The James Lindsay Affair: Sexting, Swinging and Sex Cults

The lewd messages, a tell all interview with the ex-mistress of James Lindsay, his relation to the sex cult NXIVM and details on his Zionist funding.

Source: ImperiumFirst

James Lindsay is many things: a swinger, a paid shill, and a sex pest with a close friendship with one of the top supporters of a pedophile sex cult leader. Everything is revealed with his Nazi Fräulein.

Today, I’m arguing that James Lindsay is a malicious, destructive person who has betrayed his entire family, his fans, and everything he ever stood for.

James Lindsay has about a dozen sex scandals in waiting, including from women who have extorted him, so let me break the dam on the first one. If you want to access the whole interview, purchase a Shaggystack sub to read the article.

You might know James Lindsay from his fame gained across four appearances on Joe Rogan (here, here, here, and here). You may know about James Lindsay for popularizing the term “woke right,” which he has written essays on, and that dominates search results when you Google the term.

You may know James Lindsay for his prominence as an activist opposing Critical Race Theory. Most notably, James Lindsay launched his career with the “Grievance Studies Affair.”

After today, James Lindsay will be famous for a different kind of “affair.”

I have the messages of him sexting a mistress while married to his wife, Heather. Not just a confirmation that it happened, but the logs themselves, including the sexts.

This woman slept with James and had dinner with him multiple times. She was friends with James Lindsay and his wife for years.

James Lindsay has already tried to preempt this topic by labeling it “doxing.” All the names mentioned are public information that James has shared. No “doxing” is occurring.

The only name mentioned is James Lindsay’s wife, whose name James himself has posted numerous times, along with her picture. James even posted a video with his wife’s breasts in full display (archive).

This is ironic, given James Lindsay’s attempt to dox and blackmail his enemies. James Lindsay is the only doxer, and he goes after anyone critical of him in their personal lives.

This testimony comes from an anonymous former mistress of James Lindsay, who spoke to him from 2020 to early 2023 and with whom he had sex with at least once. This woman is now a faithfully married Catholic woman who regrets her time with James Lindsay. Do not harass her; having sex with James Lindsay is torturous enough already.

My ultimate goal is to get James Lindsay to stop scandalizing his wife and call out his subversive nature. Regardless of whether she consents to an open marriage or not, he is humiliating her, his family, and undermining his core ethics. James deserves this; he’s tried to cancel so many people nastily, so he needs to learn what it feels like.

Conservatives like DataRepublican cite James Lindsay as the foundation of their worldview and attempt to continue his work under a more professional guise. This whole ecosystem that boosts James Lindsay and tries to defend and revive his legacy deserves scrutiny.

James Lindsay is malignant to the people he backs and who back him: Jews and Zionists. Mystery Machine News isn’t in the business of giving free advice; however, James Lindsay is a remarkably toxic person whose sole mission in life is to cancel others, myself included.

James Lindsay is a rare specimen. He alienates regular conservatives, Zionists, and anyone vaguely nationalist. I can understand anti-Zionists going, “Why stop the enemy when they’re making a move?” because James Lindsay harms innocent people too, including his very family.

I’m not alone in this view either; Yoram Hazony‘s son independently reached a very similar conclusion (although I disagree with the lens). Jews and Zionists are starting to realize James Lindsay is a walking liability, as he has become an albatross around the neck of the anti-CRT movement.

The specific argument made by BAP ally Michael Anton and Yoram Hazony’s son, Hadar, that “James Lindsay is a groyper / akin to groypers” doesn’t hold up to scrutiny and isn’t useful. Somewhere within their deep abyss, trolls generally have souls, an aspect James Lindsay lacks.

Jews and Zionists comparing what they may see as misguided young White men to a fully grown adult collecting a 6+ figure salary doing this as his career trivializes the argument. Obviously, James Lindsay is not a “groyper”; this type of absurd argument only enables James Lindsay.

Trying to use “groyper” as a slur only shows how rent-free they live in anyone using it that way’s head. It doesn’t properly communicate James Lindsay’s earnest subversion.

A more apt comparison, which I have to credit to Captive Dreamer for publicly originating in some fashion, would be Candace Owens. I independently came to the same conclusion while writing this article many months ago, but the comparison is obvious to anyone with insight into either figure.

James Lindsay isn’t concerned with truth. All he cares about is being a bull in a china shop for the right, destroying people’s lives and slandering them over the smallest of differences or based on “vibes,” much like Candace Owens.

Apropos of that, when I went against the most prominent anti-Zionist podcaster, Candace Owens, James Lindsay effectively sided with Candace over me, trying to undermine me. My entire piece was about hypocrisy; I had a whole chapter on it (chapter 3), but James yapped at me, claiming I only made it about the lesbian aspect, and then tried to take jabs at me for doing what he could never do.

If people don’t want to back me, that’s their prerogative. However, when you take shots at me for being effective, understand there’s an astronomical price. I’m not Milo; I can actually hurt your career.

This article was written far before the Candace article came out, so understand it’s not personal in that sense. It is personal in the sense that it embodies the failure of James Lindsay’s ideology and his garbage cancel culture-driven personality that mirrors the “woke right” idea. I’m merely doing to James what he failed to do to me: discredit.

The Leaked Sexts And Interview

Context is needed to understand the hypocrisy. In all fairness, James Lindsay technically isn’t cheating on his wife or getting cheated on by her.

James Lindsay now claims to be a Christian. As a result, he's sinning against his wife by engaging in this sexually promiscuous lifestyle, scandalizing her and making a mockery of the union between man & woman.

This shows the email versions of the message notifications because his ex-mistress’s account was banned. As the evidence shows, this made the messages' authenticity easier to verify.

To clarify what can be confirmed: the authenticity of the messages that match dates that align with when they were written, her meeting James Lindsay on at least one occasion, and her being in contact with James Lindsay and her wife. This is an allegation, but a myriad of pieces of evidence back it.

James Lindsay is a swinger in an open relationship. My understanding is this is one-sided: James Lindsay can have sex with whoever he wants, but that is not reciprocal. His wife is not bisexual or a lesbian.

Being a homosexual is not among the allegations lobbed at James Lindsay, despite appearances. James Lindsay is also not a “cuck”; despite it being an easy narrative, apparently it is a one-way relationship.

These claims must be addressed, as several liars, including Milo Yiannopoulos and Patrick Casey, have mishandled this story.

James Lindsay is very horny. James Lindsay goes on an extended lust-driven rant about “wanting to grope” his mistress from behind, before “fingering” her.

James Lindsay then details his desire for a “mind-blowing blowjob.” James Lindsay likely has thousands of messages like this with women.

James Lindsay sent her a few dick pictures and numerous shirtless photos. Apparently, dozens of shirtless photos. In this case, it was a shirtless picture.

James Lindsay activates his rizz, going, “damn girl looking sexy tho”. Not content to be only a master of swords, James Lindsay intends to master seduction.

James Lindsay employs his fabled rizz. He tries to captivate his then-current mistresses by saying, “might have to drive you crazy then,” then deploying the smiling imp emoji—a true Casanova.

James Lindsay flirts, begging the woman for pictures: “haha I’ll sign up for your only james,” kiss emoji, tongue-sticking-out emoji. One can only speculate how drenched a maiden’s panties would be after this courtship.

James Lindsay rizzes up the ladies with talk of destroying Blackrock.

James Lindsay vents that he hates everyone and tries to tell the woman how she doesn’t hate him (she does).

Some portion of degenerates will claim that’s “based,” and James Lindsay is a “chad” for having sex outside of his marriage. Certain untalented has-beens have proliferated this narrative incorrectly to malign James Lindsay as a “cuck.” According to multiple people involved, that’s tragically not the case; it's just the vibe.

What is relevant is that James Lindsay regularly attacks swingers, the swinger lifestyle, and involving your family with that. That’s the right position, but James Lindsay doesn't live up to it in his actions.

In 2021, when discussing the formation of the Frankfurt School and cultural Marxism, James Lindsay criticized the practice or preaching of non-monogamy. James Lindsay’s dialectic is based on an opposition to communism/totalitarianism, including cultural Marxism — the reality is there’s nothing more cultural Marxist than polyamory, otherwise known as “free love.”

