. George Farmer could be selling all her fans’ data collected via their website, but Candace wouldn’t know.
Personally, it’s rather unclear why a wife wouldn’t know what their husband is doing on some level, particularly if they share a business. That seems very estranged. That’s a giant liability at a minimum, and more along the lines of a horrendous business practice.
This is key for establishing why the next section matters so much. Candace’s husband, George Farmer, owns the business, which changes everything.
What Candace Owens Doesn’t Want You to Know: Her Zionist Funder —George Farmer - Chapter 8
Often, you see Candace Owens face accusations of being paid by everyone from the Mercer family to Peter Thiel to Qatar to Russia and so on. Although this analysis can be valuable, it misses the point. There’s no need to reenact Blue’s Clues; the answer lies right before everyone’s eyes.
The hidden truth is that George Farmer, the operator of Candace Owens’ website with access to all her customers’ info, is a dyed-in-the-wool Zionist who’s never retracted his beliefs. George is an “antisemitic hate speech” laws proponent, fluent speaker of Hebrew, and a Palestinian hater.
Regardless of your opinions on Israel or Palestine, this is completely at odds with Candace Owens’ current beliefs. Candace has also refused to disclose any of this.
The difference between Candace and George was that she was getting paid to shill for Israel on PragerU, TPUSA, or the Daily Wire. On the other hand, George did it because it’s his genuine, deeply held moral rectitude.
What Candace doesn’t want people to find out is that her husband, George Farmer, had a now-deleted Twitter account under the username “GTSFarmer.” He deleted all its posts before re-registering it months later, in February 2020, under the same username to obscure his public image. I painstakingly reviewed over 1600 tweets and manually archived about 300 to ensure the record cannot be erased, as Candace Owens wishes.
In case Candace fans have any doubts, you can check her account for “GTSFarmer.” Candace has numerous tweets referencing or replying to this account.
If you break down George Farmer’s tweets, they fit broadly into about four categories: attacking “antisemitism” or praising Jews, pro-Israel, pro-Russia, and anti-EU/NATO. Of what I archived, at least 25 were directly about “antisemitism” or remarkably pro Jew. What constitutes “antisemitism” in this case ranges from someone like Jeremy Corbyn to topics like any opposition to Israel.
Tweets solely dedicated to defending or praising Israel alone count around 13. Overtly pro-Russia tweets number about 10. The number of anti-EU, pro-Brexit tweets is somewhere around 100. Statistically, about 13% of George Farmer’s posts saved in the Wayback Machine would be ardently pro Jew or expressly pro-Zionist.
George Farmer is a massive fan of jews and an ardent lifelong Israel advocate, who then went out of his way to conceal his pro-Israeli politics soon after his marriage to Candace Owens went public. Later, George went totally silent on the issue despite still being strongly pro-Israel.
As of January 15th 2019, Candace Owens’ husband had an Israeli flag in his bio stating he was “Pro Free World,” including Israel. He later added on January 22nd that he “love[s] Israel” in his bio. On February 6th, 2019, when he announced his engagement to Candace Owens, George Farmer mysteriously removed any reference to his love of Israel from his bio by February 7th.
More queer is George Farmer’s relationship with Israel. I cannot speak to the specifics, but it’s remarkably off. That’s bearing in mind George Farmer’s marriage to Candace Owens. This isn't normal, and if it were anyone else, Candace would do a 12-episode mini-series on how absolutely bonkers this is.
On 19 Feb 2019, George Farmer tweeted, “I once was described as ‘the greatest friend of Israel of your generation’ by a British / Israeli politician.” To beggar belief beyond comprehension, in the same tweet, George Farmer proudly stated, “Would love to know how others have helped Israel in the way I have?” What did he mean by this?
Using the most good-faith interpretation possible, I’m presuming George Farmer means a British member of Parliament who holds dual citizenship with Israel. However, George could also mean an Israeli government official with British citizenship. George Farmer needs to clarify. Personally, looking through a list of British MPs, I couldn’t find one conservative in the last 15 years with Israeli citizenship.
What exactly does the husband of Candace Owens, the biggest known critic of Israel, mean by how he has “helped Israel,” a foreign state? How has he “helped” in a way that outdoes anyone else, as he claims? If it were activism or advocacy alone, Britain is among the most Zionist countries, so that already exists in spades.
Why would a British citizen brag about helping Israel, after invoking Israeli politicians? If any of Candace’s enemies said this, she would accuse them of working for Israel and being a Mossad spy. I’m not going to do that, but obviously George Farmer would need to explain in depth what he meant.
On September 26, 2019, George Farmer attended the “Jewish 100 Gala” hosted by Chabad Lubavitch Hasidic Jews who own the largest weekly Yiddish newspaper, the Algemeiner Journal. The Algemeiner Journal was founded at the behest of the Rebbe, Menachem Mendel Schneerson.
This is not a gala you get invited to solely because you’re rich or famous; you need to have quite extensive connections to the Chabad Jewish community to get invited. For insight, the opening speech was about the “beast of antisemitism.” Chabad comprises only 95k people globally, so you need to be well connected as a British copper trader to be invited.
Prior guests to the J100 gala include Donald Trump in 2015 before his campaign announcement, convicted rapist and Candace Owens ally Harvey Weinstein in 2013, both Bari Weiss & Douglass Murray in 2025, and now Javier Milei at their 2026 gala.
The Algemeiner has been accused of being effectively an Israeli NGO by multiple media watchdogs and reports, with connections to B’nai B’rith. The advisory board features former national director of the Anti-Defamation League, Abraham Foxman. To this day, the ADL directly publishes pieces in the Algemeiner.
Candace Owens loves to incorrectly throw around the term “Frankists” to describe religiously fanatic Jews. Perversely, these dinners hosted by Meshichists and attended by George Farmer are the closest contemporary equivalent to “Frankism.” Although the two are disparate, Frankism doesn’t exist today (at all).
Regardless, the way Candace Owens uses “Frankism” would be most equivalent to hard-line Chabad Meshichists who believe in a Jewish messiah, such as the publisher and chair of the Algemeiner, Simon Jacobson. Rabbi Simon was a “choizer” for the Rebbe; he memorized and transcribed him.
Allegedly, someone from Chabad targeted Candace Owens and George Farmer for assassination. What’s weirder is that, despite this, Candace never talks about Chabad.
She’s mentioned it four times ever—three in 2026, along with mentioning the Rebbe only in reference to RFK Jr. and Rabbi Shmuley. The one time Candace ever really talked about Chabad was on Piers Morgan’s show in her debate against Shmuley.
Personally, if a group of people attempted to liquidate me, I would never stop talking about them. The fact that Candace wants to talk about extinct branches of Judaism, but not the one she and her husband were close with and then supposedly tried to kill them, is certainly a choice.
George Farmer is also incredibly close with pro-Israel activist and IDF spokesman Douglass Murray, who spent six months with the Israel Defense Forces in Gaza. To Candace’s credit, she has on two occasions acknowledged that she has had dinner with Douglas Murray and openly says she quite likes him.
Granted, that was when he was the talk of the town following his Rogan debate with Candace’s ally Dave Smith. She also neglected to mention that she has hosted Murray on her Prager U show to promote his book.
Where the wheels begin to fall off is how Candace explains this coincidence: “my husband and him[Murray] are from the same highfalutin circles.” What circles does she mean? The two men are a decade apart in age.
This is an obfuscation; it contradicts how George Farmer himself characterized his relationship with Douglass Murray. Farmer defined him as a “friend” and recommended his 2019 book “Madness Crows.” Why wouldn’t Candace admit he’s a family friend? Why has Candace refused to criticize one of the biggest supporters of Israel?
Candace Owens has campaigned against anyone who questions the “Epstein Files” or any of the commonly held narratives about Jeffrey Epstein. Queerly, this spunky energy was missing when George and Candace’s personal friend Douglas Murray advocated for Donald Trump not to release the Epstein files in July 2025 because “the voters don’t care.” Polling shows that anywhere from 77-90% of Americans want the Epstein Files released.
The same laws George Farmer championed would get his philandering wife Candace Owens arrested for hate speech, labeled a “jew hater,” and demonized as an antisemitic Holocaust denier. Candace did win “Antisemite of the Year” in 2024, a thing which George believed and likely still believes should land you in jail.
George Farmer was boosting articles by Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer and friend, Alan Dershowitz, attacking Palestine. Candace Owens claims to be one of Palestine's biggest supporters; her proclaimed politics center around it. The person who owns Candace’s business isn’t just pro-Israel, but outwardly blamed Palestinians for all their own problems and said Israel had no part in any of it.
George Farmer cried out “toxic antisemitism” when Israel illegally struck Syria in 2019, and the Iranian officers there merely responded verbally. When Israel was actively attacking foreign nations, it was fine. When those foreign nations expressed their frustration, it was “wanting to wipe out one of our closest friends and allies, Israel.”
If anyone else said this, Candace would call them a “Zionist warmonger.” Candace was engaged to George Farmer at this point.
One of George Farmer’s most common declarations was labeling Jeremy Corbyn an “antisemite,” as he did dozens of times. These comments contemporaneously occurred in the months following Israel being exposed for creating and utilizing the “Act.IL” app to propagate that exact anti-Corbyn narrative via astroturfing. Although George Farmer had moved on from the conservative party to the now-failed Brexit Party, he was hyper-focused on Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn for being a “jew hater.”
It’s imperative to note that George Farmer has never critiqued Israel once in his entire life or renounced his earlier public statements. Candace had George on her show on December 12th, 2024; guess which topics didn't come up? Jews or Israel. None of their shared podcast appearances pre- or post-October 7th get into this.
Oddly, that’s the only Candace Owens show episode in over a year to make no serious reference to Jews, Israel, or allude to a conspiracy involving either in any capacity. As far as anyone can tell, George Farmer is still a Zionist, still a fanboy of jews, and hasn’t changed his beliefs, even a small bit.
That’s not to mention that George Farmer fluently speaks classical Hebrew because he loves Jews so much. A thorough search of Candace Owens’ YouTube shows she has never once mentioned her husband’s proficiency in the language of Israel!
If you’re anti-Israel, could that not be an incredible tool to utilize? If any other major media figure concealed their spouse’s knowledge of Hebrew, Candace would have her tinfoil hat on immediately, spinning conspiracies.
The only time George mentioned this outside of this tweet was on a now-deleted episode of the Candace Owens show on PragerU. Candace has never brought this up herself.
For reference, modern Hebrew and classical Hebrew are like modern English vs. Shakespearean English, but even closer. Learning Hebrew isn’t a requirement to become a priest or a pastor. A doctorate in Biblical studies may require proficiency in Classical Hebrew, but it’s very uncommon in an undergraduate bachelor’s degree, as George Farmer has.
Don’t take my word for it! In 2019, Candace Owens herself described George Farmer as “one of the biggest supporters of Israel in the UK.” Candace is aware of George Farmer’s politics. Candace’s husband has refused to denounce those views, and she gives him power over her business. Anti-Israel advocate Candace, on her own, admitted that George Farmer is one of the biggest Zionists in the UK, a country renowned for being among the biggest supporters of Israel.
George Farmer has been quiet on this issue in recent years, except in mid-2022. On the “Pints with Aquanis” podcast, George Farmer equated any criticism of Jews to “bot” behavior. Seemingly, George Farmer was bragging about personally banning thousands of people on Parler for criticizing Israel and Jews, which was very common during this period.
So the last mention we have from George Farmer on these topics is that he was banning people on Parler for criticizing Jews and that questioning the Holocaust is the quintessential dark idea that needs to be debunked. Nowadays, Candace endorses questioning the Holocaust, the same behavior her husband was banning people on Parler for.
Putting the pieces together, Candace Owens is giving the full name, email, credit card information, and home address of many of her supporters to a lifelong Zionist who has an obsessive love of jews and knows Israeli politicians.
That’s a conflict of interest, even more so when you consider the conspiratorial aspect of Candace’s work. Would Candace accept Tucker Carlson, Nick Fuentes, or Ian Carroll having their businesses run by a hardcore Zionist who’s fluent in Hebrew and celebrates hate speech laws? Of course not.
Data collection from payment services is one of the main purposes behind a honeypot-fed OP. Using her own logic, Candace Owens would be a “super fed” working for the globalist Frankists connected to British Royalty.
Candace Owens bases her entire brand on being anti-Israel, anti-Jew, and conspiracy theories. Is it such an unreasonable theory that Candace Owens is controlled opposition specifically designed to discredit anti-Zionism and the right at large? Meanwhile, she collects the information of millions of those people.
Finding examples of ardent Zionists celebrating Candace Owens as their opposition isn’t uncommon. Some laud Candace for picking up their deceptive talking points meant to distract from valid criticism.
What other explanation is there for Candace Owens? She demands your home address, full name, and private details with no option for privacy, only to hand it to a Hebrew-speaking unreformed Zionist.
Candace or a third party could easily run her site. Instead, she outsources it to a proud philosemitic supporter of Israel who worked in the metal trading industry. What reason is there for a copper salesman to run Candace’s site? Before you point out Parler, George Farmer ran the company into the ground and was forced to sell everything.
Besides, if Candace Owens is a “trad wife,” why is she deliberately going against everything her husband believes? A “trad wife” doesn’t need to believe everything their husband believes, but if it’s a “traditional marriage,” you’re not supposed to base your entire life on opposing your husband’s convictions.
On its own, it’d be totally bizarre that the most prominent “antisemite” online influencer in the world, who has won awards for her Jew hatred, has a Hebrew-speaking, pro-Israel husband whose beliefs she hides.
Let’s say this article causes Candace Owens and George Farmer to divorce. George would retain all the customer data, emails, and information on her audience.
Are Candace Owens’ fans really comfortable with giving their private data over to someone who calls for criticism of Israel to be illegal?
At minimum, that’s risky, but it comes across as more of a honeypot. That’s not to mention that Mossad connected Milo, who brags about having blackmail on her, to her own strange connections.
If George just had his own pro-Israel opinions, it’d be mudslinging. However, the fact that George Farmer owns Candace’s business, and she’s the most prominent critic of Israel, is deeply concerning.
Candace will let you know: don’t trust those closeted homosexual neocons who hate free speech!
Oracle Of Chabad - Chapter 9
An innumerable amount has been said about Candace Owens’ career working for various Jewish people and Zionists. I'll cover that in a different article, but this essay aims to offer fresh information, so I will focus on a few key things people haven’t talked about.
One retort Candace Fans might say is, “You only have George Farmer being a Zionist up until 2022; that doesn’t mean much!” That’s obviously not a valid criticism when George Farmer has yet to recant his pro-Israel and censorship views despite many chances. Still, it’s pretty easy to address that at face value.
Candace Owens, by her own admission, took a large sum of money likely from what she said was “an agent of Israel” in 2025. Candace had a multi-million-dollar contract with Larry Ellison’s Oracle, where she repeatedly promoted his service, before later attacking Ellison and Oracle.
Here’s a compilation. For reference, Candace started pushing IDF mega-donor Larry Ellison’s Oracle from February to March 2025. She then started to bash it around August, less than six months later. There was never any reconciling with the fact that she shilled a CIA contractor connected to Israel to her anti-Zionist, anti-”fedslop” audience.
Although Candace blamed Oracle for censorship and helping to genocide Palestinians, she took a deal from them. These deals are huge, and getting an ad on Candace’s platform isn't cheap—these Oracle cloud contracts run into the hundreds of thousands yearly at the low end.
Imagine if Nick Fuentes, Tucker Carlson, or Ian Carroll took a brand deal from CIA and IDF contractor Larry Ellison. Candace certainly went on the attack against Bari Weiss for taking money from Larry Ellison, but Candace is in no position to make that attack.
Compare episode 167 yourself. On an unedited Bitchute reupload, it’s 1 hour, 1 minute, and 19 seconds; on YouTube it’s only 58 minutes and 31 seconds. It’s 33:20 into the Bitchute version.
What’s more damning is that Candace Owens tried to hide this and never addressed it. The sole time people caught on, Candace altered the episode on YouTube and removed it entirely from Rumble, since you can’t retroactively alter uploads.
Candace also systematically removed all comments calling out the fact that she took Oracle money. Notably, Candace didn’t alter the other times she pushed Oracle, and her Oracle affiliate link is still in the description.
This begs the question: what else is Candace Owens selectively editing from her streams and videos? She’s unaccountable; Candace just “Vanishing Commissar’d” her IDF-CIA sponsor like she’s Joseph Stalin, only once she was called out and never took responsibility. Wiping a sponsorship after getting called out is shameless.
Another key question is: how could this have happened? Larry Ellison is an exceptionally well-known figure. Long before the Free Press buyout and TikTok, he consistently ranked among the top 10 richest people in the world, sitting in seventh place after a spending spree.
Larry Ellison has long been known as the single largest private donor to the IDF and as a close friend of Benjamin Netanyahu. Larry Ellison bought TikTok’s US operations to make it more pro-Israel. It’s like saying you didn’t know you were getting money from Elon Musk because it was just Tesla.
When Benjamin Netanyahu faced corruption charges, Larry Ellison lobbied to get him a top-tier lawyer from Israeli asset Arnon Milchan. When Benjamin Netanyahu was briefly out of office, Larry Ellison allegedly offered him a job at Oracle. Benjamin Netanyahu was spotted on Larry Ellison’s Hawaiian island at a fancy restaurant, wining and dining with the Oracle CEO.
Candace Owens often accuses others of taking Zionist money, Israel funding US media organizations, and Israel buying influencers. Taking it at face value that every time Candace makes those accusations, it’s true, Candace is the last person who can make that critique. She got fat stacks of cash from the world’s richest Zionist and the world’s wealthiest Jewish man, Larry Ellison.
Either Candace Owens and her staff do literally no research, or they thought they could get away with taking pro-Israel money while running an anti-Israel show. Candace Owens is the same person trying to lead the anti-Israel movement and going on about how she wants to know your mother’s mother’s cousin, yet missed the wealthiest Israel-connected billionaire in the world.
It’s very hard to assume this basic fact was something Candace Owens didn’t know, despite her inability to enunciate correctly. The fact that she scrubbed the episode, never addressed it, and pretended like she didn’t take millions from an Israel-connected CIA contractor is incredibly suspect.
Impetuous Ian shamelessly ran interference for Candace Owens on her taking Oracle money. To begin with, it's a massive red flag that Candace’s cumskin yokel is the one addressing this and not her. It speaks volumes that Candace won’t address the elephant in her room, but her rube will.
Ian Carroll’s excuses for Candace are, at best, brain-dead, and at worst, extremely subversive. Ian trotted out multiple lies, either that he made up on her behalf or that she told him. Again, it’s unclear why Ian would be the one addressing criticism of Candace for taking Oracle money.
Ian asserted that it was just “one instance.” There were three across two months, not one.
Ian also said, “She canceled the ad read after that.” That’s not how ad reads work, which Ian should know because he took a few on TikTok. Someone as big as Candace gets a flat fee upfront and gets a bonus per affiliate purchase. In this case, the cheapest Oracle contracts are about 150,000$ per year.
Take note of the language as well: “after that.” So Oracle paid Candace up until that point. Ian also wants to frame this as “oh, we caught a mistake”; no, Candace was getting called out, and you explained to her how bad this looked.
Regardless of any excuses, this is unacceptable. There’s no reason Candace shouldn’t know about Oracle in general, much less when taking a sponsor.
If a congressman got AIPAC money and then stopped, Ian certainly wouldn’t give them this slack. Ian's defense of this detestable behavior is brazen.
Keep in mind Candace Owens and her fans have popularized the term “fedslop” for anyone who disagrees with her analysis. Meanwhile, Candace is taking CIA money, being blackmailed with a sex tape by Milo, a federal asset, and is besties with CIA Tucker Carlson.
As I exclusively reported, in 2024 (and later in 2025), Candace Owens appeared three times on an ADL-affiliated podcast hosted by Nick Cannon. The podcast is called “Counsel Culture”; the term “counsel culture” itself was popularized by the ADL and Nick Cannon’s personal friend, Jonathan Greenblatt, in his book “It Could Happen Here.”
The podcast's express purpose is to keep Black people in line from questioning Israel and “buckbreaking” the Black community. Nick Cannon was the prototype of this when he exclaimed Black Israelite ideas and was forced to apologize. The podcast features more ethnocentric African Americans like Dr. Umar, Nuri Muhammed (one of Louis Farrakhan’s top students), and Prophet Lovy Elias.
During these three interviews, Candace mentions Israel zero times, jews twice, and only Nick Cannon mentions the ADL in reference to his friend. Going on a show where you get humiliated for being “hurtful” and providing zero pushback to Jonathan Greenblatt’s puppet is shameful. Why give this trash a platform if you’re opposed to Israel or the ADL, as Candace claims to be?