He [György Lukács] pushed the narrative that monogamy is bad and not natural and in fact should be made fun of it should be mocked and of course parents who are trying to teach you this conservative moral sexual ethic are backwards and they deserve to be you know also mocked and that deserves to be rejected that's causing the problems of society

By James Lindsay’s own logic, he would be a woke cultural Marxist. He is opposing the patriarchal view on traditional marriage and doing cultural Marxist activism, no different than an anti-fascist at a protest, throwing a Molotov cocktail at a cop car.

Now this isn’t “ideal”; James Lindsay’s wife getting banged by a horde of immigrant men and blue-haired women would be more in line with the ideal of bucking patriarchy. Still, by rebelling against the societal norm of monogamy, even if still under some auspices of patriarchy, James Lindsay is doing Marxist praxis by being an adulterer.

Herbert Marcuse, one of the top philosophers at the Frankfurt School, argued in “Eros and Civilization” that capitalism controls individuals by repressing their instincts, channeling sexual energy exclusively into monogamous and family-unit reproduction. In reclaiming "Eros," that would break patriarchal norms imposed by society and destroy traditional heterosexual geniality.

Even if James Lindsay were to be openly pro-swinger, does such a person really belong in the conservative movement? James Lindsay goes around all day trying to lecture people as some vanguard, attacking the “woke right.” It’s a lot more “woke” to be in an open marriage than it is to oppose Israel.

How We Know It’s Authentic

First, this hilarious photo is from April 7th, 2021. This is from Snapchat. This is the ex-mistress and James Lindsay.

Second of all, if you notice, James Lindsay changes his Twitter display name often, particularly early on, sometimes multiple times a month. These match the screenshots exactly. August 2020, “Captain Deathstar Underpants”. April 2022, “champion manspreader”. May 2023, “has discernment”. August 13-16th, 2020 “Has A Massive…. Evil”.

Specifically, the “mind-blowing blowjobs” message can be confirmed. Around this period, James Lindsay was changing his display name often, up to multiple times a week.

Archives from that exact day, August 13th, 2020, match. 3 days before, it doesn’t match. 7 days after, it does not match. 3 days after, on August 16th? It matches.

This level of detail would be nearly impossible to recreate or fake without insanely extensive research.

If the emails were fake, it would be far easier to fake the messages themselves and would be unnecessary to add these specific details where I, or whoever supposedly faked them, could have gotten it wrong.

To fake this would require memorizing the specific order of 3-4 name changes a week from over half a decade ago. It would be very easy to make a mistake and end up with the wrong display name or date. The evidence is remarkably consistent.

Here is the ex-mistress’s mailbox. This does not count her Instagram or Snapchat messages with James, both of which are unfortunately banned or deleted.

Here’s a screen recording of her email inbox, showing that there’s a large number of messages with James Lindsay.

If for some reason you still doubt the authenticity, here’s a screen recording of the “mind-blowing blowjobs” direct message with scrolling and the IOS screen.

So yes, these messages are real. There’s a picture of her with James Lindsay. She shared a lot of her communications with me. She shared insights that weren’t public at the time and were later confirmed. I was also given other details that confirm it was real, but I will not share them because it's personal information.

My Interview With James Lindsay's Ex-Mistress

A more in-depth version of the interview is exclusively available for paid Shaggystack subscribers, as this article would risk being too long at over 10k words. Let's go over some highlights.

Here, the ex-mistress details how James Lindsay and his wife identify as swingers. James Lindsay is worried about his “handlers” finding out about his sexual escapades. James Lindsay goes to conservative political events to find women to have sex with.

James Lindsay openly admits he has “handlers.” These handlers determine whom he speaks to, what he does, and what his message is.

This is not tongue-in-cheek. They exert real influence over James Lindsay, and he's at their behest. James Lindsay told his ex-mistress he couldn’t be seen talking to her because she supported Nick Fuentes.

This ex-mistress of James Lindsay had sex with him at least once in April 2021. He flew out to her, got her “black out drunk,” and went to town.

It was all totally consensual, to be clear; James Lindsay is not a rapist, just a weirdo. You’re entitled to find that predatory personally, but the woman did not.

James Lindsay is a major exhibitionist who’s a porn addict. His only hesitation is his donors.

James Lindsay’s wife, Heather, managed his “side pieces.” She would set a timeframe for when James Lindsay was allowed to speak with them, then demand time for herself to speak with the women.

James Lindsay was so broke that he and his wife fought over money. They were waiting for the money to come in from Lindsay's book “Cynical Theories.” This was all confirmed by both James Lindsay and James Lindsay’s wife, Heather, to the ex-mistress.

James Lindsay’s wife had to start doing massage therapy out of her backyard. She was still earning more than James Lindsay.

These sexual escapades were so common that James Lindsay got extorted by one of his muses. Seemingly, one of the girls was demanding money from James Lindsay, or he would have exposed his degenerate lifestyle. Little did she know, James Lindsay is broke.

Step-Daughter Saga

For the record, the daughter in this saga is the same one James Lindsay used to prove he’s super down with the kids. James Lindsay brought up how he was checking out “women’s asses together” with his 20yo stepdaughter (James Lindsay has no biological daughter). Turns out the only ass was James Lindsay himself.

Originally, news of James Lindsay’s open marriage came from his own family, with his stepdaughter outing him. This led to many admissions by James Lindsay’s stepdaughter about James Lindsay’s family life.

She ended up regretting this, not because it was a lie or wrong, but because remarkably unintelligent right-wingers (Patrick Casey) tried to make her the focus of the story.

The first person to make this go viral was a user who goes by “King Goy”. To his credit, he did better than the other grifters who boosted it and ignored the open-marriage story to dunk on James Lindsay’s adult daughter.

The coverage wasn’t perfect. Many details were wrong, like portraying James Lindsay as letting his wife sleep with other men, which, according to my sources, isn’t part of the dynamic. That’s not really something I would overly criticize because there was no way to know what a “one-sided open marriage” entailed.

Annoyingly, “King Goy” is spineless, so he let far more malicious reactionary grifters like Milo and Patrick Casey walk all over his narrative. That will be addressed later.

In any case, James Lindsay’s stepdaughter candidly explained the whole situation. It’s baffling that grifters want to attack her when she was a useful source of information and really didn’t deserve the ire. They should consider not being counterproductive incels for 5 minutes.

Lindsay’s stepdaughter attempted to reconcile with him, and he was fully uninterested. Keep in mind that James Lindsay feigns deep care for his family, but then refuses to speak to them.

James Lindsay still has his stepdaughter blocked. Apparently, he blocked her immediately when she called him out too.

James Lindsay’s stepdaughter asserted he never spent more than $300 on her. To be fair, he’s broke.

Apparently, in the Lindsay household, you can see James walking around in a circle swinging his sword all day.

Disturbingly, James Lindsay forced his stepdaughter not to be Christian in high school when she wanted to be. He made her sit with him and learn how the bible was both made up and evil, along with bashing Christians daily.

James Lindsay would reach out to his stepdaughter for the first time in 3 years to get her to shut up. James would complain that “it’s an act to get you to tell secrets about us.” What secrets?

Hilariously, at the start of this, James Lindsay claimed it was a fake account run by Karlyn Borysenko. He would then repeatedly confirm that it was indeed his stepdaughter, ignoring the fact that he had her number and could have confirmed it was hers, which he later did.

By then, the goalpost had shifted to discrediting his stepdaughter, despite his inability to contest any of her testimony.

The narrative was that Karlyn Borysenko “groomed” his stepdaughter, even though, of her own volition as a 28-year-old adult, she decided to speak up against her stepfather.

One of James Lindsay’s friends, Frank McCormick (CBHeresy), attempted to accuse James Lindsay’s haters of grooming and harassing his adult stepdaughter. This is odd, given that she mentioned the open marriage without prompting.

In return, James’ stepdaughter came out to accuse Frank of harassing and attempting to groom her. However, I don't believe the latter half is accurate; you can’t be shocked when you throw around such slander.

The NXIVM Sex Cult And Grooming

One of the oddest aspects of James Lindsay is his relation to the pedophile human trafficking cult NXIVM. James denies the connection, but the evidence is damning.

In general, it's inexplicable. Given James Lindsay's crusading against “grooming,” this undermines everything he claims to stand for.

James Lindsay has gone out of his way to downplay this link and openly befriend some of the most intimately involved cult members. It’s very possible, although not confirmed, that James Lindsay had sexual relations with an NXIVM member when they were still in the cult and in contact with its pedophile leader. At a minimum, they got physical.

The evidence points to a possible romantic affair, but at a minimum an exceptionally close friendship.

Private communications I’ve obtained paint a different picture than what James Lindsay has portrayed in public. James Lindsay has stated, “I just went to an event with her!” At best, this is a lie. Why lie?

9 months before the event at which the infamous photo was taken, James Lindsay identified himself as a “silent supporter” of top NXIVM member Nicki Clyne after she referred to such hidden people. That’s a bit more involved than “just taking a photo at an event you went to with someone.”

The extent of James Lindsay's involvement with a member of the pedophile grooming cult NXIVM has been severely downplayed by James Lindsay himself.

That ranges from their communications to the extent of their relationship to their real-life interactions and, oddly, mutually shared talking points that ran cover for NXIVM.

To understand why this matters, know that much of James Lindsay’s career rests on a single word: “groomer.” James Lindsay is widely credited with popularizing “groomer” and, more specifically, “ok groomer,” the latter of which he was banned on Twitter for, making him a free speech martyr.

According to an early 2022 report from the Center for Countering Digital Hate and the Human Rights Campaign, James Lindsay was the 2nd most prominent person pushing these ideas. Only Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene got more views pushing these ideas.

James Lindsay got over 35 million views in just a few months pushing the “ok groomer” meme. The legacy of this prominence endured until 2024, when Ron DeSantis and James Lindsay appeared on the same podcast episode.

For context, NXIVM was a sex cult that involved minors. The leader, Keith Raniere, was charged with 120 years in prison. He sexually abused a 15 year old minor and then took pictures of it as CSAM blackmail.

It was connected to the Bronfman family, described by the Daily Forward as the “single biggest contributor in the Jewish charitable world.” The Bronfman family’s fortune was used to fund NXIVM and its grooming of people, including minors.

This was over 150 million dollars. Without the Bronfmans, it’s entirely possible NXIVM wouldn’t have existed as it did.

When members of the cult began to get charged, the Bronfman family paid for their legal defense. That includes paying for lawyers to defend them against charges of sexually trafficking minors and child pornography.

Naturally, I asked the ex-mistress about this. James Lindsay did mention the fact that he knew Nicki Clyne personally. Apparently, he laughed about knowing someone connected to a grooming cult that targeted minors.

According to the ex-mistress, James Lindsay defended Nicki Clyne in private. He argued she didn’t know and that it was guilt by association. Many facts proven in court counter that.

If James Lindsay met this woman only once or twice at an event, why would he defend her in private?

James Lindsay actively knew NXIVM was a sex trafficking operation and described it to his ex-mistress. James Lindsay “laughed at the accusers” and had to clarify he wasn’t a part of NXIVM.

James went out of his way to say he never slept with Nicki Clyne, which is super weird.

Apparently, James Lindsay described Nicki Clyne as “hot.” In 2003, that might make sense; nowadays, that’s rather odd. The ex-mistress speculated that it’s possible James Lindsay was denied sex by Nicki Clyne.

According to the ex-mistress, James Lindsay, a married man, expressed the desire to “fuck” a woman who was attached to the time in a pedophile grooming cult. James Lindsay had a wife AND at least 1 mistress, but was pining for a woman in a literal grooming cult.

Just speculation, but it appears that James Lindsay was lying to his ex-mistress. The fact that he had to clarify that he wasn’t having sex with her, but she was hot, is suspicious. James Lindsay is not exactly known for his lack of sexual interest.

Mr. “anti-groomer” James Lindsay and Nicki Clyne, who was still in a sex cult related to grooming minors at this time, were openly flirting and discussing sex in August 2021. Even if they didn’t have sex, these replies are next-level strange.

Perhaps stranger, James Lindsay offered a neck massage to Nicki Clyne, who was embroiled in a pedophile sex cult controversy at that time. James Lindsay met Nicki Clyne in real life in November 2021 at the Better Discourse 2 event, saying, “You should have mentioned this. I would have fixed it.” Giving a massage in the middle of an event seems quite unlikely.

At the after-party, Nicki Clyne was drinking with James Lindsay and recorded it (archive). Not exactly an ideal location for massages!

Nicki Clyne was still a NXIVM cultist, but James Lindsay was still meeting her. They were intimate enough to give each other massages and drink together. One must wonder how many times they met up, and why we don’t know more.

It casts new light on the picture James Lindsay himself posted of their legs overlapping and touching. Did James give that fabled massage he mentioned earlier to a member of a pedophile sex cult?

From July 31st, 2021, to November 15th, 2021, James Lindsay replied to Nicki Clyne 21 separate times over 3 and a half months. In total, James Lindsay replied to Nicki Clyne 33 different times (archive). Nicki Clyne first replied to James Lindsay as early as May 3rd, 2021. In total, I counted over 90 replies from Nicki Clyne to James Lindsay, with around 60 in 2021.

By the time James Lindsay was following Nicki Clyne, she was tweeting things like “The NXIVM narrative is a psy op.”

Just weeks before meeting James Lindsay in April 2022, Nicki Clyne defended the term “groomer” in his replies, specifically in the context of “child grooming.” That’s very crazy for someone who was involved in a pedophile grooming cult.

James Lindsay saw a cult member who had yet to denounce her pedophile boyfriend, who openly defended “child grooming,” and he thought, “I should take pictures with her.” Weeks later they took pictures together.

Two months before posting about meeting James Lindsay in real life, Nicki Clyne was blackmailing the grooming victims of Keith Raniere’s sex trafficking in February 2022. Keep in mind that, according to James and Nicki, they met in November 2021. The court had to make an order to stop Clyne from publicly leaking the names of sex trafficking victims and blackmailing them into submission.

This is who James Lindsay befriends, lusts after, and defends. A groomer who blackmails sex trafficking victims.

In January 2023, Nicki Clyne defended Keith Raniere’s CSAM charges. She slandered the victims, claiming the CSAM was planted on Keith Raniere’s hard drive. None of these supposed forensics experts materialized when push came to shove.

James Lindsay befriended Nicki Clyne long before she “denounced” convicted pedophile and groomer Keith Raniere in March 2023. However, she refused to denounce Raniere as a pedophile, making the same argument both she and Raniere had made prior that the CSAM was planted on his computer.

In Nicki Clyne’s supposed denouncing of Keith Raniere, she goes out of her way to sow doubt in the prosecution. She doesn’t bring up the grooming or human trafficking. Her reason is that she was personally spurned and manipulated by Raniere. A few months earlier, in December 2022, Nicki Clyne described convicted pedophile Keith Raniere as “kind” and talked about missing him.

If it is true, as credible experts have claimed, that the FBI was complicit in fabricating evidence to convict Keith Raniere, I support its exposure and the holding of those responsible accountable.

Nicki Clyne has never once apologized for her attacks against Keith Raniere’s victims that occurred even years after the fact. That’s despite Nicki attacking his sex trafficking victims and underage victims for years.

Nicki Clyne and Keith Raniere's argument that the CSAM was planted has been refuted at every stage. In December 2022, a federal appeals court upheld the trial as fair. In November 2023, the court found no evidence of tampering.

In July 2023, the minor who was groomed and used to produce CSAM testified under oath that she was 15, along with her sister, who testified that it was her younger sister in those pictures.

Raniere and the Bronfman legal team are still trying to push this narrative legally to this day because of the vast amounts of cash they have access to. They argue that due to chain-of-custody violations, this evidence was planted on sex trafficker Keith Raniere.

The issue is that this argument admits a 15 year old was a member of a sex cult and implies the FBI somehow had nudes of this child from 14 years before the prosecution. Every court that has heard this argument rejects it outright.