On one of these struggle sessions, Candace admits how the pressure over Ye almost broke her, and she was crying in the shower. Is this really the self-proclaimed strong, independent Black woman standing up to Benjamin Netanyahu, or a sellout planning an exit route for when her newest grift runs dry?
An earlier key moment is when Candace Owens went to Israel to kiss the Western Wall during her visit for the opening of the US embassy in Jerusalem. Charles Kirk downplays it as praying, but by Candace’s admission, that’s not entirely accurate.
What’s especially notable is the context. This happened around May 14th, 2018. Just two weeks later, on May 31st, 2018, Candace would say on Joe Rogan, “religion isn’t my thing.” Candace didn’t go for religious reasons; she went for political reasons. Sounds as if she wasn’t the “praying” type.
Nobody made Candace Owens kiss the Western Wall. She wasn’t religious at that point. Presumably, “pray” can often mean “kiss” if you’re not religious.
Candace went out of her way to kiss the wall because she saw it as a way to further her career; she didn't have an Evangelical or Christian-Zionist mindset. When you visit Israel, you aren’t forced at gunpoint to kiss the wall.
In 2019, Candace took her 2nd trip to the Chabad-Lubavitch Community Center in Aspen. There, Candace Owens attacked the left for opposing Israel and being “antisemitic.” She portrayed Dennis Prager as a “phenomenal human being” and “one of the greatest orators of our time.”
Candace now argues that she didn’t know about Israel—she was only an innocent 29 year old baby. Notwithstanding being a juvenile as a nearly 30 year old woman, Candace was at Jewish community centers ranting about antisemitism despite supposedly having no investment in the topic.
Candace Owens, by her own admission, concedes that Jews saved her career. Jews didn’t just make Candace; without Jews, Candace Owens would be a has-been, a fallen star, or a victim of cancel culture.
When Candace got canceled for praising Hitler (which she claims she didn’t), she literally got the call from someone she has described as Israeli intelligence.
Candace then met a rabbi at the Simon Wiesenthal Center. The rabbi spoke Hebrew to the CEO of PragerU, Marrisa Streit, and everything was fine, like they just conducted kabbalah. For some reason, Candace never mentioned that a Unit 8200 member with a rabbi saved her career until 2026.
K Is For Kandace, G Is For George, B Is For Baron - Chapter 10
It’d be remiss of me not to touch upon Candace Owens and George Farmer’s exceptionally pro-Russia and anti-European politics. Arguably most odd of all, Candace Owens and George Farmer’s first real conversation was about how much they love Vladimir Putin.
The Russia element seems overstated; it’s a bit of a red herring. A deeper look suggests it’s more than just a KGB revival. It’s a similar modus operandi to US intelligence-world-type influencers with CIA ties: John Kiriakou, Tucker Carlson, Shawn Ryan, and many of these “Chinahawks.” All these “former” intelligence-connected influencers happen to love Russia.
When not defending Russia or pushing Vladimir Putin directly, Candace’s bagman George Farmer is devoted to pushing hyperbolic Kremlin narratives against France, claiming it’s in “CIVIL WAR,” or “this is the end of France.”
The anti-EU sentiment is more straightforward, with Farmer being a candidate for the now-defunct Brexit Party. Less easy to grapple with are George Farmer’s specific anti-EU narratives: repeatedly asserting the EU is the “new USSR,” calling the EU socialist, saying it’s a “dictatorship run by ideological extremists,” and promoting the abolition of the European Union itself.
Farmer has facetiously called for Europe to be invaded by Russia, endlessly mocked the concept of Russian interference in Western elections(something the DOJ takes seriously), and shockingly wore a “Trump-Putin ‘16” shirt.
This is in light of the ruling on the Russian slaughter of Alexander Litvinenko on United Kingdom soil a few years prior, the recent investigation into the assassination of whistleblower Alexander Perepilichny, and the attempted murder of Sergei Skripal again on English soil a year prior, which ended up hurting multiple police officers.
Notwithstanding opinions on Russia, Ukraine, Putin, or foreign influence, it’s exceedingly poor taste. Some might say it’s outright treasonous to wear a shirt celebrating a leader implicated in murder plots against citizens of your home nation.
Candace Owens herself has a very unusual interest in Russia. She promotes Russia under the idea that it helps her get closer to her spiritually Catholic roots, which doesn’t begin to make any sense. Catholicism has nothing to do with Russia.
Candace is obsessed with trying to reconcile Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy, while equating the two. This makes no sense; the two have entirely different organizational structures, and much of their core theology is at odds (which caused the Great Schism).
Candace has unironically suggested that by getting a Russian visa, she can “repair the schism,” as if she’s the pope and the patriarch of every branch of Orthodoxy. Surely the unrepentant lesbian who cheated on her husband will save Christendom.
Candace will rave that Russia is superior to the West, that it’s the best place on Earth, and that she wants to know Vladimir Putin personally. It’s odd to call for the schism to be repaired and then denigrate the Western Church.
When the Russia-Ukraine war broke out, she tried to claim it was NATO bombing Kiev in a false-flag attack and claimed it wasn’t a war.
Regardless of your thoughts on the conflict, this is an absurdly pro-Russia view that’s denying reality. In the lead-up to the war, Candace Owens said it was all just a “CIA operation to stoke tensions between Russia and Ukraine.” This mirrored Russian propaganda leading up to the war.
However, as I said at the start, Candace is more of an agent of chaos than of Russia. She loves Putin and clearly supports Russia in the Ukraine war, heavily pushing propaganda. Despite that, she’s also willing to push very odd conspiracies about Russian influence and how TPUSA is a Russian OP.
This feels like something between a lawsuit insurance plan and a sting. Candace openly talks about getting a longer-term Russian visa, presumably before applying for citizenship.
When Candace traveled to Russia, she visited the Kremlin. That isn’t abnormal, but it is pretty on the nose and was boosted by Aleksandr Dugin. Notably, Moscow is about 3 hours from St. Petersburg, which is where she traveled next. So while in Russia, she was traveling quite a bit.
Recently, Candace went to Russia to attend the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF), where the Black lesbian herself gave a speech on tradition.
Alongside the swarthy sapphic saboteur, Vladimir Putin, Aleksandr Dugin, convicted pedophile Scott Ritter, and the American Communist Party’s funder Konstantin Malofeev spoke. The SPIEF is a well-documented hotspot for Russian deep state actors that employ Russian escorts to get kompromat.
The man leading the SPIEF, Sergey Belyakov, got Jeffrey Epstein’s assistant, Svetlana Pozhidaeva, a letter of recommendation for a US visa. Belyakov is a Russian agent trained by the Russian state intelligence service. Belyakov is so connected that he facilitated Jeffrey Epstein’s Russian visa, acting as Epstein’s Russian fixer.
If you notice in Candace’s Russian visa tweet, she’s replying to a key member of the Russian government, Kirill Dmitriev. Sergey Belyakov told Jeffrey Epstein in 2016 that he would be working with the 10-billion-dollar Russian Direct Investment Fund, now headed by Q-anon acolyte Kirill Dmitriev.
Jeffrey Epstein, long after his conviction as a pedophile, was helping to recruit speakers for the SPIEF on behalf of Sergey Belyakov. Jeffrey Epstein’s emails show that Sergey attempted to recruit accused pedophile Woody Allen for the SPIEF.
Epstein also connected former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak and Sergey Belyakov. The events Candace Owens is going to are connected to the Israeli security state.
Candace loves to moralize about the “Epstein class,” at the same time she’s hanging out with Jeffrey Epstein’s Kremlin connections and convicted pedophiles. Candace will rave all day about how if you don’t believe every conspiracy about Epstein, you’re defending him, while attending events that are connected to Epstein’s main partner in the Israeli government and his Russian fixer.
While in Russia, Candace hung out with Pietro Stramezzi (alongside Steven Seagal). Stramezzi notably helps Europeans relocate to Russia. Stramezzi heads the youth wing of “Aristocrazia Europea,” which Roberto Jonghi Lavarini co-founded. Stramezzi himself heads the “Friends of Imperial Russia”
Lavarini was a member of the pro-Russian network called the “World National-Conservative Movement” (WNCM), led by the Russian “Rodina” party. Aleksandr Dugin was originally associated with Rodina before they became too nationalist for him.
The WNCM was considerably associated with the “Russian Imperial Movement(RIM).” RIM is a designated pro-Russia paramilitary terrorist group that has conducted bombings. Although the RIM is critical of Putin, they are tied to Russia’s intelligence agency, the GRU.
RIM’s commanders have served and died in Ukraine. The Russian Imperial Movement is linked to Atomwaffen, Rusich, and the Russian Order of Nine Angles nexion. The Russian far-right is a patchwork of factions that, at some level, collaborate with the state or get crushed like Tesak.
Italian media has also linked Pietro Stramezzi to Vladimir Putin’s special advisor, Anton Kobyakov. Stramezzi openly flexes his connection to Russian arms dealer Viktor Bout, who was convicted of terrorism and providing weapons to Colombian narco-terrorist gangs. Candace has noted arms trafficking as a point of concern, just seemingly not when it’s Russia.
To sum it up, while Candace Owens was in Russia, one of her top associates was someone linked to terrorist groups, gave speeches at the State Duma, is close to top associates of Vladimir Putin, and chills with an arms dealer. Then she spoke at hooker-filled events hosted by Jeffrey Epstein’s Russian intelligence handler, alongside Putin, Dugin, and pedophile Scott Ritter.
Love or hate Russia, that’s incredibly abnormal.
If you wish to support groundbreaking research, subscribe here on Substack or donate on BuyMeACoffee or SupertipGG.
BTC: bc1qpt4n05x2xvv4vxjzdhepuukrs9effdjhhcug4c
ETH: 0xc4B7e14906aCB453443e0B757b9776e91d061F8A
How Critics of Candace Owens Have Failed - Chapter 11
Annoyingly, many critics of Candace Owens engage in similar unrigorous behavior or have a specific political bias. This lack of seriousness and maturity is exactly why Candace gets the leeway she does.
It would be easier to pretend the people who hate Candace are all right. A few do solid work, but overall they’ve done a bad job. If this article is truly fair, the anti-Candace influencers also need a chin check if they want to win.
A few common faulty arguments against Candace Owens ought to be addressed in the name of objectivity. There’s a plethora of digs that can be said that aren’t effective or have questionable truth to them. It’s easy to grift, lie, and “alog” to push any narrative.