The broken chain of custody and failure to follow proper procedures are concerning. However, when you have multiple witnesses, including the victim herself and her family, and your evidence relies on either AI in 2019 or time travel, those arguments are irrelevant to dismissing the case.

11 months before Nicki Clyne “denounced” her ex-boyfriend, who was convicted of sex trafficking minors, James Lindsay was posting pictures to brag about hanging out with her. Even with the most generous lens, Nicki Clyne still supported the grooming of minors, and James Lindsay was hanging with her at the peak of his relevance in pushing the “groomer” idea.

During the event this photo was taken at, Better Discourse 3, James Lindsay parroted Nicki Clyne’s defense of NXIVM’s pedophile leader.

Sitting next to Nicki (who was still romantically involved with Keith Raniere), James Lindsay made the very specific argument that the government could fabricate child porn and put it on your phone. This is one of Keith Raniere’s defenses, along with what Nicki Clyne was claiming.

It’s worth asking: why did James Lindsay make an argument implying federal agents are putting CSAM on people’s phones, next to a friend of his who was defending a pedophile using the same argument?

Nicki Clyne was in the replies to James Lindsay, making this verbatim argument a few months after this.

Nicki was still in the cult years after the prosecution of Keith Raniere for sex trafficking. Nicki was actively in contact with the victim who was groomed as a minor.

Nicki Clyne was literally an illegal immigrant, only kept in the United States due to marriage fraud on behalf of NXIVM. Nicki Clyne was married to Allison Mack, who groomed the women and was indicted on sex trafficking charges. Pedophile sex trafficker Keith Raniere arranged this marriage to keep Nicki Clyne around.

In contrast, despite being more legally implicated as one of Raniere’s top people, Allison Mack has openly denounced Keith Raniere as a pedophile and doesn’t claim the FBI fabricated evidence. She did this 3 years before Nicki put out a half-hearted statement, and she called Raniere what he is: a grooming pedophile.

The only reason why Nicki Clyne wasn’t charged was that the DOJ was overburdened and Nicki played it smart. The NXIVM case is one of the most wide-ranging, complicated RICO cases ever prosecuted.

It was a cult within another cult; Nicki Clyne was in both. The goal of the prosecutors wasn’t to get everyone, but to cut the head off the hydra and end the cult by targeting the ringleaders most implicated.

Nicki Clyne was no victim. She was in the cult for over 12 years in 2018, so really around 16-17 years by the time she denounced it. When she took the stand, she repeatedly invoked her right to remain silent. As a high-ranking, but not top-ranking member, she got off due to a lack of resources, not a lack of guilt.

The US Attorney’s Office of the Eastern District of New York labeled Nicki Clyne as a “first-line master” within DOS. That ranks her within the top 15 or so people.

Specifically, the masters were the ones who would recruit, enslave, and continue to groom victims. It was never litigated whether or not Nicki Clyne recruited other women, but that was her role in the group.

To make the case that she was a victim, as James Lindsay does, is an incredible stretch. She was unrepentant, did everything she could to stall the case, and ran public relations for Keith Raniere while he was imprisoned for CSAM.

To make a case that Nicki Clyne was innocent, you need to grapple with why she attacked the federal prosecutors as late as mid-2023, when she performatively denounced Keith Raniere.

Was Nicki Clyne victimized? To some extent, yes; according to court documents, she got into tens of thousands of dollars of debt over NXIVM.

That doesn’t make her a victim, though. She continued to victimize even worse-off victims, years after the cult ended. She showed no compassion for those she victimized, resulting from the role she played before and after.

To quote Nicki Clyne in The Vow documentary series: "DOS has been misunderstood because I helped create it.” DOS was the inner cult of NXIVM, where the primary focus was branding women, collecting blackmail, and human trafficking.

Originating in late 2022, 3 years after the conviction and judgment, Nicki Clyne would state about the sex cult within NXIVM named DOS:

"sex was not the focus of anything. Like, people are so obsessed with sex. It was also a walking group. It was also a go-for-coffee group. We were people who had relationships that were incredibly important and meaningful to us that we planned to have for the rest of our lives."

From 2020 to 2023, Nicki Clyne was one of the top defenders of her former boyfriend, convicted pedophile Keith Raniere. In 2020, she defended Keith Raniere, saying he was innocent, the evidence was fabricated, and she loved her experience with NXIVM / DOS.

In 2021, she pretended NXIVM didn’t involve human trafficking. In 2022, she repeated this line, trying to frame DOS as some girl-power anti-woke group. In 2022, she defended DOS and Keith Raniere in “The Vow” documentary series.

Later in 2022, Nicki admitted she still wanted to speak with Keith Raniere and that she loved him. She was only stopped because the jail forced her to stop around May 2022 after Keith tried to use her to convert someone to Judaism and tried to communicate through another person with him.

To be clear, my issue isn’t that Nicki Clyne didn’t take legal responsibility (regardless of the extent of her involvement). That’s something I can’t litigate.

What I can litigate is the fact that she’s never taken responsibility for attacking the sex trafficking victims for years, including running cover for CSAM production.

To lay it all out: when James Lindsay posted that picture with Nicki Clyne, she was still both supporting pedophile groomer Keith Raniere and was in contact with him in some capacity. Nicki Clyne was openly blackmailing victims of sex trafficking, including minors. Nicki Clyne was not hiding this.

James Lindsay was helping to revive Nicki Clyne’s career and platform her while she was still in full, unrepentant support of a pedophile. James Lindsay then parroted her exact talking points that were used to defend a pedophile.

When James Lindsay and Nicki Clyne first started to communicate in July 2021, during this time, Nicki Clyne was attempting to blackmail Keith Reniere’s grooming victims. This was also obviously not the first time James Lindsay and Nicki Clyne had communicated.

In early 2023, Nicki Clyne was running defense for CSAM and trying to sow doubt in the prosecution. Even in her “denouncement,” she invokes the same debunked arguments. This was years after knowing James Lindsay.

To this day, James Lindsay downplays his relationship with Nicki Clyne, yet in private describes her as “hot” and wanting to “fuck” her. In private, James Lindsay felt compelled to deny, whether true or not, that he had sexual relations with that woman. Based on the evidence, it appears he at least got physical, if not had sex with her.

James Lindsay actively laughed at the people genuinely concerned about his relationship with a grooming cult member who was still essentially in that cult. James Lindsay has never addressed this, never explained this, and treats it as a joke.

James has spent more time covering up his relationship with Nicki Clyne than ever calling out the grooming sex cult she was involved with. That is extremely weird for someone who built their career on opposing groomers. James Lindsay and Nicki Clyne were playing dumb about this, then later Nicki denounced the sex trafficking pedophile cult leader (for tricking her, not for pedophilia).

James Lindsay lied about and downplayed his closeness to Nicki Clyne. He lied about how many events he went to with her. James Lindsay was even pushing her exact talking points on stage next to her. Why lie?

As of 2025, James Lindsay still defends Nicki Clyne and, oddly, Nicki Clyne, despite being largely absent, logs in primarily to reply to James Lindsay.

James Lindsay’s Funders and Connections (Zionists)

James Lindsay is truly exceptional in how fervent his Zionism is. He will purity spiral against other Zionists for not meeting his standard of servitude to Israel. Even people like Captive Dreamer, a hardcore Zionist who recently took the trip to Israel, will allude to the fact that James is funded by Zionists.

That doesn’t absolve Captive Dreamer’s circle from being Zionist backed and funded, but it does show that even Zionists who take the trip to Israel will point out that James Lindsay is a Zionist shill. This sentiment is rather common within these circles.

As mentioned before, James Lindsay has handlers. It is not a joke, but a serious aspect of his career that he acknowledges in private. Beyond that, James Lindsay has met with the Israeli Parliament and Israeli government officials.

James Lindsay was afraid of upsetting his “handlers” with his sexual affairs, hanging around the wrong people with them around, and was required to meet with them when they demanded. James Lindsay is fully at his patrons' behest, whom he called “handlers.”

It is an undeniable fact that James Lindsay and his “handlers” have a very strange relationship with Israel. That's along with tons of connections to Israel via the organizations that bolster them and Jewish billionaires who back James Lindsay. That is not “woke right,” but reality.