A really disgusting instance of that is when Jaimee Michell (gays against groomers) baselessly claimed Candace Owens tried to date her. Then she refused to provide proof and used Charlie Kirk’s death to bolster her creepy sexual fantasy.
I fully denounce such vile behavior. Pushing libelous allegations with no evidence to get clicks is truly pathetic. Using Charlie Kirk’s death to further your bogus assertions is perhaps somehow more revolting.
It makes the work itself harder because you’ve already lied about Candace, so now Candace can dismiss proven allegations much more easily. Jaime Michell needs to recant and apologize, or post evidence; otherwise, Gays Against Groomers has no credibility.
If these points aren’t dismantled, the same mistakes will repeat while Candace gets away with it.
A perfect example is the incessant “her views are down!” posts. If you post this slop, please shut up. Her views can go down 50%; she would still be in the top 10 biggest streamers and top five biggest political streamers. Cherry-picking data for when she’s on a break or just after a break is pure slop. Spoiler: when you reach a certain level of celebrity, whether you’re up or down in the short term is not relevant when you’re a juggernaut.
Another often-invoked talking point is that Candace derailed or “squandered” the post-Charlie Kirk momentum; notably, Hasan Piker praised Candace Owens for it. That’s a very convenient way to absolve yourself of any responsibility and pretend that momentum wasn’t butchered far before Candace made her entire show about doing Charlie Kirk true crime (starting around November to December).
Did Candace have some role in hurting the “momentum” and confusing the topic with endless contradicting theories? Definitely, it’s worth criticizing that she was the biggest influencer confusing the issue, regardless of your thoughts on the topic.
However, that doesn’t stop the government from taking action. The right was already splitting apart due to poor leadership from influencers more interested in infighting with other right-wingers than “destroying the left.” That’s not to absolve Candace Owens of responsibility, but to grapple with the lack of seriousness on the right.
A really annoying compulsion people have is to battle back and forth on the Charlie Kirk case, understandably, but it’s a misplay. People have made up their minds, and it doesn’t matter until the trial is done. The topic shifts away from Candace Owens herself and into intangible ideas.
Much of this isn’t debating the case itself. It’s debating Candace and her orbiter’s theories that aren’t being presented in court and have no bearing on the case. It convinces nobody, distracts from attacking Candace, and distracts from talking about the case when it actually concludes.
If you start debating “did Tyler Robinson murder Charlie Kirk,” then go to “the owner of this smokeshop told me Tyler Robinson wasn’t there,” and then end up at “the contactless credit card purchase had the wrong signature!”, you’ve lost the plot. You’re not debating the actual case, and you’re not debating Candace Owens. This is so down the chain it only serves to benefit Candace.
You can debate if it was Colonel Mustard in the conservatory with the candlestick all day. It doesn’t matter if Tyler Robinson ate bacon for breakfast. Pilpul over hyperspecific details that won’t be presented in court is inherently superfluous. Do you want to win, or do you want endless debates over nonsense?
The reality is, until Charlie Kirk’s murder trial is concluded, there is no evidence either side can state. It’s pure speculation; nobody knows what the prosecutors will present or what the defense has in store. Once it’s concluded, then you can talk evidence, facts, and iron things out.
Engaging in a debate on a trial (particularly vague related conspiracies) that hasn’t occurred is a fool's errand. Just because a side is strongly contending X doesn’t mean you need to put forward Y; instead, you can say, “that hasn’t been proven in court” or “the defense isn’t arguing that, so why don’t you hire attorneys for Tyler if you’re right?”
Obviously, there is a degree of spectacle when Candace Owens says something out there such as, “Charlie Kirk told me in a dream he’s a time traveler! And he has PSI! And he knew the French legionnaires would kill him!” However, that’s intentional: it gets clicks, and it’s incontestable.
It’s engagement farming that perversely benefits both sides, while nuking the quality of the discourse. There’s this expectation of “what crazy thing will Candace say next,” and that’s unhealthy.
If there is a homeless crackhead trying to debate you on Charlie Kirk being a time traveler, you don’t give that person the time of day. Just because a voice is elevated doesn’t mean it’s healthy to engage.
Influencers will inevitably engage in this behavior; it’s a cancerous part of social media. The issue is that when the entire debate revolves around what Candace is saying this week, it means always being on the back foot.
Turning Point USA specifically needs to reconsider their tactics. Some people at TPUSA do great work against Candace Owens, but even then, those are individuals.
As an organization, TPUSA has the resources to make meaningful gains against Candace Owens in so many ways. Any investment in opposing Candace Owens right now will pay off 100x for TPUSA in the long run.
Those who may not fully back TPUSA in all circumstances or agree with everything TPUSA says could focus on the more important topic at hand if they let bygones be bygones.
TPUSA faces a time of serious hardship with the tragic passing of Charlie Kirk and one of its former top stars making it her daily goal to destroy it all. Candace isn’t going to stop anytime soon; she's shown that legal action won’t stop her from talking about a topic. She will milk this for years.
TPUSA should seek out non-aggression pacts with those people against Candace and let go of any prior disagreements or “wars.” A formal rapprochement would benefit everyone but Candace Owens and bad-faith actors. Astroturfed low-T dorks who attack Epstein’s victims and have leaked text messages about their genitals not working won’t help you.
Understand that’s what these grifters fear the most: not rallying behind Candace’s cause. The only people benefiting from this arrangement are Candace and her cult. These October 7th upstarts want to lecture us on what “America First” is.
This middle ground of this back-and-forth disputing Candace’s various claims about TPUSA isn’t working. It just emboldens her conspiratorial audience and gives Candace ammo.
TPUSA needs to go full throttle or move on. Love it or hate it, Candace is coming for TPUSA. TPUSA requires commitment, perseverance, and strategy.
The past is the past. Charlie Kirk is dead—nothing can change that. What can change is the path TPUSA forges forward with a shared common enemy. Together we stand, divided we fall. Is it worth losing to Candace when you can rather fight a common foe with people you might not 100% agree with?
The fact that this article has all this dirt and info on Candace Owens that nobody else has proves the failure of the whole anti-Candace class. A trillion people have talked about Candace Owens, repeated the same talking points, and tried to debunk her.
Yet, I stayed above the fray and didn’t play into her game. I’m the most effective in the world at taking Candace Owens down a notch. Yapping on Twitter or fighting over speculation means nothing if you can’t bring it all home.
All of these attempts have made Candace into a main character she has no right to be. It’s a losing formula.
This is why this article exists: the talking points, rhetoric, and methods need an update. Just saying Candace is “antisemitic,” “crazy,” or a “conspiratorial nutjob” just strengthens her audience. Calling Candace Owens “demonic” is childish. Explaining the hypocrisy is much more effective.
There’s enough data to ascertain what has worked and what hasn’t. Calling her “hateful” or “antisemitic,” with no added commentary, has only grown her platform.
Although many refuse to admit it, Candace Owens represents a large audience with legitimate concerns. The smart move is to make her audience ask fair questions about Candace and why she’s propped up. Candace is formidable, affable, and savvy.
Clip Candace Owens, counter when she lies or gets things wrong, and keep the pressure up. However, keep the wider mission in mind; don’t get stuck in this endless feedback loop of intangible debates or let Candace set the framing.
Debates over Tyler Robinson, Brigitte Macron, or whatever conspiracy of the week she has are secondary to the key pillars. At least until there is a trial, you can meet Candace’s audience where it’s at and actually hurt her credibility, or you can rile them up to make a quick buck playing hero.
The playbook is: Candace Owens is a hypocrite. She pretends to be Catholic while being a lesbian who cheated on her husband. Candace Owens’ Hebrew-speaking, Zionist, anti-free-speech husband owns her business based on anti-Zionism.
Milo Yiannopoulos is blackmailing Candace Owens with a lesbian sex tape, then bragged about being connected to Mossad on her show. None of the influencers who defend Candace call that out. Candace took millions from Larry Ellison, a few months before attacking others for doing the same. Candace Owens is a fraud who misleads her audience about every aspect.
Lord Farmer Conspiracies
One common sentiment over the years is that, due to Lord Farmer, George Farmer’s dad, being a Zionist and the Christian deputy chair and trustee for the Council of Christians and Jews, that reflects onto George and Candace. It isn’t fair to apply Lord Farmer’s politics to his son or stepdaughter, particularly when he disavowed them for those views.
For what it’s worth, that seems hollow, as George Farmer and Candace Owens have since confirmed they’re on good terms with Lord Farmer. George Farmer’s Zionist family gets along well with Candace, and she gets along well with them. This is rather ironic coming from the woman who said she didn’t want Americans who support Israel as her neighbors.
Lord Farmer’s views could theoretically speak to his son, but making that assumption without evidence, as has been done for years, is “low IQ antisemitism.” Candace and George publicly claim they’re still on good terms with Lord Farmer despite his statement against them.
That is pretty odd, particularly given Lord Farmer’s role with the Jewish community in England. However, that doesn’t justify jumping to conclusions, although Candace and George will almost assuredly inherit Lord Farmer’s vast wealth.
The stronger argument is about George Farmer himself. That includes his connections, stances, and the fact that he hasn’t changed. Everything else is dubious at best.
Another attempted attack by people is that George Farmer’s mom is a Rhodesian jew named “Jennifer Anne-Potts.” The issue with that is Lord Farmer’s wife is named “Jennifer D R Potts” according to genealogy websites, with no evidence that she’s Jewish. Candace has already used this to dismiss her critics without clarifying.
Explore Talent Debunked
Arguably, the most popular attack against Candace Owens is the Explore Talent angle. On the surface, this seems like a slam dunk, but when you actually look at the details, it’s a baseless and unpersuasive attack.
The idea is that Candace is some Israeli spy or a media plant because of the Explore Talent website profile, or that she got her start from there as a prostitute. It’s an easy shorthand dig: “Candace is a fraud.”
This conspiracy has been disseminated by both left-wing antifa radicals and right-wing nutjob cranks (the latter of which ironically claim to be arbiters of “high IQ antisemitism”). Milo Yiannopoulos deployed this line of attack multiple times.
This is the type of rhetoric Candace Owens engages in—very “low IQ antisemitism.” Rather than signaling knowledge, it does the opposite.
One of the prevailing issues with this theory is that 11 million people use Explore Talent; it’s reportedly the biggest casting website in America. Are all 11 million of those people secretly Israeli spies?
The Explore Talent angle doesn’t make any sense when you can connect Candace Owens’ career in a dozen different ways to Israel. Ami Shafrir, the owner of Explore Talent, was also defrauded out of 40 million dollars, so if he’s a secret Mossad agent, he might be the worst spy of all time.
Is Ami Shafrir a shady guy? Yes, he seems to be a scam artist. However, there is no tangible way to connect him to Candace Owens. She is a single person among the over ten million listed on the site. This conspiracy is akin to saying Candace Owens is connected to Elon Musk or Mark Zuckerberg because she has an X account and Instagram/Facebook.
You can find examples of people pointing out the website is a scam, then baselessly claim Explore Talent is a human trafficking ring, à la QAnon. The hilarious theory being that Candace Owens was sex trafficked.
If it were some prostitution ring, the last thing you would want is for people to complain about it publicly and to scam clients with petty amounts for jobs that don’t exist. After being around for 20 years, there is not a single shred of evidence in existence to prove that Explore Talent is connected to prostitution or human trafficking in any capacity.
The site has hundreds of negative reviews from people saying it’s been fraudulent for over two decades, and they couldn’t get the promised acting roles advertised. Over 105 reports dating back to 2005 describe Explore Talent as a swindling shakedown.
It isn’t a real agency; it’s a racket. Explore Talent was found liable in court for being a deceptive scam, not for being a secret prostitution ring or human trafficking operation, both of which would be brought up if that were an ongoing issue.
Let’s say Explore Talent was a legit talent agency. Does joining a talent agency make you an Israeli spy?
The sole compelling aspect of the Explore Talent theory is that Candace Owens lies about it not being her account. You can take that as a cover-up if you wish, but to me it just shows she’s a habitual liar. Her email and old phone number registered to Degree180 were registered to the site. It’s possible Candace just forgot, too, although it’s strange she calls it fake.
The Anti-Candace Grifter Class
Unserious buffoons like Aidan Thompson / AFpost, Zero Hour, Tree Of Logic, and Josiah Lippincott spent months spreading knee-slapping “insider” rumors that Candace, a literal lesbian, was romantically jealous of Erika Kirk and loved Charlie Kirk. Nobody should ever take these disreputable clowns seriously.
It will be amusing to see how they desperately try to grift off this essay. This took a great deal of effort, rather than their racemixing cuckold fan-fiction. These people ought to get off the drugs and find a new career. Candace Owens couldn’t ask for a more inept controlled opposition.
Particular Zero Hour or Brian Dipietro / Brian Durant is among the most disreputable people alive. Anyone anti-Candace should unfollow and block 0hour1, the unintelligent liar, because he’s the strongest case for Candace Owens.
Conservative influencers and organizations should be ashamed for giving this grifter the time of day. So much misinformation has come from Zero Hour that you cannot claim to be better than Candace Owens if you boost a compulsive liar who couldn’t dox the broad side of a barn.
Zero Hour has systematically failed to dox everyone around Candace Owens, ranging from her assistant to her “half-sister” (a random Black woman unrelated to Candace). He thinks Delaware is a foreign country and doesn’t understand what a for-profit LLC is. He thinks that marrying a commoner has anything to do with having a royal title. He asserted Candace Owens was a secret muslim because she went to a Catholic retreat.
Zero Hour claimed George Soros and Lord Farmer were connected, then never proved it cause it was a lie. He has endlessly spread a nonsense theory that Candace Owens is a British spy. Zero Brain has claimed he personally cut Candace’s views in half, when in fact they tripled in that same time period.
Zero Hour / Brian Durant / Brian Dipietro posted numerous AI fakes, including ones of Candace Owens herself, which he tries to pass off as legitimate. Zero Hour was the first person to post the AI fake image of a 2018 Milo with George Farmer, implying they’re romantically involved when they didn’t meet until at least late 2024. He declared war on Candace Owens (he’s done this 12 times with no results) and misspelled “Deus” as “Dues,” while saying the Latin equivalent of “Charlie Kirk is God.”
Zero Hour is sincerely mentally ill and a lying grifter. Anything opposing Candace with him involved is doomed to fail; nobody has benefited Candace more. He’s not just garbage at OSINT, but he’s confident in his garbage OSINT. The best way he can take down Candace is to stop commenting on her forever. He has negative credibility.
The Milo Sycophant Class
Likewise, the critics who call out Candace Owens but refuse to call out her ghostwriter, Milo, are doomed. The “high IQ antisemitism” vanguard has called out Candace Owens for years and gotten absolutely nowhere.
In fact, there’s a good argument that they have only empowered Candace because they have submitted to Milo. These careerists seem to care more about taking shots at Candace Owens than about the fact that she’s just verbatim parroting Milo Yiannopoulos, her ghostwriter.
Milo has been one of Candace’s top sources, her ghostwriter, and has organized on her behalf behind the scenes. Milo’s vision is to get MTG, BAP, Cernovich, and other conservative influencers behind Candace Owens. Milo openly details this plan to subvert the right by manipulating them to either ignore, back Candace, or focus on her enemies.
Ultimately, these people are playing into a dialectic where they’re the self-described “high IQ antisemites” who are slaves who take orders from Milo. At the same time, Candace is the low-IQ antisemite golem who takes orders from Milo.
It’s two sides of the same coin, all subservient to a malicious fed. No one here meaningfully challenges Candace Owens.
If these people want to call out Milo for working with Candace and actually revolt against the institution of “alternative media,” I welcome that. This isn't a dig, but an observation of reality.
A great example of this is, again, AFpost and lying Aidan “BlondePete” Thompson. You have AFpost grifting anti-Candace hate; in the same breath, Aidan is on his knees groveling to Milo, the illegal immigrant, for cash like a dog.
That’s when Aidan Thompson isn’t busy saying Milo, Candace’s ghostwriter, shouldn’t be deported for being an illegal immigrant or in Milo’s direct messages, snaking the people he claims to be an ally of. Aidan has no side because he’s constantly trying to play everyone, and he does a poor job at it.
You have situations where Candace replies directly to Milo, repeating his talking points bar for bar. Then, below the very post where this worldview is laid out, this faction will only call out Candace.
These two-faced invertebrates will lash out at Candace for attacking conservatives with lines fed to her directly by Milo, who repeated them a week before. It’s beyond parody.
In other cases, they will endlessly complain that people like Candace Owens squandered the post-Charlie Kirk momentum. They complain that it’s made about Israel and random conspiracies like Charlie Kirk being psychic, rather than the leftists who celebrated it.
These conservative cowards wax poetic about how the left goes unpunished as a result of influencers like Candace Owens, putting their lives at risk. Regardless of whether that’s true or not, these are not the people who can make such claims.
These same duplicitous influencers are in no position to make this criticism. Milo’s biggest sycophants get dossiers from Milo himself before “big” releases. Meanwhile, he serves as Candace Owens’ ghostwriter and a top aide.
Insiders told me Milo shared the Elijah Schaffer story in these group chats before it went public. At the same time, VHS_Archive, Milo’s alog concierge, passed around the files in alog circles, which is publicly confirmed.
Admittedly, there are two groups within this, and they work together. There are the pro-Milo diehards and the pro-MAGA diehards who shilled for Milo up until his deportation. The latter camp is quite funny, as if Milo wasn’t an illegal immigrant the entire time they were collaborating with him.
They were thick as thieves, having a decade-plus history with Milo. They let Milo walk all over them—telling them they didn’t deserve money for rent after they were fired and taking orders to run “gay ops.” They only turned on Milo after his deportation, which was very shortsighted considering they were in bed with him for so long.
If these peons, past or present, provided all their conversations with Milo, there could be room for forgiveness. Until then, they are complicit in abetting Candace Owens.
Let’s be clear: Milo has the same, if not more fervent, stances as Candace Owens, but somehow doesn't get criticism from these people. Whatever your thoughts on Charlie Kirk and Tyler Robinson, these same people hold Milo to a different standard than Candace.
Much like Candace, Milo says Israel killed Charlie Kirk, and Milo says the Jews killed Charlie Kirk. Milo pushes Candace’s Egyptian plane theory. Milo forces the “Tyler Robinson was a patsy, and now they’ll kill him” theory (spoiler: Tyler Robinson is not dead).
Milo told right-wingers not to focus on the left, but on the supposed Israeli assassins. Milo has explicitly claimed that Charlie Kirk’s murder was staged to frame the left.
Know what Milo doesn’t do? He doesn’t say Tyler Robinson was a leftist or killed Charlie Kirk, just like Candace. Milo and Candace are on the same page, with Milo arguably a page ahead of Candace.
Whatever belief you hold, these two are inseparable. I’m not giving my opinion, just pointing out that the same right-wingers who LARP as the anti-Candace Owens vanguard have nothing to say for their identical buddy.
If you refuse to go after the person giving Candace Owens all her talking points, while performatively going after her, you’re not real opposition.
Such grifters don’t get to proclaim the mantle as the anti-Candace vanguard. Do they care more about walking on eggshells to appease Candace Owens’ ghostwriter for retweets, or about the soul of everything they claim to stand for? Step off the Milo plantation, or Candace will keep getting away with it.
How To Defeat Candace Owens
Ultimately, a cottage industry of “anti-Candace” influencers profits from keeping her around. Like Candace's orbiters, they have tied their income and viewership to Candace, just from an opposing perspective. Candace fans see this as a conspiracy, but it’s simply the same perverse incentive Candace orbits have.
This is a common problem with “trolling lolcows”; it’s easier to take potshots than truly destroy said lolcow. It's, contrastingly, a bad move to destroy the person you profit from messing with, so there's a perverse incentive to hold back and take easy shots.
Is there a grand “fed op” coordinated conspiracy to take down Candace Owens by trolling and discrediting her? That doesn't appear to be the case, or they're doing a remarkably bad job, given that this article outdoes all of Candace's opposition.
In actuality, Candace has made many enemies, betrayed former friends, and faces sincere opposition. That opposition is disunified and unserious.
For Candace Owens to be defeated, people who may not concur must come together against a common enemy. Those factions must organize, at least on some level.
Nobody has benefited from this disunity more than Candace Owens. She thrives on chaos and playing both sides off each other.
What would serve everyone but Candace Owens best is a coalition against her until she is diminished. If you believe in truth, regardless of your political position, Candace Owens is your enemy.
This isn’t an unscrupulous gambit where we all pretend to be buddy-buddy, but a refocusing on a very sick liar. An alliance is a long-term pact. A coalition is a short-term truce.
We can maintain our values while acknowledging that, for our values to fight it out truly, there can’t be an unhinged banshee citing her dreams as an academic source on time travel and international assassination plots.