My understanding is that in general, James Lindsay’s “handlers” are Christian Baptist Evangelical dispensationalists. James Lindsay benefits from this wider ecosystem backed by Jewish billionaires, with very specific Jewish billionaires giving him money.

At least one of these 3 “handlers” is Michael O’Fallon. Michael owns James Lindsay’s outlet, “New Discourses.”

The address listed for the LLC appears to be Michael O'Fallon's home address, and it also hosts another LLC, “Christian Cruises,” owned by O’Fallon.

The brass tax is that the business is Michael O’Fallon’s; the company is in Michael O’Fallon’s name; James Lindsay is just an employee listed as a manager, likely with a stake in the business.

James Lindsay lies about this, despite being called out for over 3 years. In public, James Lindsay mocks anyone for calling Michael O’Fallon his funder; in private, he readily admits he has handlers, including O'Fallon, who are his financial patrons.

James Lindsay claims it was just an initial donation that was paid back, which, yes, that’s how an investment generally works. The issue is that the business is still under Michael O’Fallon’s name as of 2026, and the principal address is one of Michael O’Fallon’s homes.

The fact that James Lindsay cites “the up-front costs of incorporation” should be a dead giveaway that something is up: it costs $125 to incorporate an LLC in Florida.

If it were truly James Lindsay’s business and he paid Michael O’Fallon back what he invested to purchase the business, why is Michael O’Fallon still the owner of “New Discourses” on paper?

Notably, the LLC was last updated in 2023 to change the mailing address; it cost $25 to make that change, and it would cost $25 more to hand everything over to James Lindsay.

In 2024, James Lindsay said he had paid off the debt he owed O'Fallon for the 2019 investment. Despite this, the LLC was last updated in 2023 with no alterations. The business was not handed over then or now.

Michael O’Fallon denies funding James Lindsay, but does so with a very transparent lie. In private, James Lindsey and his wife would constantly rant to his ex-mistress about his financial issues.

James Lindsay’s wife, Heather, confided in the ex-mistress that they were desperately waiting for book money to come in to pay off debts in 2021. Heather Lindsay, a masseuse, earned more than James Lindsay from 2018 to 2022. Why would Michael lie here?

If this were true, the business wouldn’t still be in Michael O’Fallon’s name, as court documents show. It makes no sense for this to remain the case if James Lindsay has no economic tie to Michael O’Fallon.

Why would James Lindsay bolster Michael O’Fallon’s cruise business by mixing them with “New Discourses” lectures if he truly wasn’t paid by Michael O’Fallon?

Michael O’Fallon is an absolutely bizarre guy. In 2023, Michael O’Fallon was kicked off the G3 Ministries board in part because of his partnership with Christian-hating James Lindsay.

At first, the only two commonalities between the two men were being “anti-woke” and having strong opinions on Israel. James Lindsay published multiple books bashing Christianity, and then an ardent God-first evangelical decided to make him his business partner. James Lindsay’s display name on Twitter was “GodDoesnt” until late 2018.

About two months after New Discourses launched, Michael O’Fallon announced that he had just returned on a flight from Tel Aviv “after meeting with the government of Israel in support of the sovereign nation of Israel.”

Why was a US citizen meeting with the government of Israel, particularly a few months after he launched a media company?

Looking at Michael O’Fallon’s branding, you have: Sovereign Cruises, Sovereign Events, Sovereign Alliance, Sovereign Luxury Experiences, and Sovereign Nations (media). Specifically, that last one, sovereign nation(s), is how Michael O’Fallon oddly describes Israel.

Michael O’Fallon has claimed he knows and is experienced with Israeli intelligence.

On October 8th, 2023, James Lindsay's senior business partner, Michael O’Fallon, stated, “Having a good amount of personal knowledge and experience in regards to the military and intelligence presence in Israel - I'm having a hard time reconciling what I know.”

As part of running a tour guide business, Michael O’Fallon specializes in taking “thousands” of Christians (ie Evangelicals) to Israel. People on these trips are often recruited by intelligence agencies or willingly become volunteers for Israel. Many of these Holy Land tours openly advertise that they use “ex”-Mossad agents.

The “woke right” terminology originates in its current context from a Jewish billionaire, Susan Lebovitz-Edelman, in Michael O’Fallon’s replies, no less. The idea originated on August 22, 2023.

The term had been thrown around before, but in this context, it became a broader cultural concept. James Lindsay first used the term in January 2024.

Five days after coining the term, Susan Lebovitz-Edelman made a curious post explaining her reasoning for using the “woke right” to get James Lindsay’s attention. James Lindsay made an episode attacking “Christian nationalism”; Mrs.Lebovitz-Edelman correlated Christian nationalism with the term “woke right.”

Notably, this was based on James Lindsay’s Patreon, meaning that Suzy Lebovitz-Edelman is giving money to James Lindsay and New Discourses. We don't know the amount, or if she's supporting him in other ways, but she is giving James Lindsay money.

Suzy Lebovitz-Edelman openly gives money to James Lindsay on Twitter. Although this doesn’t necessarily mean James is or has been “funded” by her to a significant degree, her level of fondness for him, his boosting of her talking points, and the fact that she donates to him on two platforms lead me to infer something more.

For full transparency, I reached out to Susan Lebovitz-Edelman for comment on whether she funds James Lindsay or played a role in funding the Grievance Studies Affair. I received no response, which is a tad odd, given that she liked a few dozen of my tweets attacking Candace Owens.

As of 2026, the Edelman family foundation is worth roughly $74 million, with about $14 million given out. The Edelman family is a mega donor to the Chabad-Lubavitch movement, the open-borders think tank Cato Institute, and the Tivkah fund (as its 9th-largest donor).

The Edelman family is heavily linked to the Manhattan Institute. Susan Lebovitz-Edelman sits on the Manhattan Institute’s board, and her husband donated $400,000 to the Manhattan Institute in 2022. The Edelman family donates to FIRE and FAIR, the former of which boosted James Lindsay’s “Grievance Studies Hoax.”

When James Lindsay gave a speech in Israel about how amazing a country it is, how Israel is what conservatives want America to be, and how he met Israeli government officials, Susan Edelman was immediately in the comments praising it. James Lindsay notes that he only got invited to Israel and meet its government officials because he “opposed the woke right.”

While in Israel, James Lindsay took multiple trips to the Knesset and met with at least one Israeli politician. The Israeli politician James Lindsay met, Ohad Tal, isn’t Likud. James Lindsay’s friend Ohad Tal is part of the messianic religious Zionist party called “Revival,” headed by Bezalel Smotrich.

Ohad Tal openly compares Gaza to “Sodom” and calls for Israel to destroy it as God destroyed Sodom, saying everyone in Gaza should be slaughtered. Clearly, the woke right is a bigger issue than openly genocidal religious fanatics who want to bring forth the literal apocalypse.

Why James Lindsay had to attend the Knesset twice in one trip, I can't say. I haven’t personally heard of any influencer being invited twice in a single trip to the Knesset; once is already quite exceptional.

A few months later, James Lindsay would return alongside his friend Pamela Paresky. In roughly 3 months, James Lindsay went to Israel twice.

James Lindsay has admitted he was paid a full year’s worth of salary for his original “grievance studies hoax,” which made him famous and got him on Joe Rogan. This project ran for over a year (from August 2017 to an intended date of January 2019) and required publishing 20 papers; it was an extensive effort.

There were 3 full-time employees, 4 if you count the documentary maker who recorded them for a year. That is a lot of money and time to take on a bet.

Know who has since touted James Lindsay endlessly and the Grievance Studies Hoax? Susan Lebovitz-Edelman, a patron of James Lindsay, has brought it up dozens of times. It’s entirely possible she helped fund the launch of James Lindsay’s career; even if she didn't, she does in some capacity now.

All of this is tied into this wider network of “classical liberal” anti-wokists who happen to see opposing antisemitism as their main cause. More than any other value, they are aligned by an allegiance to Israel.