Everyone can duke it out later and see who wins. However, those conversations can only occur if Candace Owens isn’t destroying the quality of our discourse with nonsense.
This is a wake-up call to the anti-Candace opposition: it’s time to get serious, get unified, and get rid of the foxes in the henhouse like Milo, Ian Carroll, and all Candace's enablers. This is your opportunity.
Nobody but Candace gains from her being in the public discourse. She has loyalty to nobody but herself. If pushing Israel was as popular as opposing Israel is now, Candace Owens would happily push hasbara.
Candace is controlled opposition who is flooding the zone to the point where anyone placing trust in her is filled with incoherent hatred and derangement. This is harmful to everyone.
Understandably, some will reject my terms. Likewise, I will critique those who oppose me or make my side look bad. However, there’s no reason for people to focus so much on their ideological brethren when Candace undermines us all.
A lot of these “based” right-wingers will attack each other for being a different shade of “based” a whole lot more than Candace, who we all disagree with. I’ve made peace with my enemies before, and I’m always open to genuine reconciliation.
It’s not just right-wingers; Candace has made inroads into left-wing and liberal circles, attempting to pander using Israel. However, as this article shows, she’s a fraud.
Anti-Zionists have no reason to tie themselves to such an underhanded figure either. Candace discredits the idea more than anyone else.
If everyone works together, we can defeat Candace Owens. Stay on script, keep pushing these points, and stay vigilant against the Candace-class influencers saturating the space. Don’t engagement farm. We don't need to be friends or agree on every topic to recognize we have the same foe.
If you wish to support groundbreaking research, subscribe here on Substack or donate on BuyMeACoffee or SupertipGG.
BTC: bc1qpt4n05x2xvv4vxjzdhepuukrs9effdjhhcug4c
ETH: 0xc4B7e14906aCB453443e0B757b9776e91d061F8A
Becoming Candace—A Social Autopsy - Chapter 12
After everything: what do you truly know about Candace Owens?
Candace Owens is a fraudulent homosexual adulteress. Candace has no values or principles and will betray anyone for the right price. Everything about Candace is deeply Machiavellian.
Candace even lies about her race. On her dating profile, she boldly listed herself as “East Indian.” On her Explore Talent profile, she put herself as Caribbean despite having no real connection, as she was born and lives in America. Candace is desperate not to be black, ironic given she ran "Blexit." At her own bridal shower, outside of her family, she was seemingly the only Black person there.
Candace Owens' response to this piece is predictable: refusing to address my points and attacking me personally. Candace will imply I'm a federal agent, or a foreign actor linked to Israel, or somehow related to her past employers.
Doing her best Regina George from Mean Girls impression, Candace will call me "obsessed." What I'm obsessed with is the truth. The truth is, spaces I've occupied for over 12 years have been gentrified by a reckless, self-important Johnny-come-lately who makes her interpersonal drama the discourse.
Candace has habitually betrayed anything she’s ever stood for when it was opportune to do so, not because she thought it was right. The notion that Candace Owens is a Christian trad wife conservative anti-Zionist stalwart is a farcical joke.
Candace Owens is a trad-cath anti-gay firebrand who launders nonsensical, poor-quality Jew-hatred (“low IQ antisemitism”). Meanwhile, Candace is a two-timing lesbian whose site is run by a philosemitic hardline Zionist who speaks Hebrew with his Chabad friends when he’s not getting backshots.
Nothing about Candace is real. She’s as legitimate as the Egyptian planes coming from Delaware to abduct her or the French-Israeli death squads coming to assassinate her.
Candace Owens is the physical embodiment of the term “low IQ antisemitism.” Candace promotes baseless narratives, blames Jewish people for literally everything, and goes to such lengths that she disconcerts both legit anti-Zionist moderates and hardened White nationalists. Candace discredits all criticism of Israel and any Jewish people she goes after, funnily enough poisoning the well.
One perfect example is Candace Owens’ quarrel with Ben Shapiro. Much of Candace’s notoriety and legitimacy has come from her squabble with Ben Shapiro after she was fired from The Daily Wire. Candace has been hyped up as the “Ben Shapiro and Daily Wire slayer.”
Yet, sloppy Candace Owens routinely gets facts wrong about Ben Shapiro that someone like her should never get wrong. Zalman Shapiro is not Ben Shapiro’s uncle; they live on opposite sides of the country. Zalman has only one sister, Zipporah Schefrin née Shapiro, and no brothers.
Ben Shapiro’s dad and mom have nobody named “Zalman” directly related to them. Ben’s dad has a single brother named “Robert.”
This is the same Candace who will dox entire family trees of witnesses in Charlie Kirk’s case. Still, she cannot be bothered to check her own grand conspiracy about Ben Shapiro’s family being involved in stealing uranium for Israel.
This type of misinformation discredits people who talk about the Apollo Affair. Candace entwines her personal skirmishes with preexisting conspiracy as unsubstantiated fact—this unwarranted self-importance undermines her entire catalog. Candace has suggested before that all criticism against her is just an “Israeli op.”
This clip exemplifies Candace’s blend of her brutish “low IQ antisemitism” and her tendency to shove her foot in her mouth while running defense for Israel.
Candace, who claims not to be antisemitic, goes on to compare Israelis to animals and then backtracks to “it’s the people who support Israel.” Except it’s not Americans who “support Israel” who are at war with Palestinians; it’s Jews in Israel.
It’s paradoxically the worst of both worlds. You get off-putting hatred, dehumanizing a group into animals, the very attack she accuses Jews of doing to non-jews. Then you get Candace deflecting blame from Israel by implying that average Americans who support Israel are “animals” committing a genocide themselves. It’s a caricature of both sides.
The only market for this is remarkably unintelligent people. All this does is delegitimize and confuse the conversation on Israel, on both sides. It’s a Frankenstein-like monstrosity of vibes-based confusion and animosity.
Visceral audience capture is already emerging within Candace’s conspiracy cult. Recently, they turned on the woman reporter in the clip above, Elizabeth Lane (Iza Bendianishvili). The reason was nebulous Google Trends “research” claiming she was googled from Fort Huachuca on September 8th, 2025; Stew Peters claims she’s Jewish (with no proof) and that she allegedly wears a wig.
Cancel culture Candace threw the woman who interviewed her and has cited her on her show over a dozen times under the bus because the Candace influencer class grafted evidence. Candace Owens’ cult explained this away as “Elizabeth Lane was just keeping Candace and Tucker Carlson hostage during their interviews.”
If Elizabeth Lane were a “Russian-Jewish” op, it would still be the fault of Candace and Tucker Carlson for platforming her. If being a “Russian-Jewish op” is a problem, why is Candace hanging with Russians connected to terrorist groups and events hosted by Epstein’s Russian fixer?
The Candace influencer cult should know: you’re next. No hierarchy in the anarchic Candace cult can save you from the self-consuming “everyone is a Jewish / gov op” ouroboros mob.
Candace Owens extensively cited Elizabeth Lane on her premiere “Bride Of Charlie” mini-series and shouted her out 13 times in less than a year. No matter how much you shine Candace’s shoes, you’re not safe, and Candace won’t put her neck out for you.
Going from 18th-century-style antisemitism to liberal Zionism isn’t nuance. It’s being exceedingly wrong in two opposite directions that leads to faulty logic. Truth matters much more than labeling your opponent as “Jewish.”
Candace’s whole thing is opposing Israel. Candace then goes out of her way to try to make liberal Zionist arguments, saying Israelis don’t support the war in Gaza or that Benjamin Netanyahu’s policies don’t represent Israeli public sentiment.
A 2024 Pew poll found only 19% of Israelis thought the IDF went too far; a 2025 Hebrew University poll found 75% of Isreali jews thought there were no innocent civilians in Gaza.
Candace will say all Israelis are “murderous occultic kid rapists.” Then, she will say how Israelis are actually opposed to Benjamin Netanyahu and how it’s merely a problem with the current government. So are Israelis good, or is Candace accusing them all of being satanic pedophiles?
You have situations where Milo’s NATCON plant, Amanda Millius, goes on about how Candace isn’t really antisemitic but actually the Daily Wire is. Self-proclaimed Zionists cover for Candace, then she says Zionists are why the Holocaust is questioned, and that should say it all.
Candace doesn’t say the term “Jewish power” despite mentioning every low-IQ antisemitic theory possible about Jews. She’s said that term twice, both times quoting Ye.
That means Candace is aware of the term, but refuses to address the idea that Jewish people have any degree of power in society or the ability to act as a collective. She wants to distinguish her “Khazarian Frankist” spiritual kookery from real institutions of Jewish power like AIPAC, J-Street, or JINSA. When she does mention these ideas, it’s just a cultural signifier meant to bolster her balderdash.
Candace Owens pushes goofy, ahistorical blood libel that “Frankists” (Jews) ritually murdered individual Christian children in Europe on Passover in an occult ceremony, leading to the foundation of Israel. Screeds about Jews slitting the throats of Christian children to make Israel are halal, but two specific words are haram for Capo Candace.
People are quick to accuse Candace Owens of being “paid by Russia,” “paid by Qatar,” and so on. However, this one-dimensional view ultimately presumes these definitive sides are all opposed to each other. That’s true for smaller and medium-sized actors.
US intelligence tends to recruit these larger political actors. They’re given some leeway and set free to play these various foreign governments, along with their money, against each other.
Look at traitorous Tucker “CIA” Carlson: he gets money from Qatar, but he’ll never be charged under FARA despite being a foreign agent. Tucker’s sellout dickhead of a father was a registered foreign agent for Hungary after his CIA tenure. Lauren Chen’s Russia Today scandal demonstrates this principle; she knowingly took in millions from a foreign government, then got off totally free.
Is it inconceivable that Candace may again take the “7k from Israel,” as she did most of her life? If Candace Owens is lying about her sexual lifestyle, marriage, and, startlingly, her race as she did on her profile, what else is she deceiving the public about?
Her own homosexual public relations manager fantasizes about doing propaganda for the state of Israel. Is that not a conflict of interest, and what does this say about Candace’s brand itself?
More concretely, Candace Owens has remarkably little without her Zionist (allegedly) gay husband. George Farmer funds her sexually degenerate lifestyle, website, and her entire operation. Candace the chameleon has but a single defining characteristic: her calculating turpitude.
It doesn’t matter what Candace is “exposing” or how many people she is “converting,” if their baseline is a worldview anathema to scrutiny, objectivity, and truth itself. She fails to practice what she preaches, from traditional marriage to opposition to Israel.