The Manhattan Institute, Genspect, the Jewish Institute for Liberal Values (now renamed NAVI), the Aspen Center for Human Development, SAPIR journal, and the Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI). Many of these apparatuses have direct links to the Koch bros, the Edelman Family Foundation, Paul Singer, or Israel itself.

I would call this faction “neo-ZOG” or “nu-ZOG.” They don’t fit in with the BAPists or Peter Thiel; they’re quite opposed to Peter Thiel’s Straussianism. They’re opposed to groypers and Christian nationalism of all sorts. They strongly oppose NatCon and Yoram Hazony’s “National Conservatism,” attack key proponents, and are also critical of J.D. Vance.

Recently, you see this in James Lindsay’s war against NATCON for hosting an event in Israel, with Jew Jonathan Keeperman pointing out that shaming young Americans doesn’t work. James Lindsay thinks that, as a goy Zionist, he can lecture Jews in Israel about how not to be antisemitic.

Neo-ZOG represents center-right conservatives backed by a Jewish elite that has managed to “make it,” but is somewhat disenfranchised from the other Jewish elite due to more fringe right-wing beliefs. They are preoccupied with cultural issues that the general pro-Israel elite wouldn’t spend political capital on. They are a political vanguard.

This faction would have people like Data Republican, Bret Stephens, Bret Weinstein, Bari Weiss, Christina Buttons, the NCRI, Peter Boghossian, Paul Singer, the Edelman family, Joel Berry, Douglas Murray, Colin Wright, Pamela Paresky, James Lindsay, and Chris Rufo. Admittedly, some of these people are among the most successful conservative figures of the past decade, but that’s because they have serious financial backing and are willing to cross factional lines to build support.

“Neo-ZOG” fits: these Zionists may not fully “occupy our government,” but they hold some degree of sway and have proximity to power. They’re at odds with other factions of Jewish power, but still have the same end goal.

The CBS buyout of Bari Weiss’ The Free Press for an inflated amount. Data Republican’s influence on DOGE. The NCRI's study on TikTok and its subsequent boosting by The Free Press leading to its sale. Even James Lindsay's ability to influence education nationwide is a factor in this.

The goal of this faction is to combat “racism,” often in the form of anti-semitism, from the right. They take up cultural issues like “wokeism,” “critical race theory,” gender issues, trans ideology, supposed communist/foreign influence, and liberal bias in academia. Some crossover comes from the “Intellectual Dark Web.”

The BAPists want Israel to be strong because they think America should mirror it, but believe that how it exists is fine. Groypers obviously don’t like Israel. NatCon is more reformist regarding the US’ relationship with Israel, but is somewhat close to the BAPists. Neo-ZOG is unabashedly Israel-first, and any cultural uproar is to serve that or bolster credibility towards that end.

There’s some crossover with the BAPists and Neo-ZOG, but less than you may think. The more successful actors succeed in part because they can cross factional lines; they are willing to set their faction aside to push their core ideas. They have the money, the influence, and the media, so all that’s required is to get more organic factions of the right duped into backing their cause.

On Blaze TV Chris Rufo hosts a podcast with BAPist Isaac Keeperman(L0m3z), who owns the Thiel-backed Passage Press. Peter Thiel’s Quillette mag was one of the first to platform James Lindsay and hosts the NCRI-linked Pamela Paresky to this day.

Neo-ZOG re-routes energy from popular cultural issues into directly supporting Jews and Israel. For example, they will happily cheer on opposition to anti-White discrimination insofar as it benefits Jews and doesn’t instigate a racial consciousness.

For example, the “Jewish Institute for Liberal Values” is funded by Jewish billionaire Adam Beren, according to the Daily Forward. Adam Beren started the “Combat Anti-Semitism Movement”(CAM) and later reused its donation domain for the JILV.

A 2025 leak shows that one of CAM's top board members, former intelligence officer Sima Vaknin-Gill, was sending emails about how to evade FARA illegally. Sima Vaknin-Gill now serves on the NCRI board.

The Jewish Institute for Liberal Values openly touts being funded by the Voices of Israel and the Israeli Ministry of Diaspora Affairs and Combating Antisemitism.

On their website, they promote James Lindsay’s book, and in interviews, the founder name-drops James Lindsay. When James Lindsay's co-author on the “Grievance Studies Affair,” Helen Pluckrose's outlet shut down, they redirected to the JILV's sister organization, with the same people involved, the Institute for Liberal Values.

When you look at the funding of the Jewish Institute for Liberal Values? You find the Edelman Family Foundation, Home Depot’s CEO Bernie Marcus, and the ADL-linked Nagen Project Inc. (Right-click to expand)

The Aspen Center For Human Development (rebranded as the “Free Mind Institute”) is quite important in this ecosystem. Harvard’s Pamela Paresky leads it, and James Lindsay is a fellow there. Bret Stephens is a Senior Scholar at the Aspen Center For Human Development. Bret Weinstein is a faculty fellow.

Pamela Paresky is the author of pieces like “Yes, Anti-Zionism Is Anti-Semitic.” Pamela regularly appears on Israeli podcasts about how DEI is anti-semitic, and her opposition to DEI is based on Jewishness.

What it comes down to is that Pamela Paresky sees anti-semitism or anti-zionism as “soviet” or “communist.” From there, she pathologizes any criticism of Israel or Jewish power as “mental illness,” using her position at Harvard in the Psychology department under Steven Pinker.

Pamela Paresky has an impressive resume; she was the Chief Research Officer to the President and CEO of FIRE (which boosted James Lindsay early), Adjunct/Research Professor at the United States Air Force Academy, and Visiting Senior Research Associate at the Stevanovich Institute on the Formation of Knowledge at the University of Chicago.

If you look through, Pamela is one of the key nodes in neo-zog. Pamela Paresky has spoken at Genspect; she has conversed with Bret Stephens on SAPIR, done panels for the Israel-financed Jewish Institute for Liberal Values, and even spoke on the YouTube Channel of the Israeli cut-out “Combat Antisemitism Movement" (archive).

Naturally, Pamela Paresky has been published in Bari Weiss’ “The Free Press.” Bari Weiss herself cites Pamela Paresky. In fact, in 2019, Bari Weiss regularly met with Pamela Paresky for dinner.

Pamela Paresky and James Lindsay themselves are exceptionally close! They have replied to each other since November 1st, 2018. James Lindsay replied to Pamela Paresky over 210 times before 2020. In total, over 270 times.

When James Lindsay went to Israel a second time in early 2026, Pamela Paresky accompanied him the entire way, including into the Dead Sea. They’re close enough that they visit Israel together, seemingly without James’ wife.

Pamela Paresky even took the photo for James Lindsay’s iconic profile picture. James has had this profile picture for around 7 years.

In May 2026, the two attended the “World Symposium Against Anti-Zionism,” with Pamela claiming that if you’re anti-Zionist, you are immoral.

James Lindsay and Pamela Paresky were keynote speakers. That’s along with Amir Epstein, a Canadian jew who helps jews either go back to Israel or form colonies in emerging countries.

From here, we have the fulcrum: the Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI). The NCRI ties everything together, including James Lindsay's future.

The NCRI is an ouroboros. Pamela Paresky and Jussim Lee publish nonsense there. The Manhattan Institute and Bari Weiss’ Free Press boost it using their own articles. Then James Lindsay, DataRepublican (Jennica Pounds), and Colin Wright boost those articles, if not the NCRI itself. Then Pamela Paresky and NCRI head Joel Finkelstein continue to give James Lindsay access and talk privately with DataRepublican.

From June 2025 to July 2026, James Lindsay cited and defended the NCRI 10 different times on X. James Lindsay is one of the most prominent proponents of the NCRI.

Despite that, James Lindsay’s good friends, Colin Wright of the Manhattan Institute and DataRepublican, take the cake for mindlessly pushing the NCRI's dubious research.

All these networks, influences, and institutions work in sync to take down anything challenging Israel's power. Their opposition to DEI or communism only exists to serve as a vessel for pro-Israel sentiment.

Another connection is the NCRI’s Lee Jussim, who helped author the Nick Fuentes report. To be fair, Lee denies being “close” to James Lindsay, but their Twitter history dates back to 2018.