Conversely, that’s exactly why Candace has success; her vacuous platitudes leave room for people to fill that empty void with their interpretation of what “Candace Owens” is and believes. There is no real “Candace Owens,” only what people perceive as Candace Owens.
Throughout modern history, several dishonest hucksters have built brands on fraud. This ranges from televangelists like Kenneth Copeland to cult leaders like L. Ron Hubbard, or even politicians like George Santos. Dishonesty and hype to grow a public image are not a new phenomena.
What is new is that when people with large platforms get exposed, there's some comeuppance. With Candace Owens, this isn’t the case. Candace gets exposed for getting facts wrong, pushing misinformation, or spreading falsehoods, but she gets rewarded instead without ever actually addressing her mistakes.
As tackled at the start, Candace Owens on March 6th, 2025, declared that court docs would expose Taylor Swift as a secret lesbian who had a lavender situationship with Blake Lively. This wasn’t Candace “asking questions”; the entire segment was about a lavender-marriage conspiracy that led to the accusation.
When those court docs came out, Candace was fully proven wrong; they did not contain a secret lesbian relationship. Candace then proceeded to post a Taylor Swift and Blake Lively clip named “I WAS RIGHT ABOUT TAYLOR SWIFT AND BLAKE LIVELY.” Naturally, Candace never addressed this, nor did she bring up this fabled sapphic Swift-Lively liaison.
Candace’s shameless hubris is her greatest strength. She can be proven wrong countless times, but persists as if she were always right. The gravity of that hubris is so extreme that she can lie or get details wrong; however, by the time she’s fact-checked, there are a dozen new mistruths.
The copious amount of doxing Candace Owens engages in is unmatched for someone her size. To tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands, she openly calls for people and their entire families to be doxed.
Without exaggeration, anytime I tune in, she’s doxing random people and their families. Nobody uses their platform more irresponsibly than Candace, because anyone else would be banned for doxing half as much.
Embodying her recklessness, Candace Owens doxed Charlie Kirk’s MRN number, HIPAA-protected data, then later censored the VOD. That wouldn’t be a crime for Candace, but it’d be for the medical source who leaked it. Candace showing this proved nothing; the nurse who leaked this threw away their career and livelihood. That is a cult.
Naturally, Candace’s cult gaslit about her exposing Charlie Kirk’s medical information to tens of thousands live and attempted to suppress that with community note abuse. People who sniped it live caught this.
Candace’s cult exhibits a sunk cost fallacy; there’s no accountability, and any calls for responsibility are smeared as a perfidious Jewish or fed plot. Despite this article with confirmed digital forensics, which shows Candace Owens is a lesbian who seemingly had an affair, and that she’s giving her customers info to a dedicated Zionist, I will still be slandered as some “Jewish fed” for speaking the truth.
The platform Candace Owens has cultivated is uniquely hazardous. No media figure in news or politics has ever so brazenly disregarded reality to the detriment of themselves, society, and truth. Candace Owens is now facing multiple lawsuits as a result of this conduct.
Candace has put multiple innocent lives in danger by accusing them of murder and siccing her mob on them. At this point, Candace’s crusade is the modern equivalent of the Salem Witch Trials, with close to as many accused of being involved in Charlie Kirk’s death as those executed in the Salem Witch Trials.
A prime example is Hunter Kozak, the man who spoke to Charlie Kirk last and witnessed his brutal murder. After Candace decided to make him a target unprompted, dehumanizing him by saying he deserved to be hated, Candace's cultists started showing up around where his two young children live.
Hunter Kozak’s children were so at risk that he had to move to protect his family. Candace Owens incited death threats, serious in-real-life harassment that targeted children, and it got to the point where innocent people had to rearrange their lives due to Candace’s reign of terror. After this interview, Candace’s fans then doxed his wife for no reason and falsely claimed she worked for TPUSA with zero evidence.
Candace rewards her goons for persecuting, harassing, and doxing the families of random people. Candace’s henchman, Baron Coleman, doxed Hunter Kozak’s entire family over six hours in two streams for no discernible reason. Candace rewarded Baron Coleman with hosting her show while she’s on maternity leave.
The case in question, Charlie Kirk’s murder, comes with a death penalty. When you accuse random people of being involved or doing it, you are effectively calling for their death.
Out of fear, the random people she harasses are forced to apologize to clear their names, merely for being on the scene of a traumatic murder, as if they did anything wrong. Where’s the justice for Kolby Sessions?
If you truly believe that Charlie Kirk’s death involved conspiracy, these witch hunts destroy any chance of finding the truth. When you get facts this wrong multiple times, it undermines your integrity on this topic.
Targeting every single person who is on the scene of a murder is not intellectually rigorous or rational. No investigation is conducted this way—it’s ineffective, ex nihilo, and arbitrary. It’s not possible to conjure up a solid prosecutable case from nothing.
Candace characterizes this as looking under every rock. It’s more analogous to slamming your head against a rock until you have an aneurysm. Citizen Candace isn’t Citizen Kane.
Candace has deputized her fans to citizen-arrest anyone she deems “suspicious.” Candace was eight months pregnant at this time, so when she calls for her enemies to be detained by civilians, this is inciting her rabid fans.
Normally, you could take this as a joke. However, Candace is mixing this with genuine accusations of her enemies covering up a murder to an audience of millions of people.
Candace has traded her credibility as Charlie Kirk’s second-in-command, then the top person at PragerU, then the most-viewed person at Daily Wire. All leading up to shifting the Overton window on reality.
Candace walked a line for years by “just asking questions.” Candace grew her platform, got accolades as an African-American woman repping MAGA. When she hit an audience-size ceiling, she went off the deep end into mendacity. Yet she unabashedly marches on, more extreme than ever.
Now, she’s trying to lead the boomers, the wine moms, and anti-Zionists she cultivated off the cliff of unadulterated anti-intellectualism. It’s vibes-based research, citing dreams, premonitions, and “I don’t know, but I know” like she’s Obi-Wan Nairobi.
Candace is tapping into a vulnerable part of the human psyche, and using her large platform, she is converting susceptible people into neuroses they wouldn’t have otherwise. She exploits people searching for the truth by peddling countless clashing truths that undermine each other, packaged into a grab-bag worldview that works if you don’t ask questions or think about it.
It’s easy to mock Candace Owens; entire pages are dedicated to clipping her lack of basic reading and pronunciation skills. Candace has been exposed countless times for not doing research, lying about Charlie Kirk’s pastor, or getting details wrong, like time zones. These debacles will keep happening. None of that matters, and Candace is enabled to do very dangerous acts.
If Candace Owens were truly searching for the truth, why dox a witness in the Charlie Kirk case who’s a police officer, along with their entire family, to millions of people? This intimidates other witnesses, makes people less encouraged to speak, and sets a dangerous precedent that you will have your dirty laundry aired if you testify.
Engaging with this notion—that you believe it’s a show trial, or this woman is a patsy, or it’s all a “Mormon op”—letting them, along with other witnesses, expose themselves would be the play, not actively creating a climate of fear around a trial that censors speech while that trial is still occurring.
This is a deeply bewildering move in a trial you claim you want to find the truth in. Doxing the witnesses' families doesn’t help anyone during the trial itself.
The framing is exceptional too; Candace Owens rose to prominence from opposing “Black Lives Matter” and anti-cop sentiment. Now, Candace doxes police officers, their innocent families, and downplays a violent gang murder (the same Charlie Kirk’s last words were about) for that police officer daring to testify under oath in the middle of a trial.
Candace Owens demanded 300k upfront for a debate about her best friend’s murder, as if she’s a ghetto Lara Croft. Not only that, she had on Super Chats, ran YouTube ads, and ran five separate ad breaks. Candace and her family are worth an estimated 200 million dollars—she’s easily making 2m+ a month from YouTube, her website subscription, ad reads, and merch.
If you truly wanted to figure out the truth about your best friend’s murder, as a multi-millionaire with a personal net worth somewhere in the eight to nine figures, why not donate that sum to Tyler Robinson’s defense fund if you believe Tyler Robinson is innocent of murder?
Candace and her orbiting grifters go on about how Tyler Robinson is being railroaded by his public defender, who’s suppressing the truth. Why not be benevolent and purchase him a real private attorney if you want your evidence truly litigated?
It doesn’t matter if you think Tyler Robinson was involved in any capacity or not. A lawyer hired by Candace could make her arguments and present her evidence in court. This would cost at most 2-3 episodes of her show; if she's feeling particularly greedy, she could fundraise for it directly, too.
If you think Tyler Robinson was involved, but simply not the murderer, that’s a legal strategy. Candace, whose family is worth hundreds of millions, can afford to pursue it. Why would Candace not put her money where her mouth is when it comes to the murder of her best friend?
If Charlie Kirk’s death and the facts surrounding it truly matter to Candace Owens, why is this evidence not being litigated in court on her dime? Put up or shut up.
In December of 2025, Candace Owens talked about not making a single cent off of the Charlie Kirk case. The fact that she demanded 300k to debate Charlie Kirk’s murder totally undermines the claim she never made a cent or wanted to.
On its face, this was an egregious lie considering that every episode of her show covering Charlie has ads on the page and ad reads in her streams, with Super Chats now. No single person has financially benefited more from Charlie Kirk’s death than Candace Owens.
All of these people are making money off the trial and doing the “true crime” brainrot. When push comes to shove, they provide no meaningful assistance to a supposedly innocent person they assert is being falsely accused of murder.
Internet virtue signaling means nothing versus a 300k legal fund. Would it not be their fault if Tyler Robinson were wrongfully convicted because they had a chance to help, but didn't?
Beyond her existing media clout, Candace Owens has cobbled together enough fringe audiences from different circles. Her wide platform grants those ideas legitimacy, regardless of how legitimate they are. No matter how insane what she says is or what immoral thing she does, it’s immaterial.
Candace Owens has an ever-rotating table of conspiracy-rich communities to draw from: “transvestigation,” anti-Zionism, Mormon conspiracies, celebrity gossip, GATE, time traveling, World War 2 revisionism, the manosphere, anti-Trumpism, government psyops, Charlie Kirk trutherism, defending child murderers like Lindsay Clancy and so on. It doesn’t matter if this episode doesn’t cater to you; there’s always another.
If anyone else were pushing these narratives, they would have been immediately banned from YouTube, Patreon, Facebook, Apple, and Spotify. Instead, Candace isn’t only boosted with effectively zero censorship when she violates TOS, but is fully monetized on all these platforms, including YouTube. The system fully enables Candace.