Lee Jussim and James Lindsay’s relationship dates back to before even the Grievance Studies Affair that launched Lindsay’s career. Pretty odd coincidence, given fewer than a dozen people have consistently engaged with James Lindsay for 8+ years.

In any case, these Christian Zionists and jews aren't getting their money's worth with James Lindsay. James Lindsay will fundamentally misstate the history of Israel and Palestine to a degree that undermines his whole credibility, regardless of your opinion on that topic. His arguments in favor of Israel are so bad that they undermine the case for zionism.

James Lindsay asserts that “to the river to the sea” is a Palestinian phrase calling for genocide. The fact is, Israeli jews first used this phrase before 1948, according to ex-IDF soldier and historian Omer Bartov.

The 1929 Zionist song “The East Bank of The Jordan” includes a line with the same premise. The 1977 Likud party election manifesto included this phrase. Ironically, the group that took James Lindsay to Israel, Herut, has a section on their website commemorating the man most commonly cited as the creator of “the river to the sea,” Ze’ev Jabotinsky.

James Lindsay will travel halfway across the world before doing basic research on what he's talking about.

When the PLO adopted this phrase in the 1960s, it was a projection. Rather than a projection of reality, as James Lindsay coins it, it was a projection of what Zionists had been saying for decades.

James Lindsay wants to pretend to be a pro-Israel historian expert on Palestine and Jews as a whole, meanwhile making an argument that jews are genocidal.

More of the story is that any Jews, Zionists, or Evangelicals investing in James Lindsay should get a refund. Or don’t; continue backing an incompetent sex pest with a dozen different sex scandals in waiting who makes your cause look horrendous to anyone under 60 years old.

Credit to “SherkTriad” for being the initial person to get a lot of the Israel and Michael O’Fallon connections. I expanded on it, but I wanted to give credit for getting the ball rolling.

Milo and Patrick Casey Harass James Lindsay's Step-Daughter

I fully denounce how Milo Yiannopoulos and Patrick Casey have engaged with James Lindsay. I’m not doing that because of factionalism, politics, or my personal distaste. It’s because they suck at attacking James Lindsay and make it about harassing his family.

This piece includes aspects of his family (though they are public aspects that James himself has mentioned), but I am not attacking his wife, stepdaughter, or family. I am pointing out the record of what occurred and how James Lindsay acts behind closed doors. Frankly, I feel bad for James Lindsay’s family, and so does his ex-mistress.

These bumbling idiots did such a bad job that they both alienated James Lindsay’s stepdaughter from speaking up more and made alogging James Lindsay into this weird thing nobody wants to touch. They made it personal, creepy, and went after James Lindsay’s family, who don’t even like James.

Milo Yiannopoulos specifically wrote a 14 page (lists 26 but review says 14) smut book about some sick fantasy he has of James Lindsay raping his underage step daughter. So not only have you defamed a random woman who had the misfortune of being James Lindsay’s stepdaughter, you cucked the content.

Let me get this right, so James Lindsay befriends and boosts a key member of a pedophile sex cult, and Milo chooses to make up some defamatory pedophile fanfiction?

This is exactly why modern-year Milo is incredibly washed and incompetent. You have a home run, and Milo manages to totally fumble it, content in being a pedophile defender himself.

It’s hard to articulate how annoyed I am to have to engage with this topic. It should be easy to dunk on James Lindsay; he’s a Zionist Jordan Peterson-tier sex pest dork with links to a pedophile grooming cult. Instead, these people want to attack his family and claim he’s an incestuous pedophile rapist, because of clout and clicks.

These idiots argue that Candace Owens and Tucker are reviving James Lindsay’s career. It’s you guys who’ve failed to discredit Lindsay and give him legitimacy within his cult with these unhinged personal attacks.

These people have routinely gone out of their way to attack and shame his stepdaughter for no reason. She had an OnlyFans account at like 25 for around a month and then quit. We don’t even know if there were nudes. Is that a slam dunk to the point that it needs to be the main talking point?

These idiots still push the OnlyFans thing like it’s a killshot. It’s obviously not good, but she was an adult; she barely had a relationship with her stepdad, James Lindsay, at that point, and it’s a weird way to use someone to attack another. There’s no way to know if James Lindsay even knew about it.

You don’t need to rely on speculation. James was having sex with women outside of his marriage. James is a proud sex pest who sleeps with any woman to the point that they have blackmail on him worse than what I have. James openly grifts and betrays everything he claims to believe in nonstop.

Patrick Casey is a dishonest charlatan. In reality, Patrick Casey agrees with 95% of what James Lindsay believes; just Lindsay is a dork who doesn’t fit into the cool kids club of 40-year-old washed-up “ex”-Nazis.

The only issues Patrick Casey seems to have are that James Lindsay doesn’t like his e-daddy Paul Gottfried, doesn’t love JD Vance, and isn’t enough of a shill for Israel.

Patrick Casey’s issue is that the “woke right” wasn’t exclusively used against anyone critical of Israel. Patrick Casey fully agrees with the idea of the “woke right”, calling it “gutter antisemitism,” as if Patrick Casey believes in any antisemitism.

Patrick Casey opposes open borders, as does James Lindsay. Patrick supports Israel wholeheartedly, so does James Lindsay.

Pat Casey and Lindsay mutually assert that criticizing Israel is “brown-coded,” asserting that it’s exclusively done by foreigners from the Global South. Both Casey and Lindsay are ardently opposed to the left, which they treat as their main guiding principle. Likewise, both support the idea of a “woke right”.

Patrick Casey and James Lindsay are two sides of the same coin; they share the same beliefs, worldview, and enemies. Every time Patrick Casey writes at length about James Lindsay, he admits Lindsay is “half-right” or that he agrees with his ideas. The difference is that James Lindsay is successful, while Patrick Casey is not.

Patrick Casey’s own followers, whom he himself follows, were making unhinged death threats at James Lindsay’s estranged step-daughter. In all fairness, Peter Rex Groyper (not a real groyper) is some 19 year old idiot, but this is the type of rhetoric Patrick Casey supports.

Patrick Casey wants to paint himself as “the adult in the room.” Meanwhile, he harasses James Lindsay’s family with ad hominems and endorses his followers making death threats at James Lindsay’s family. Naturally, I disavow all violence, but this is an exceptionally pointless case.

One may say, “This gives ammo to James Lindsay!” I don’t care. Patrick Casey and Milo had no reason to engage the way they did by attacking his family, who don’t even support him. I want to make it clear that my criticism is isolated from their harassment campaign.

Funnily enough, James Lindsay's friend Frank McCormick follows Patrick Casey despite the death threats against James Lindsay's family and Patrick actually harassing his step daughter. Weird, I thought harassing James Lindsay’s family was a step too far? Almost as if these people all agree deep down!

You’re free to hate James Lindsay; he’s detestable. There’s no reason to harass his family as the centerpiece, make death threats, and write vile pedophile fanfiction about him and his family.

Leave his family alone; just by being related to James Lindsay, they have suffered more than one can imagine. The only reason to bring up James Lindsay’s family is to articulate what a horrible husband and Christian he's been with his philandering.

A Career Ruined: DataRepublican and The Future Of James Lindsay

James Lindsay embodies the Ship of Theseus. Every belief he held has been fundamentally replaced, every part of his worldview wholesale restructured, and he now exists in defiance of himself.

A deeply embarrassing example is, if you quote 2021 James Lindsay to him today, he will categorically deny his own words and ideas as if he never said them. James Lindsay actively mocks his audience for believing what he preached for most of his career.

Not just, “I was wrong, and my views have changed,” but outright rejecting that his past self existed. The James Lindsay of 2026 has nothing to do with his past self; he mocks himself.

Although James Lindsay may be cooked, his cancerous ideas live on through his allies and proxies. Shameless shills like Data Republican, the NCRI, Joel Berry, or the Manhattan Institute’s Colin Wright will attempt to preserve his legacy without understanding why he gained it in the first place.

In any case, James Lindsay's current existence is so repulsive that even dogs will puke at the sight of him. Nature itself revolts at James Lindsay’s corrupted visage.