The few times Candace has been punished are so minor they don’t compare to what conservatives or anti-Zionists faced before 2023. When Candace Owens blatantly broke YouTube’s terms of service in 2023, the only “punishment” was that YouTube didn’t monetize a few videos.
In 2024, when she released a Ye interview, YouTube took down the full video and disabled her Super Chats for a year before restoring them. This only happened because Ye is legitimately debanked and censored.
Seldom does one have their YouTube Super Chats yanked for a terms of service violation, then have them reinstated via the YouTube Partner Program. Candace continued breaking TOS, openly doxing, misgendering, harassing, and even having guests repeatedly drop slurs—then she got fully remonetized.
In 2018, when she got labeled as far-right, a term she now associates with, the CEO of Twitter, Jack, got on his knees begging for mercy while suspending right-wingers en masse. People with sincere beliefs get punished; meanwhile, Candace profits off their backs.
I don’t agree with censorship, but it’s not a level playing field. Candace is intentionally elevated, and that doesn't leave room for anyone else to share similar beliefs. Candace Owens shouldn’t be censored; however, anyone else should get the same privileges she does.
To test this, I made an alt account and watched one Candace stream, along with dozens of other videos and streams. The result was that Candace was a “YouTube feature” above all other content. Candace Owens is artificially boosted to a significant extent in ways other critics of Israel aren’t.
These are privileges afforded to nobody else, a double standard only benefiting Candace. Comparably far less radical people than Candace, such as Alex Jones, LeafyisHere, or Clavicular, are entirely banned from YouTube. That should make you ask: why, and who exactly, is allowing it? Moreover, why does Candace never speak up about YouTube’s censorship of others?
If I were the government, a foreign power looking to sow chaos, or some nefarious cabal of Zionists, my top Manchurian Candidate in 2026 would be Candace Owens. The conspiracy and radicalism have reached a fever pitch; what better way is there to discredit all of it than with a Typhoid Mary, or in this case, a Typhoid Candy?
There’s a reason she’s not just pushed on YouTube, but fully monetized and has yet to be de-banked or banned anywhere. Anyone else pushing her ideas would face suppression, if not outright blacklisting. Contrary to the idea that she’s “challenging power,” she defangs the real opposition to power and misleads the masses into a non-stop frenzy.
Candace is in the preselected club of controlled-opposition media. This class of “alternative media” influencers is allowed to say wild things about Israel or Jews because they practically never give serious analysis. I would define this clique as “Antisemitism Inc.”
Candace still pushes the debunked Khazar theory and claims jews are just secret Turks, a long-debunked theory with no scientific basis that no serious antisemite pushes in 2026. If the Israelis aren’t “the real jews,” who exactly is?
Candace sits alongside Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Ian Carroll, Milo, and that entire kosher antisemite influencer class. The Israel-critical class has been so ghettoized and ostracized that they don’t understand the “great replacement” has occurred in their influencer class in hopes of containing them. Buchananites, isolationists, and foreign policy experts replaced with crackpots, cultists, and grifters.
If you’re opposed to Zionist influencers: Ben Shapiro, Laura Loomer, or anyone like that, Candace Owens is your real enemy. Candace and her allies like Tucker Carlson give these people untold credence. What’s easier to dunk on than proclaimed anti-establishment stalwarts who say “math is Jewish” or cannot pronounce anything correctly?
Pothead dullards such as Ian Carroll will tell you Candace Owens isn’t the establishment anymore, but also that she was always real. How does that make sense: so the establishment created Candace, but she’s the same person as always, yet suddenly she’s not the establishment now?
Just because Candace Owens is counter-establishment doesn’t mean she’s not the establishment. Conservative circles, particularly “reformed conservatives,” have a history of the counter-establishment becoming the establishment.
The idea that the biggest political streamer in the world, fully protected by the establishment, isn’t part of the establishment is ludicrous. These out-of-touch loons try to sell someone whose family is worth hundreds of millions as “just one of us.”
Russia doesn't control YouTube. During the Ukraine war, RT got nuked off YouTube and most platforms. The US government controls Google and YouTube; therefore, the US government is effectively platforming Candace Owens. Most edgy influencers lose access to Stripe, Google AdSense, and payment platforms, yet not Candace.
There’s an expression core to conspiracy: “Qui bono?” Candace Owens' greatest beneficiaries are the same people she rallies against. She benefits, the government benefits, the “Epstein class” (as she calls it) benefits, and the American public loses.
Candace Owens is a hydra; debunk one conspiracy she pushes, and two crazier ones pop up. Normally, anyone like this would be dismissed as a loon and exiled from polite society.
Because Candace was so big before this, the establishment has let her serve as a pressure-release valve for more radical elements and a token strawman. She is allowed to exist because she discredits the side she purports to represent, meanwhile gatekeeping genuine threats to power.
Earlier in Candace’s career, she opposed illegal immigration, vocally fought against anti-White racism, and called out spiteful mutants who promoted White genocide. Candace used her mainstream platform to move the conversation forward, which was noble.
Since getting off the mainstream media circuit, Candace has mentioned “anti-White” once, “White genocide” once, and “illegal immigration” eight times. Agree with the ideas or not, the lack of coverage clashes with everything Candace once stood for. They call this “switching up on your day ones.”
Now, Candace calls for a left-right alliance. A month before Charlie Kirk’s murder, he was on tour expressly calling out the Marxist left Candace now promotes.
Before her “alternative media” debut, Candace championed conservative values. Her “White Lives Matter” T-shirt stunt with Ye in Paris illustrated how radical they were.
It’s worth contemplating: does Candace think White lives matter? Or was it just another phony slogan for her to get clicks from, like the rest of her media career? If Candace actually cared about White lives, where is the sympathy for the 80 percent of opioid overdose victims who happen to be White at the hands of the Sackler family?
Candace Owens’s entire existence is inherently contradictory. Nothing about her makes sense. She’s phony.
Those globalist Zionist elites she’s going after? Her husband, who funds her career, is one. Those closeted “globo-homo” liberals she’s uncovering? Candace is one.
The “Epstein class” honorable Candace Owens rallies against? She has a deep relationship with them; she has dinner with John Mappin, regularly boosts him, and they go to Iceland together. That’s despite him being in Epstein’s black book and in the Epstein files. When she’s not with John Mappin, she’s at events hosted by Jeffrey Epstein’s Russian fixer.
The Israeli intelligence-connected pedophiles blackmailing world leaders that Candace the truthteller is laying bare? Candace herself is being extorted into working with an infamous blackmailer who bragged on her own show about his connections to the Mossad, in addition to saying 13-year-olds can consent. This level of intellectual dishonesty deserves scrutiny.
Candace Owens represents the Netflix-ification of media, news, and politics. Every story about real people becomes a true-crime drama storyline. Each conspiracy is a never-ending rabbit hole.
Everyone who stands against Candace is the new villain of the week. Entertainment and spectacle outrank facts and truth. Even with this essay revealing many of Candace Owens’ dark secrets, many of her fans will choose a fun, fake world of conspiracy over a harsh reality.
The reality is, Candace spent her entire adult life supporting Israel and Jews before deciding they were all evil, without disclosing any “tea.” Then, after October 7th, she continued to work for a pro-Israel outlet that has arguably the most prominent supporter of Israel, Ben Shapiro, on its staff.
Candace Owens didn’t quit Daily Wire—they fired her. If Daily Wire hadn’t fired her, she’d be happily taking money from a bureaucracy she calls a “Zionist propaganda machine.”
She would be on the payroll of Ben Shapiro, whom she calls an “Israeli asset.” If Candace had true anti-Zionist bona fides, why take checks from Daily Wire and Ben Shapiro almost a year after October 7th?
If you truly oppose Israel, it doesn’t make any sense to back Candace Owens. She was lying back then, and she’s lying now. The man running her business is a Hebrew-speaking, self-proclaimed lifelong Zionist with Israeli politician friends. She took money from Oracle’s Larry Ellison into early 2025.
Candace has misled her core anti-Zionist audience with her ardently pro-Israel husband, who advocates for antisemitic hate speech laws, which she’s never disclosed. Candace betrayed her Zionist audience, who made her entire career.
Why should anyone, particularly a group of people who talk about
Zionist conspiracies,” back a self-proclaimed anti-Zionist stalwart who to this day allows an Israel-linked crypto-Zionist to operate her whole business and have access to all customer data? Is that not a red flag?
What about Candace Owens taking a multi-million-dollar deal from the CIA’s Larry Ellison and then sweeping the evidence when she was called out? Or Candace going on the ADL podcast circuit?
How can anyone trust Candace Owens when she proclaims a traditional Catholic brand image entirely at odds with her “clit licking” sexuality? Her husband is credibly accused by multiple men of getting railed by brown men.
Nothing about Candace Owens is real. Candace has systematically lied about everything, time and time again. Inauthentic, dishonest frauds have no place in politics or celebrity commentary, let alone criticizing Israel.
Everything about Candace Owens is not what it seems. RealCandaceO’s entire life is an artificial construct, a deliberately calculated deception, a fabricated illusion making a mockery of reality itself.
The only option is for the anti-Candace faction to unify. Candace Owens threatens truth itself. She harms the causes she claims to back while undermining those she opposes too. Nobody benefits except for Candace.
We may have different “truths,” but we’re all seeking the truth from our own subjective perspectives. Candace Owens can’t be honest about who she is, where she gets her money from, or the beliefs of the person who owns her business.
Candace Owens isn’t “redpilling” anyone. To “redpill” someone, you need to recognize a hidden reality or truth, not gain an irrational worldview.
Candace harms us all, and in that, we need to find a common enemy despite any difference of opinion. One on one, Candace and her cult may outnumber us, but together she can be defeated.
This is about truth, justice, and what is right. We must defeat Candace Owens and the Candace class, together. Victory is in your hands, if you so choose to accept it.
Share the story and subscribe to join me for part 2 as we examine the full history of Candace Owens, along with all Candace cult members.
Donate on BuyMeACoffee or SupertipGG to support my research if you don’t have Substack. I am fully independent with no backers.
BTC: bc1qpt4n05x2xvv4vxjzdhepuukrs9effdjhhcug4c
ETH: 0xc4B7e14906aCB453443e0B757b9776e91d061F8A
Incredible article! Candace Owens needs to disappear forever.
Can’t believe there was a time when I listened to Owens or Milo (I was such a fag in high school) Good Lord does the right need a hard purge