Likewise, the same fools who boost DataRepublican will then bemoan James Lindsay when they’re no different, except that DataRepublican is marginally more talented. Let me give you a spoiler: James Lindsay will remain relevant as long as you keep boosting a subversive like DataRepublican.

Mrs. Holier-Than-Thou Jennica Pounds will defend supposed Christian James Lindsay for cheating on his wife. She will keep trying to salvage James Lindsay and push his dangerous ideas.

The very premise James Lindsay based his career on, opposing critical race theory, has been undermined by his own ego and greed. James Lindsay's proposition was explicit: “critical race theory is anti-white.”

There may have been an asterisk, such as “neo-Marxism” is more important or that CRT was racist against everyone and only using anti-White sentiment, but it was still “blatantly anti-White.” As James says himself, it's ridiculous to deny that fact.

At one point, James Lindsay was openly saying White people will be genocided because of CRT. James has tried to put this genie back in the bottle, revising the points that made his career take off into “CRT is not anti-White racism and you’re woke right if you believe that factors in.”

The reason why James Lindsay gained relevance was because of a wider climate of anti-White hatred that persists. When James Lindsay's purity spiraled on that premise into “any form of racism, including self-preservation meant to counter CRT, is evil,” his ideological project was destroyed.

If you look back at the original “Grievance Studies Hoax” that made James Lindsay famous, one central theme was the attack on “Whiteness” in academia.

If I had to guess, James Lindsay’s funders realized that his rhetoric could be used to push more extreme values and ideas they don’t agree with. James was never a White racialist, but some of those people picked up the ideas he was using. Creating a counter “woke right” concept was the solution, an appeal to centrism based on supposed classical liberal values that happen never to criticize the ethnonationalist state of Israel.

Regardless of supporting racism or not, the baseline of James Lindsay's ideology was opposition to modern liberalism. Modern liberalism is based in anti-White sentiment. James champions himself as a Jordan Peterson-style “classical liberal,” formally giving a speech on this in late 2023 around when he shifted.

The underlying issue with this framework is that it's a terrible lens. Broadly, society isn't anti-communist or anti-socialist; it's anti-nazi. You will get fired, debanked, and have your life ruined for promoting far-right ideas, not for safe, edgy socialist platitudes.

Western civilization as it exists isn't anti-black or anti-brown; it's anti-White. There is employment discrimination, discrimination in higher education, and even housing discrimination against White people.

The “woke left” controls institutions such as lower & higher education, culture, and the economic levers of society, such as banks and payment processors. The “woke right” (if it exists) is a bunch of edgy social media users.

These are things James Lindsay was addressing, even if they were more a symptom than a cause. Then he made his own supporters who backed him on this reality into the virus.

Societal advantages rooted in social justice or critical race theory benefit minorities and women, compensating for historical disadvantages that no longer exist today. White Men are left for dead, and although White Men of specific societal classes may be more advantaged generally, the majority of young White Men systematically discriminated against.

James Lindsay spoke to those young White men who had been robbed of their livelihood, robbed of their civilization, robbed of their culture. James Lindsay’s opposition to critical race theory spoke to a generation of young White men.

When push came to shove, James Lindsay stabbed his core base of supporters in the back for a country in the Middle East that is the living embodiment, for better or for worse, of critical race theory.

As James Lindsay becomes increasingly irrelevant, grifters like DataRepublican will succeed him—a more savvy, better-spoken, less openly ideological, more data-driven sequel.

Shockingly, former Pentagon-hired influencer DataRepublican compared James Lindsay to Charlie Kirk. To be frank, that’s weirdo behavior at best, and downright parasocial at worst.

In the name of Charlie Kirk, James Lindsay threatened violence against Kai Schwemmer. He uses Charlie Kirk’s very name to justify violence against his fellow conservatives. I’m sure DataRepublican will conveniently ignore James’ unhinged behavior that came in the aftermath of a doxing scandal he perpetuated.

You already see Data Republican doxing White men for not hating their race, and then lying about it. She is engaging in the same behavior as someone like Ta-Nehisi Coates.

DataRepublican boosted the names, faces, careers, and locations of 40 innocent men who did nothing to her, then implied they were feds with no evidence. Surely, if there were feds, you could find some within a group of 40.

The message DataRepublican took away from James Lindsay isn’t that CRT is anti-White. What Jennica Pounds took away was a post-2024 James Lindsay-ism: that if you believe in Whites having an in-group, you need to have your life ruined. Self-preservation is fine for jews, not Whites.

DataRepublican isn’t going after White nationalists, Patriot Front, or groypers because she believes they’re some nefarious “fed op.” That notion is ironic given DataRepublican's relationship with the federal government.

DataRepublican goes after them because she sees White Men standing up for themselves racially as bigoted and evil. Jennica Pounds uses a baseless assertion of being a federal informant to justify her anti-White crusade.

The societal factors that created anti-CRT, the modern “classic liberalism” movement, and the alt-right go unaddressed. Both post-2024 James Lindsay and DataRepublican have a childlike Kantian worldview, where “racism is bad” because “what if people were racist to me?”

That’s great; White people are replaced in their own country by the admission of Jennica. Mean words are worse than systematic extermination of a race in their own homeland, apparently.

A DEI hire like Jennica Pounds, who worked at a multi-billion-dollar technology company, isn’t going to understand what an average White man is going through. She doesn’t understand what someone like James Lindsay went through to arrive at his views, and what a grand betrayal his “woke right” notion is to his audience.

Someone like that, out of touch with the common man and right-wing Zeitgeist, lacks the ability to empathize with the thousands of White men James Lindsay lured in and then alienated.

DataRepublican alludes to James Lindsay's fall from grace only because she sees how universally hated he is. She doesn’t actually grasp why he got popular or why people turned against him. Her feeble brain is no different than a chimp; all she can acknowledge is positive social engagement.

DataRepublican will still cite James Lindsay as “redpilling” her and her husband. Imagine that for a second, you had no clue there were any problems with the world or “wokeness,” until James Lindsay informed you in your mid-30s.

What a joke to imply James Lindsay's fall is in any way related to religion. James Lindsay's career took off as he was a staunch atheist. Whether or not James Lindsay is supposedly a Christian does not make his terrible ideas any more palatable or discredit his past achievements.

James Lindsay became popular because he opposed overt anti-Whiteness in academia. He gained relevance due to calling out the Jewish Frankfurt School. James Lindsay got notoriety talking about cultural Marxism, a spinoff of Nazi ideas. DataRepublican understands none of this because she's foolish enough to buy into ad hoc “I'm a classical liberal” shtick.

None of these people- James Lindsay, Patrick Casey, Milo, DataRepublican- address society as it exists. They are addressing inner right-wing factionalism because one group is ascendant, while the other is withering on the vine. There is good money in being a toadie of the establishment.

They are more interested in purity spiraling; keeping the White man down, attacking anyone even slightly critical of Zionism, and discrediting anyone who doesn’t base their worldview on nebulous opposition to “communism.” James Lindsay and his critics have more in common than either would like to admit.

These influencers are all frauds. James Lindsay will take a crumb of pussy from Hitler-loving, self-proclaimed anti-Semite while having a wife.

Patrick Casey will campaign against James Lindsay and promote violent threats against his family, then admit, “I actually agree with James Lindsay on basically everything.”

Milo will pretend to oppose James Lindsay, then make the strongest arguments in his favor, attack his family, and give him all the wiggle room to escape his failings.

DataRepublican will post graphs showing the White population dropping to attack diversity, then attack White people for wanting to collectivize and oppose replacement. Meanwhile, she promotes James Lindsay, who attacks anyone else pointing out this very reality.

Ultimately, none of these people mentioned in this article believe what they spout, outside of unquestioning loyalty to Israel. They are nihilistic Machiavellians who will say anything for a paycheck. It’s all vibes-based empty tastemaking.

It’s a very unique ecosystem where all sides suck. James Lindsay and his apostles are a fifth column. The disingenuous cottage industry of James Lindsay critics has the same beliefs as James Lindsay, just 2-4 years behind.

Nobody here is capable of asking, “Were James Lindsay’s beliefs ever worth taking seriously, particularly seeing where they lead?”